Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pragaash Ponnusamy

dblp:252/5544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3790-5757ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Question answering and dialogue systems · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 91% Recommender systems · 9%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity
0.912025
Training-Free Activation Sparsity in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration
0.912025
Training-Free Activation Sparsity in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Training-Free Activation Sparsity in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scaling laws
compute-optimal scaling
0.812024
Mechanistic Design and Scaling of Hybrid Architectures · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.812024
Mechanistic Design and Scaling of Hybrid Architectures · ICML 2024
Information retrieval › indexing
differentiable search index
0.712023
PersonalTM: Transformer Memory for Personalized Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
personalized search
0.712023
PersonalTM: Transformer Memory for Personalized Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
conversational agents
0.412020
Feedback-Based Self-Learning in Large-Scale Conversational AI Agents · AAAI 2020
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112020
Feedback-Based Self-Learning in Large-Scale Conversational AI Agents · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weight quantization · 0.9magnitude-based pruning · 0.9collaborative filtering · 0.9absorbing markov chain · 0.9synthetic capability unit tests · 0.8scaling law analysis · 0.8hierarchical loss · 0.7adapter architecture · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training-Free Activation Sparsity in Large Language Models
abstract
Activation sparsity can enable practical inference speedups in large language models (LLMs) by reducing the compute and memory-movement required for matrix multiplications during the forward pass. However, existing methods face limitations that inhibit widespread adoption. Some approaches are tailored towards older models with ReLU-based sparsity, while others require extensive continued pre-training on up to hundreds of billions of tokens. This paper describes TEAL (**T**raining-Fre**e** **A**ctivation Sparsity in **L**LMs), a simple training-free method that applies magnitude-based activation sparsity to hidden states throughout the entire model. TEAL achieves 40-50\% model-wide sparsity with minimal performance degradation across Llama-2, Llama-3, and Mistral families, with sizes varying from 7B to 70B. We improve existing sparse kernels and demonstrate wall-clock decoding speed-ups of up to 1.53× and 1.8× at 40\% and 50\% model-wide sparsity. TEAL is compatible with weight quantization, enabling further efficiency gains.
James Liu, Pragaash Ponnusamy, Tianle Cai, Ben Athiwaratkun
ICLR2
2024 Mechanistic Design and Scaling of Hybrid Architectures
abstract
The development of deep learning architectures is a resource-demanding process, due to a vast design space, long prototyping times, and high compute costs associated with at-scale model training and evaluation. We set out to simplify this process by grounding it in an end-to-end mechanistic architecture design (MAD) pipeline, encompassing small-scale capability unit tests predictive of scaling laws. Through a suite of synthetic token manipulation tasks such as compression and recall, designed to probe capabilities, we identify and test new hybrid architectures constructed from a variety of computational primitives. We experimentally validate the resulting architectures via an extensive compute-optimal and a new state-optimal scaling law analysis, training over 500 language models between 70M to 7B parameters. Surprisingly, we find MAD synthetics to correlate with compute-optimal perplexity, enabling accurate evaluation of new architectures via isolated proxy tasks. The new architectures found via MAD, based on simple ideas such as hybridization and sparsity, outperform state-of-the-art Transformer, convolutional, and recurrent architectures (Transformer++, Hyena, Mamba) in scaling, both at compute-optimal budgets and in overtrained regimes. Overall, these results provide evidence that performance on curated synthetic tasks can be predictive of scaling laws, and that an optimal architecture should leverage specialized layers via a hybrid topology.
Michael Poli, Armin W. Thomas, Eric Nguyen, Pragaash Ponnusamy, Björn Deiseroth, Kristian Kersting, Taiji Suzuki, Brian L. Hie, Stefano Ermon, Christopher Ré, Ce Zhang 0001, Stefano Massaroli
ICML4
2023 PersonalTM: Transformer Memory for Personalized Retrieval
abstract
The Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Index (DSI) has been proposed as a new information retrieval paradigm, which aims to address the limitations of dual-encoder retrieval framework based on the similarity score. The DSI framework outperforms strong baselines by directly generating relevant document identifiers from queries without relying on an explicit index. The memorization power of DSI framework makes it suitable for personalized retrieval tasks. Therefore, we propose a Personal Transformer Memory (PersonalTM) architecture for personalized text retrieval. PersonalTM incorporates user-specific profiles and contextual user click behaviors, and introduces hierarchical loss in the decoding process to align with the hierarchical assignment of document identifier. Additionally, PersonalTM also employs an adapter architecture to improve the scalability for index updates and reduce computation costs, compared to the vanilla DSI. Experiments show that PersonalTM outperforms the DSI baseline, BM25, fine-tuned dual-encoder, and other personalized models in terms of precision at top 1st and 10th positions and Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR). Specifically, PersonalTM improves p@1 by 58%, 49%, and 12% compared to BM25, Dual-encoder, and DSI, respectively.
Ruixue Lian, Sixing Lu, Clint Solomon Mathialagan, Gustavo Aguilar, Pragaash Ponnusamy, Jialong Han, Chengyuan Ma, Chenlei Guo
SIGIR5
2020 Feedback-Based Self-Learning in Large-Scale Conversational AI Agents
abstract
Today, most of the large-scale conversational AI agents such as Alexa, Siri, or Google Assistant are built using manually annotated data to train the different components of the system including Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and Entity Resolution (ER). Typically, the accuracy of the machine learning models in these components are improved by manually transcribing and annotating data. As the scope of these systems increase to cover more scenarios and domains, manual annotation to improve the accuracy of these components becomes prohibitively costly and time consuming. In this paper, we propose a system that leverages customer/system interaction feedback signals to automate learning without any manual annotation. Users of these systems tend to modify a previous query in hopes of fixing an error in the previous turn to get the right results. These reformulations, which are often preceded by defective experiences caused by either errors in ASR, NLU, ER or the application. In some cases, users may not properly formulate their requests (e.g. providing partial title of a song), but gleaning across a wider pool of users and sessions reveals the underlying recurrent patterns. Our proposed self-learning system automatically detects the errors, generate reformulations and deploys fixes to the runtime system to correct different types of errors occurring in different components of the system. In particular, we propose leveraging an absorbing Markov Chain model as a collaborative filtering mechanism in a novel attempt to mine these patterns. We show that our approach is highly scalable, and able to learn reformulations that reduce Alexa-user errors by pooling anonymized data across millions of customers. The proposed self-learning system achieves a win-loss ratio of 11.8 and effectively reduces the defect rate by more than 30% on utterance level reformulations in our production A/B tests. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first self-learning large-scale conversational AI system in production.
Pragaash Ponnusamy, Alireza Roshan Ghias, Chenlei Guo, Ruhi Sarikaya
AAAI1