EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Biswajit Khara
dblp:252/4595
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5964-8739ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
High-performance computing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 24% Segmentation and scene understanding · 7% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Distributed multigrid neural solvers on megavoxel domains · SC 2021 Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approaches · SC 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural PDE solvers |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural PDE Solvers for Irregular Domains · Comput. Aided Des. 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural PDE Solvers for Irregular Domains · Comput. Aided Des. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
differentiable programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentiable Spline Approximations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed multigrid neural solvers on megavoxel domains · SC 2021 |
Computational science and engineering
numerical simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approaches · SC 2019 |
High-performance computing › performance optimization at scale
parallel scalability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approaches · SC 2019 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
partial differential equation solver |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approaches · SC 2019 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approaches · SC 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Differentiable Spline Approximations · NeurIPS 2021 |
High-performance computing › cluster computing
heterogeneous clusters |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed multigrid neural solvers on megavoxel domains · SC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 2.3mesh-free method · 0.8k-d tree · 0.8a posteriori error estimation · 0.8multigrid methods · 0.5multigrid method · 0.5gradient-based optimization · 0.5autodiff · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Neural PDE Solvers for Irregular Domains
Biswajit Khara, Ethan Herron, Aditya Balu, Dhruv Gamdha, Chih-Hsuan Yang, Anushrut Jignasu, Zhanhong Jiang, Soumik Sarkar, Chinmay Hegde, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Adarsh Krishnamurthy |
Comput. Aided Des. | 1 |
| 2021 | Differentiable Spline ApproximationsabstractThe paradigm of differentiable programming has significantly enhanced the scope of machine learning via the judicious use of gradient-based optimization. However, standard differentiable programming methods (such as autodiff) typically require that the machine learning models be differentiable, limiting their applicability. Our goal in this paper is to use a new, principled approach to extend gradient-based optimization to functions well modeled by splines, which encompass a large family of piecewise polynomial models. We derive the form of the (weak) Jacobian of such functions and show that it exhibits a block-sparse structure that can be computed implicitly and efficiently. Overall, we show that leveraging this redesigned Jacobian in the form of a differentiable "layer'' in predictive models leads to improved performance in diverse applications such as image segmentation, 3D point cloud reconstruction, and finite element analysis. We also open-source the code at \url{https://github.com/idealab-isu/DSA}. Minsu Cho, Aditya Balu, Ameya Joshi, Anjana Deva Prasad, Biswajit Khara, Soumik Sarkar, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Chinmay Hegde |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2021 | Distributed multigrid neural solvers on megavoxel domainsabstractWe consider the distributed training of large scale neural networks that serve as PDE (partial differential equation) solvers producing full field outputs. We specifically consider neural solvers for the generalized 3D Poisson equation over megavoxel domains. A scalable framework is presented that integrates two distinct advances. First, we accelerate training a large model via a method analogous to the multigrid technique used in numerical linear algebra. Here, the network is trained using a hierarchy of increasing resolution inputs in sequence, analogous to the `V', `W', `F' and `Half-V' cycles used in multigrid approaches. In conjunction with the multi-grid approach, we implement a distributed deep learning framework which significantly reduces the time to solve. We show scalability of this approach on both GPU (Azure VMs on Cloud) and CPU clusters (PSC Bridges2). This approach is deployed to train a generalized 3D Poisson solver that scales well to predict output full field solutions up to the resolution of 512 X 512 X 512 for a high dimensional family of inputs. This strategy opens up the possibility of fast and scalable training of neural PDE solvers on heterogeneous clusters. Aditya Balu, Sergio Botelho, Biswajit Khara, Vinay Rao, Soumik Sarkar, Chinmay Hegde, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Santi Adavani, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian |
SC | 3 |
| 2019 | Solving PDEs in space-time: 4D tree-based adaptivity, mesh-free and matrix-free approachesabstractNumerically solving partial differential equations (PDEs) remains a compelling application of supercomputing resources. The next generation of computing resources - exhibiting increased parallelism and deep memory hierarchies - provide an opportunity to rethink how to solve PDEs, especially time dependent PDEs. Here, we consider time as an additional dimension and simultaneously solve for the unknown in large blocks of time (i.e. in 4D space-time), instead of the standard approach of sequential time-stepping. We discretize the 4D space-time domain using a mesh-free kD tree construction that enables good parallel performance as well as on-the-fly construction of adaptive 4D meshes. To best use the 4D space-time mesh adaptivity, we invoke concepts from PDE analysis to establish rigorous a posteriori error estimates for a general class of PDEs. We solve canonical linear as well as non-linear PDEs (heat diffusion, advection-diffusion, and Allen-Cahn) in space-time, and illustrate the following advantages: (a) sustained scaling behavior across a larger processor count compared to sequential time-stepping approaches, (b) the ability to capture "localized" behavior in space and time using the adaptive space-time mesh, and (c) removal of any time-stepping constraints like the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) condition, as well as the ability to utilize spatially varying time-steps. We believe that the algorithmic and mathematical developments along with efficient deployment on modern architectures shown in this work constitute an important step towards improving the scalability of PDE solvers on the next generation of supercomputers. Masado Ishii, Milinda Fernando, Biswajit Khara, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Hari Sundar |
SC | 4 |