Gautham Dharuman

dblp:252/4606 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1472-1947ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
High-performance computing · 83% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
1.122024
MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization · SC 2024
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
multiscale modeling
0.412019
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU and heterogeneous computing
0.212024
MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization · SC 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational oncology
cancer modeling
0.112019
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal generative models · 0.8mixed precision · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization
abstract
We present a scalable, end-to-end workflow for protein design. By augmenting protein sequences with natural language descriptions of their biochemical properties, we train generative models that can be preferentially aligned with protein fitness landscapes. Through complex experimental-and simulation-based observations, we integrate these measures as preferred parameters for generating new protein variants and demonstrate our workflow on five diverse supercomputers. We achieve >1 ExaFLOPS sustained performance in mixed precision on each supercomputer and a maximum sustained performance of 4.11 Ex-aFLOPS and peak performance of 5.57 ExaFLOPS. We establish the scientific performance of our model on two tasks: (1) across a predetermined benchmark dataset of deep mutational scanning experiments to optimize the fitness-determining mutations in the yeast protein HIS7, and (2) in optimizing the design of the enzyme malate dehydrogenase to achieve lower activation barriers (and therefore increased catalytic rates) using simulation data. Our implementation thus sets high watermarks for multimodal protein design workflows.
Gautham Dharuman, Kyle Hippe, Alex Brace, Sam Foreman, Väinö Hatanpää, Varuni Sastry 0001, Huihuo Zheng, Logan T. Ward, Servesh Muralidharan, Archit Vasan, Bharat Kale, Carla M. Mann, Yun-Hsuan Cheng, Yuliana Zamora, Shengchao Liu, Chaowei Xiao, Murali Emani, Tom Gibbs, Mahidhar Tatineni, Deepak Canchi, Jerome Mitchell, Koichi Yamada, María Jesús Garzarán, Michael E. Papka, Ian T. Foster, Rick L. Stevens, Anima Anandkumar, Venkatram Vishwanath, Arvind Ramanathan
SC1
2019 A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer
abstract
Computational models can define the functional dynamics of complex systems in exceptional detail. However, many modeling studies face seemingly incommensurate requirements: to gain meaningful insights into some phenomena requires models with high resolution (microscopic) detail that must nevertheless evolve over large (macroscopic) length- and time-scales. Multiscale modeling has become increasingly important to bridge this gap. Executing complex multiscale models on current petascale computers with high levels of parallelism and heterogeneous architectures is challenging. Many distinct types of resources need to be simultaneously managed, such as GPUs and CPUs, memory size and latencies, communication bottlenecks, and filesystem bandwidth. In addition, robustness to failure of compute nodes, network, and filesystems is critical.
Francesco Di Natale, Harsh Bhatia, Timothy S. Carpenter, Chris Neale, Sara Kokkila Schumacher, Tomas Oppelstrup, Liam Stanton, Shiv Sundram, Thomas Scogland, Gautham Dharuman, Michael P. Surh, Yue Yang 0034, Claudia Misale, Lars Schneidenbach, Carlos H. A. Costa, Changhoan Kim, Bruce D'Amora, Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran, Dwight V. Nissley, Frederick H. Streitz, Felice C. Lightstone, Peer-Timo Bremer, James N. Glosli, Helgi I. Ingólfsson
SC11