Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saminul Haque
dblp:252/5821
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning theory · 52% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 56% Computational complexity · 44% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimation · COLT 2024 Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 A Pretty Fast Algorithm for Adaptive Private Mean Estimation · COLT 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
matrix mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix Mechanisms · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy amplification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix Mechanisms · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimation · COLT 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
instance-optimal mechanism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private statistical estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimation · COLT 2024 |
Information theory › estimation theory › minimax estimation
minimax lower bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimation · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
adaptive estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Pretty Fast Algorithm for Adaptive Private Mean Estimation · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Pretty Fast Algorithm for Adaptive Private Mean Estimation · COLT 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private statistical estimation
private mean estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Pretty Fast Algorithm for Adaptive Private Mean Estimation · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › instance weighting
importance weighting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Is Importance Weighting Incompatible with Interpolating Classifiers? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Is Importance Weighting Incompatible with Interpolating Classifiers? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz-constrained networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical Estimation · COLT 2024 |
Information theory › statistical inference › sequential analysis
sequential detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimation · COLT 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
total variation distance · 1.5t-estimator · 1.5reduction to sequential testing · 1.5exponential mechanism · 1.5sub-gaussian distributions · 1.3mahalanobis norm · 1.3monte carlo accounting · 0.9balls-in-bins batching · 0.9information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.8information-theoretic lower bound · 0.8importance weighting · 0.6gradient norm preservation · 0.4block convolution orthogonal parameterization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix MechanismsabstractWe study the problem of computing the privacy parameters for DP machine learning when using privacy amplification via random batching and noise correlated across rounds via a correlation matrix $\textbf{C}$ (i.e., the matrix mechanism). Past work on this problem either only applied to banded $\textbf{C}$, or gave loose privacy parameters. In this work, we give a framework for computing near-exact privacy parameters for any lower-triangular, non-negative $\textbf{C}$. Our framework allows us to optimize the correlation matrix $\textbf{C}$ while accounting for amplification, whereas past work could not. Empirically, we show this lets us achieve smaller RMSE on prefix sums than the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA). We also show that we can improve on the SOTA performance on deep learning tasks. Our two main technical tools are (i) using Monte Carlo accounting to bypass composition, which was the main technical challenge for past work, and (ii) a ``balls-in-bins'' batching scheme that enables easy privacy analysis and is closer to practical random batching than Poisson sampling. Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Saminul Haque, Thomas Steinke 0002, Abhradeep Thakurta |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Universally Instance-Optimal Mechanisms for Private Statistical EstimationabstractWe consider the problem of instance-optimal statistical estimation under the constraint of differential privacy where mechanisms must adapt to the difficulty of the input dataset. We prove a new instance specific lower bound using a new divergence and show it characterizes the local minimax optimal rates for private statistical estimation. We propose two new mechanisms that are universally instance-optimal for general estimation problems up to logarithmic factors. Our first mechanism, the total variation mechanism, builds on the exponential mechanism with stable approximations of the total variation distance, and is universally instance-optimal in the high privacy regime $\epsilon \leq 1/\sqrt{n}$. Our second mechanism, the T-mechanism, is based on the T-estimator framework (Birg{é}, 2006) using the clipped log likelihood ratio as a stable test: it attains instance-optimal rates for any $\epsilon \leq 1$ up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we study the implications of our results to robust statistical estimation, and show that our algorithms are universally optimal for this problem, characterizing the optimal minimax rates for robust statistical estimation. Hilal Asi, John C. Duchi, Saminul Haque, Feng Ruan |
COLT | 3 |
| 2024 | An information-theoretic lower bound in time-uniform estimationabstractWe present an information-theoretic lower bound for the problem of parameter estimation with time-uniform coverage guarantees. We use a reduction to sequential testing to obtain stronger lower bounds that capture the hardness of the time-uniform setting. In the case of location model estimation and logistic regression, our lower bound is $\Omega(\sqrt{n^{-1}\log \log n})$, which is tight up to constant factors in typical settings. John C. Duchi, Saminul Haque |
COLT | 2 |
| 2023 | A Pretty Fast Algorithm for Adaptive Private Mean EstimationabstractWe design an $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differentially private algorithm to estimate the mean of a $d$-variate distribution, with unknown covariance $\Sigma$, that is adaptive to $\Sigma$. To within polylogarithmic factors, the estimator achieves optimal rates of convergence with respect to the induced Mahalanobis norm $||\cdot||_\Sigma$, takes time $\tilde{O}(n d^2)$ to compute, has near linear sample complexity for sub-Gaussian distributions, allows $\Sigma$ to be degenerate or low rank, and adaptively extends beyond sub-Gaussianity. Prior to this work, other methods required exponential computation time or the superlinear scaling $n = \Omega(d^{3/2})$ to achieve non-trivial error with respect to the norm $||\cdot||_\Sigma$. Rohith Kuditipudi, John C. Duchi, Saminul Haque |
COLT | 3 |
| 2022 | Is Importance Weighting Incompatible with Interpolating Classifiers?
Ke Alexander Wang, Niladri S. Chatterji, Saminul Haque, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2019 | Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional NetworksabstractLipschitz constraints under L2 norm on deep neural networks are useful for provable adversarial robustness bounds, stable training, and Wasserstein distance estimation. While heuristic approaches such as the gradient penalty have seen much practical success, it is challenging to achieve similar practical performance while provably enforcing a Lipschitz constraint. In principle, one can design Lipschitz constrained architectures using the composition property of Lipschitz functions, but Anil et al. recently identified a key obstacle to this approach: gradient norm attenuation. They showed how to circumvent this problem in the case of fully connected networks by designing each layer to be gradient norm preserving. We extend their approach to train scalable, expressive, provably Lipschitz convolutional networks. In particular, we present the Block Convolution Orthogonal Parameterization (BCOP), an expressive parameterization of orthogonal convolution operations. We show that even though the space of orthogonal convolutions is disconnected, the largest connected component of BCOP with 2n channels can represent arbitrary BCOP convolutions over n channels. Our BCOP parameterization allows us to train large convolutional networks with provable Lipschitz bounds. Empirically, we find that it is competitive with existing approaches to provable adversarial robustness and Wasserstein distance estimation. Qiyang Li, Saminul Haque, Cem Anil, James Lucas, Roger B. Grosse, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen |
NeurIPS | 2 |