Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anzo Teh
dblp:253/1414 · also Anzo Z. Teh
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 53% Learning theory · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
empirical bayes |
1.7 | 2 | 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretraining · COLT 2026 Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretraining · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior contraction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretraining · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
minimax regret |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds › rademacher complexity
offset rademacher complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretraining · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretraining · COLT 2026 |
Information theory › estimation theory › nonparametric estimation
shape-constrained estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson model · COLT 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rademacher complexity · 1.3empirical risk minimization · 1.3regret bounds · 1.0fractional posterior · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Universal priors: solving empirical Bayes via Bayesian inference and pretrainingabstractWe theoretically justify the recent empirical finding of Teh et al. (2025) that a transformer pretrained on synthetically generated data achieves strong performance on empirical Bayes (EB) problems. We take an indirect approach to this question: rather than analyzing the model architecture or training dynamics, we ask why a pretrained Bayes estimator, trained under a prespecified training distribution, can adapt to arbitrary test distributions. Focusing on Poisson EB problems, we identify the existence of universal priors such that training under these priors yields a near-optimal regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\frac{1}{n})$ uniformly over all test distributions. Our analysis leverages the classical phenomenon of posterior contraction in Bayesian statistics, showing that the pretrained Bayes estimator adapts to unknown test distributions precisely through posterior contraction. This perspective also explains the phenomenon of length generalization, in which the test sequence length exceeds the training length, as the model performs Bayesian inference using a fractional posterior. Nick Cannella, Anzo Teh, Yanjun Han, Yury Polyanskiy |
COLT | 2 |
| 2023 | Empirical Bayes via ERM and Rademacher complexities: the Poisson modelabstractWe consider the problem of empirical Bayes estimation for (multivariate) Poisson means. Existing solutions that have been shown theoretically optimal for minimizing the regret (excess risk over the Bayesian oracle that knows the prior) have several shortcomings. For example, the classical Robbins estimator does not retain the monotonicity property of the Bayes estimator and performs poorly under moderate sample size. Estimators based on the minimum distance and non-parametric maximum likelihood (NPMLE) methods correct these issues, but are computationally expensive with complexity growing exponentially with dimension. Extending the approach of Barbehenn andZhao (2022), in this work we construct monotone estimators based on empirical risk minimization (ERM) that retain similar theoretical guarantees and can be computed much more efficiently. Adapting the idea of offset Rademacher complexity Liang et al. (2015) to the non-standard loss and function class in empirical Bayes, we show that the shape-constrained ERM estimator attains the minimax regret within constant factors in one dimension and within logarithmic factors in multiple dimensions. Soham Jana, Yury Polyanskiy, Anzo Teh, Yihong Wu 0001 |
COLT | 3 |
| 2023 | Comparing Poisson and Gaussian channelsabstractConsider a pair of input distributions which after passing through a Poisson channel become ϵ-close in total variation. We show that they must necessarily then be ϵ0.5+o(1)-close after passing through a Gaussian channel as well. In the opposite direction, we show that distributions inducing ϵ-close outputs over the Gaussian channel must induce ϵ1+o(1)-close outputs over the Poisson. This quantifies a well-known intuition that "smoothing" induced by Poissonization and Gaussian convolution are similar. As an application, we improve a recent upper bound of Han-Miao-Shen’2021 for estimating mixing distribution of a Poisson mixture in Gaussian optimal transport distance from n−0.1+o(1)to n−0.25+o(1). Anzo Teh, Yury Polyanskiy |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2019 | Improved Digital Signatures Based on Elliptic Curve Endomorphism Rings
Xiu Xu, Christopher Leonardi, Anzo Teh, David Jao, Kunpeng Wang 0001, Wei Yu 0008, Reza Azarderakhsh |
ISPEC | 3 |