EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arlind Kadra
dblp:252/5295
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 42% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
2.0 | 3 | 2024 | Quick-Tune: Quickly Learning Which Pretrained Model to Finetune and How · ICLR 2024 Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Supervising the Multi-Fidelity Race of Hyperparameter Configurations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tabular data |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Supervising the Multi-Fidelity Race of Hyperparameter Configurations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hypernetwork |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-trained models
pre-trained model selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quick-Tune: Quickly Learning Which Pretrained Model to Finetune and How · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
power-law scaling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
multi-fidelity hyperparameter tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Supervising the Multi-Fidelity Race of Hyperparameter Configurations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer perceptron |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning lifecycle management
experiment management |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenML · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning platform |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenML · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Supervising the Multi-Fidelity Race of Hyperparameter Configurations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenML · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
learning curve modeling · 1.3scikit-learn extension · 1.0API design · 1.0performance prediction · 0.8per-instance linear models · 0.8deep hypernetworks · 0.8gray-box evaluation · 0.7ensemble of neural networks · 0.7deep power laws · 0.7gaussian process · 0.6acquisition function · 0.6gradient-boosted decision trees · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quick-Tune: Quickly Learning Which Pretrained Model to Finetune and HowabstractWith the ever-increasing number of pretrained models, machine learning practitioners are continuously faced with which pretrained model to use, and how to finetune it for a new dataset. In this paper, we propose a methodology that jointly searches for the optimal pretrained model and the hyperparameters for finetuning it. Our method transfers knowledge about the performance of many pretrained models with multiple hyperparameter configurations on a series of datasets. To this aim, we evaluated over 20k hyperparameter configurations for finetuning 24 pretrained image classification models on 87 datasets to generate a large-scale meta-dataset. We meta-learn a gray-box performance predictor on the learning curves of this meta-dataset and use it for fast hyperparameter optimization on new datasets. We empirically demonstrate that our resulting approach can quickly select an accurate pretrained model for a new dataset together with its optimal hyperparameters. Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Fabio Ferreira, Arlind Kadra, Frank Hutter, Josif Grabocka |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular DataabstractEven though neural networks have been long deployed in applications involving tabular data, still existing neural architectures are not explainable by design. In this paper, we propose a new class of interpretable neural networks for tabular data that are both deep and linear at the same time (i.e. mesomorphic). We optimize deep hypernetworks to generate explainable linear models on a per-instance basis. As a result, our models retain the accuracy of black-box deep networks while offering free-lunch explainability for tabular data by design. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our explainable deep networks have comparable performance to state-of-the-art classifiers on tabular data and outperform current existing methods that are explainable by design. Arlind Kadra, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif Grabocka |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter OptimizationabstractHyperparameter optimization is an important subfield of machine learning that focuses on tuning the hyperparameters of a chosen algorithm to achieve peak performance. Recently, there has been a stream of methods that tackle the issue of hyperparameter optimization, however, most of the methods do not exploit the dominant power law nature of learning curves for Bayesian optimization. In this work, we propose Deep Power Laws (DPL), an ensemble of neural network models conditioned to yield predictions that follow a power-law scaling pattern. Our method dynamically decides which configurations to pause and train incrementally by making use of gray-box evaluations. We compare our method against 7 state-of-the-art competitors on 3 benchmarks related to tabular, image, and NLP datasets covering 59 diverse tasks. Our method achieves the best results across all benchmarks by obtaining the best any-time results compared to all competitors. Arlind Kadra, Maciej Janowski, Martin Wistuba, Josif Grabocka |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Supervising the Multi-Fidelity Race of Hyperparameter ConfigurationsabstractMulti-fidelity (gray-box) hyperparameter optimization techniques (HPO) have recently emerged as a promising direction for tuning Deep Learning methods. However, existing methods suffer from a sub-optimal allocation of the HPO budget to the hyperparameter configurations. In this work, we introduce DyHPO, a Bayesian Optimization method that learns to decide which hyperparameter configuration to train further in a dynamic race among all feasible configurations. We propose a new deep kernel for Gaussian Processes that embeds the learning curve dynamics, and an acquisition function that incorporates multi-budget information. We demonstrate the significant superiority of DyHPO against state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimization methods through large-scale experiments comprising 50 datasets (Tabular, Image, NLP) and diverse architectures (MLP, CNN/NAS, RNN). Martin Wistuba, Arlind Kadra, Josif Grabocka |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular DatasetsabstractTabular datasets are the last "unconquered castle" for deep learning, with traditional ML methods like Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees still performing strongly even against recent specialized neural architectures. In this paper, we hypothesize that the key to boosting the performance of neural networks lies in rethinking the joint and simultaneous application of a large set of modern regularization techniques. As a result, we propose regularizing plain Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) networks by searching for the optimal combination/cocktail of 13 regularization techniques for each dataset using a joint optimization over the decision on which regularizers to apply and their subsidiary hyperparameters. We empirically assess the impact of these regularization cocktails for MLPs in a large-scale empirical study comprising 40 tabular datasets and demonstrate that (i) well-regularized plain MLPs significantly outperform recent state-of-the-art specialized neural network architectures, and (ii) they even outperform strong traditional ML methods, such as XGBoost. Arlind Kadra, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter, Josif Grabocka |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenMLabstractOpenML is an online platform for open science collaboration in machine learning, used to share datasets and results of machine learning experiments. In this paper, we introduce OpenML-Python, a client API for Python, which opens up the OpenML platform for a wide range of Python-based machine learning tools. It provides easy access to all datasets, tasks and experiments on OpenML from within Python. It also provides functionality to conduct machine learning experiments, upload the results to OpenML, and reproduce results which are stored on OpenML. Furthermore, it comes with a scikit-learn extension and an extension mechanism to easily integrate other machine learning libraries written in Python into the OpenML ecosystem. Source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/openml/openml-python/. Matthias Feurer 0001, Jan N. van Rijn, Arlind Kadra, Pieter Gijsbers, Neeratyoy Mallik, Sahithya Ravi, Andreas C. Müller 0001, Joaquin Vanschoren, Frank Hutter |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |