Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Régis Loeb

dblp:252/8815 · also Regis Loeb · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy
0.712023
SRATTA: Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning · ICML 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
privacy attack
0.712023
SRATTA: Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated learning systems
cross-silo federated learning
0.612022
FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.612022
FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.212022
FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics › clinical AI
clinical machine learning
0.212022
FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

federated averaging · 1.1benchmark suite · 1.1secure aggregation · 0.7fedavg · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 SRATTA: Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning
abstract
We consider a federated learning (FL) setting where a machine learning model with a fully connected first layer is trained between different clients and a central server using FedAvg, and where the aggregation step can be performed with secure aggregation (SA). We present SRATTA an attack relying only on aggregated models which, under realistic assumptions, (i) recovers data samples from the different clients, and (ii) groups data samples coming from the same client together. While sample recovery has already been explored in an FL setting, the ability to group samples per client, despite the use of SA, is novel. This poses a significant unforeseen security threat to FL and effectively breaks SA. We show that SRATTA is both theoretically grounded and can be used in practice on realistic models and datasets. We also propose counter-measures, and claim that clients should play an active role to guarantee their privacy during training.
Tanguy Marchand, Régis Loeb, Ulysse Marteau-Ferey, Jean Ogier du Terrail, Arthur Pignet
ICML2
2022 FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a novel approach enabling several clients holding sensitive data to collaboratively train machine learning models, without centralizing data. The cross-silo FL setting corresponds to the case of few ($2$--$50$) reliable clients, each holding medium to large datasets, and is typically found in applications such as healthcare, finance, or industry. While previous works have proposed representative datasets for cross-device FL, few realistic healthcare cross-silo FL datasets exist, thereby slowing algorithmic research in this critical application. In this work, we propose a novel cross-silo dataset suite focused on healthcare, FLamby (Federated Learning AMple Benchmark of Your cross-silo strategies), to bridge the gap between theory and practice of cross-silo FL.FLamby encompasses 7 healthcare datasets with natural splits, covering multiple tasks, modalities, and data volumes, each accompanied with baseline training code. As an illustration, we additionally benchmark standard FL algorithms on all datasets.Our flexible and modular suite allows researchers to easily download datasets, reproduce results and re-use the different components for their research. FLamby is available at~\url{www.github.com/owkin/flamby}.
Jean Ogier du Terrail, Samy-Safwan Ayed, Edwige Cyffers, Felix Grimberg, Chaoyang He 0001, Régis Loeb, Paul Mangold, Tanguy Marchand, Othmane Marfoq, Erum Mushtaq, Boris Muzellec, Constantin Philippenko, Santiago Silva 0001, Maria Telenczuk, Shadi Albarqouni, Amir Salman Avestimehr, Aurélien Bellet, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Martin Jaggi, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Marco Lorenzi, Giovanni Neglia, Marc Tommasi, Mathieu Andreux
NeurIPS6