Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tuan Dam
dblp:252/5881
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
8as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7422-139XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 8 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 37% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
3.5 | 5 | 2025 | Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal Transport · ICML 2025 Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo Planning · ICML 2025 Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous state-action spaces |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Regret Bounds via Low-Rank Structured Variation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
non-stationary reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Regret Bounds via Low-Rank Structured Variation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Regret Bounds via Low-Rank Structured Variation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo Planning · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
robust planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo Planning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty propagation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal Transport · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal Transport · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.8 | 2 | 2025 | Convex Regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2021 Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized optimization
convex regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convex Regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration strategies |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generalized Mean Estimation in Monte-Carlo Tree Search · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
partially observable MDP |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal Transport · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Convex Regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Convex Regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 0.9robust power mean backup · 0.9power mean backup · 0.9polynomial exploration bonus · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9hierarchical optimistic optimization · 0.9gaussian distribution · 0.9finite-sample convergence · 0.9exploration bonus · 0.9alpha-divergence · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree SearchabstractMonte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has demonstrated success in online planning for deterministic environments, yet significant challenges remain in adapting it to stochastic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), particularly in continuous state-action spaces. Existing methods, such as HOOT, which combines MCTS with the Hierarchical Optimistic Optimization (HOO) bandit strategy, address continuous spaces but rely on a logarithmic exploration bonus that lacks theoretical guarantees in non-stationary, stochastic settings. Recent advancements, such as POLY-HOOT, introduced a polynomial bonus term to achieve convergence in deterministic MDPs, though a similar theory for stochastic MDPs remains undeveloped.
In this paper, we propose a novel MCTS algorithm, Stochastic-Power-HOOT, designed for continuous, stochastic MDPs. Stochastic-Power-HOOT integrates a power mean as a value backup operator, alongside a polynomial exploration bonus to address the non-stationarity inherent in continuous action spaces. Our theoretical analysis establishes that Stochastic-Power-HOOT converges at a polynomial rate of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-\zeta})$, $\zeta \in (0,1/2)$, where \( n \) is the number of visited trajectories, thereby extending the non-asymptotic convergence guarantees of POLY-HOOT to stochastic environments. Experimental results on stochastic tasks validate our theoretical findings, demonstrating the effectiveness of Stochastic-Power-HOOT in continuous, stochastic domains. Tuan Dam |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo PlanningabstractMonte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a powerful framework for solving complex decision-making problems, yet it often relies on the assumption that the simulator and the real-world dynamics are identical. Although this assumption helps achieve the success of MCTS in games like Chess, Go, and Shogi, the real-world scenarios incur ambiguity due to their modeling mismatches in low-fidelity simulators. In this work, we present a new robust variant of MCTS that mitigates dynamical model ambiguities. Our algorithm addresses transition dynamics and reward distribution ambiguities to bridge the gap between simulation-based planning and real-world deployment. We incorporate a robust power mean backup operator and carefully designed exploration bonuses to ensure finite-sample convergence at every node in the search tree. We show that our algorithm achieves a convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$ for the value estimation at the root node, comparable to that of standard MCTS. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that our method achieves robust performance in planning problems even under significant ambiguity in the underlying reward distribution and transition dynamics. Tuan Dam, Kishan Panaganti, Brahim Driss, Adam Wierman |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal TransportabstractThis paper introduces a novel backup strategy for Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) tailored for highly stochastic and partially observable Markov decision processes. We adopt a probabilistic approach, modeling both value and action-value nodes as Gaussian distributions, to introduce a novel backup operator that computes value nodes as the Wasserstein barycenter of their action-value children nodes; thus, propagating the uncertainty of the estimate across the tree to the root node. We study our novel backup operator when using a novel combination of $L^1$-Wasserstein barycenter with $\alpha$-divergence, by drawing a crucial connection to the generalized mean backup operator. We complement our probabilistic backup operator with two sampling strategies, based on optimistic selection and Thompson sampling, obtaining our Wasserstein MCTS algorithm. We provide theoretical guarantees of asymptotic convergence of $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$, with $n$ as the number of visited trajectories, to the optimal policy and an empirical evaluation on several stochastic and partially observable environments, where our approach outperforms well-known related baselines. Tuan Dam, Pascal Stenger, Lukas Schneider, Joni Pajarinen, Carlo D'Eramo, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Optimal Regret Bounds via Low-Rank Structured Variation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement LearningabstractWe study reinforcement learning in non-stationary communicating MDPs whose transition drift admits a low-rank plus sparse structure. We propose \textbf{SVUCRL} (Structured Variation UCRL) and prove the dynamic-regret bound \[\scalebox{0.75}{$\displaystyle \widetilde{\mathcal O}\Bigl( \sqrt{SA\,T} + D_{\max}S\sqrt{A\,T} + L_{\max}B_r + D_{\max}L_{\max}B_p + D_{\max}S\sqrt{A\,B_p} + D_{\max}\delta_B B_p + D_{\max}\sqrt{K\,T} \Bigr), $}\] (up to the additional planning-tolerance term $\sum_{t=1}^T \varepsilon_{\tau(m(t))}$). where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ the number of actions, $T$ the horizon, $D_{\max}$ the MDP diameter, $B_r$/$B_p$ the total reward/transition variation budgets, and $K\!\ll\! SA$ the rank of the structured drift, $L_{\max}$ is the maximum episole length. The first two terms are the statistical price of learning in stationary problems. The structure-dependent non-stationarity contribution appears through $D_{\max}\sqrt{K\,T}$ (low-rank drift) and $D_{\max}\delta_B B_p$ (sparse shocks), which scale with $\sqrt{K}$ rather than $\sqrt{SA}$ when drift is low-rank. This matches the $\sqrt{T}$ rate (up to logs) and improves on prior $T^{3/4}$-type guarantees. SVUCRL combines: (i) online low-rank tracking with explicit Frobenius guarantees, (ii) incremental RPCA to separate structured drift from sparse shocks, (iii) adaptive confidence widening via a bias-corrected local-variation estimator, and (iv) factor forecasting with an optimal shrinkage center. Tuan Dam |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Power Mean Estimation in Stochastic Monte-Carlo Tree SearchabstractMonte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a widely-used online planning strategy that effectively combines Monte-Carlo sampling with forward tree search to make optimal decisions in various real-world scenarios. Its success hinges on the application of the Upper Confidence bound for Trees (UCT) algorithm, an extension of the Upper Confidence bound (UCB) method used in multi-arm bandits. However, theoretical investigations of UCT have been found incomplete due to an error in the estimated "logarithmic" bonus term used for action selection in the tree. This issue was addressed by introducing a "polynomial" exploration bonus, which effectively balances the exploration-exploitation trade-off. However, most theoretical studies have focused on deterministic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), neglecting stochastic settings. In this paper, we introduce Stochastic-Power-UCT, an MCTS algorithm explicitly designed for stochastic MDPs using power mean as the value estimator. We conduct a comprehensive study of the polynomial convergence assurance for selecting the optimal action and estimating the value at the root node within our methodology. Our findings demonstrate that Stochastic-Power-UCT shares the same convergence rate as UCT, with UCT being a special case of Stochastic-Power-UCT. Furthermore, we validate our theoretical results through empirical assessments across diverse stochastic MDP environments, providing empirical evidence to support our method’s theoretical claims Tuan Dam, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Emilie Kaufmann |
UAI | 1 |
| 2024 | A Unified Perspective on Value Backup and Exploration in Monte-Carlo Tree SearchabstractMonte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a class of methods for solving complex decisionmaking problems through the synergy of Monte-Carlo planning and Reinforcement Learning (RL). The highly combinatorial nature of the problems commonly addressed by MCTS requires the use of efficient exploration strategies for navigating the planning tree and quickly convergent value backup methods. These crucial problems are particularly evident in recent advances that combine MCTS with deep neural networks for function approximation. In this work, we propose two methods for improving the convergence rate and exploration based on a newly introduced backup operator and entropy regularization. We provide strong theoretical guarantees to bound convergence rate, approximation error, and regret of our methods. Moreover, we introduce a mathematical framework based on the use of the α-divergence for backup and exploration in MCTS. We show that this theoretical formulation unifies different approaches, including our newly introduced ones, under the same mathematical framework, allowing to obtain different methods by simply changing the value of α. In practice, our unified perspective offers a flexible way to balance between exploration and exploitation by tuning the single α parameter according to the problem at hand. We validate our methods through a rigorous empirical study from basic toy problems to the complex Atari games, and including both MDP and POMDP problems. Tuan Dam, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters 0001, Joni Pajarinen |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Convex Regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree SearchabstractMonte-Carlo planning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) are essential to sequential decision making. The recent AlphaGo and AlphaZero algorithms have shown how to successfully combine these two paradigms to solve large-scale sequential decision problems. These methodologies exploit a variant of the well-known UCT algorithm to trade off the exploitation of good actions and the exploration of unvisited states, but their empirical success comes at the cost of poor sample-efficiency and high computation time. In this paper, we overcome these limitations by introducing the use of convex regularization in Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to drive exploration efficiently and to improve policy updates. First, we introduce a unifying theory on the use of generic convex regularizers in MCTS, deriving the first regret analysis of regularized MCTS and showing that it guarantees an exponential convergence rate. Second, we exploit our theoretical framework to introduce novel regularized backup operators for MCTS, based on the relative entropy of the policy update and, more importantly, on the Tsallis entropy of the policy, for which we prove superior theoretical guarantees. We empirically verify the consequence of our theoretical results on a toy problem. Finally, we show how our framework can easily be incorporated in AlphaGo and we empirically show the superiority of convex regularization, w.r.t. representative baselines, on well-known RL problems across several Atari games. Tuan Dam, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters 0001, Joni Pajarinen |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Generalized Mean Estimation in Monte-Carlo Tree SearchabstractWe consider Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) applied to Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and Partially Observable MDPs (POMDPs), and the well-known Upper Confidence bound for Trees (UCT) algorithm. In UCT, a tree with nodes (states) and edges (actions) is incrementally built by the expansion of nodes, and the values of nodes are updated through a backup strategy based on the average value of child nodes. However, it has been shown that with enough samples the maximum operator yields more accurate node value estimates than averaging. Instead of settling for one of these value estimates, we go a step further proposing a novel backup strategy which uses the power mean operator, which computes a value between the average and maximum value. We call our new approach Power-UCT, and argue how the use of the power mean operator helps to speed up the learning in MCTS. We theoretically analyze our method providing guarantees of convergence to the optimum. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in well-known MDP and POMDP benchmarks, showing significant improvement in performance and convergence speed w.r.t. state of the art algorithms. Tuan Dam, Pascal Klink, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters 0001, Joni Pajarinen |
IJCAI | 1 |