Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Audace Nakeshimana
dblp:254/0070
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 77% Visualization and visual analytics · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
visual search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Role of Latency and Task Complexity in Predicting Visual Search Behavior · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Visualization and visual analytics › usability and user experience research
user experience research |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Role of Latency and Task Complexity in Predicting Visual Search Behavior · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 0.4crowdsourced study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The Role of Latency and Task Complexity in Predicting Visual Search BehaviorabstractLatency in a visualization system is widely believed to affect user behavior in measurable ways, such as requiring the user to wait for the visualization system to respond, leading to interruption of the analytic flow. While this effect is frequently observed and widely accepted, precisely how latency affects different analysis scenarios is less well understood. In this paper, we examine the role of latency in the context of visual search, an essential task in data foraging and exploration using visualization. We conduct a series of studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk and find that under certain conditions, latency is a statistically significant predictor of visual search behavior, which is consistent with previous studies. However, our results also suggest that task type, task complexity, and other factors can modulate the effect of latency, in some cases rendering latency statistically insignificant in predicting user behavior. This suggests a more nuanced view of the role of latency than previously reported. Building on these results and the findings of prior studies, we propose design guidelines for measuring and interpreting the effects of latency when evaluating performance on visual search tasks. Leilani Battle, R. Jordan Crouser, Audace Nakeshimana, Ananda Montoly, Remco Chang, Michael Stonebraker |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |