EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea Agostinelli
dblp:254/1736
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9638-857XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 32% Generative modeling · 19% Reinforcement learning · 18% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
transferability estimation |
1.7 | 3 | 2022 | How Stable Are Transferability Metrics Evaluations? · ECCV (34) 2022 Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separability · CVPR 2022 Transferability Metrics for Selecting Source Model Ensembles · CVPR 2022 |
Audio and music processing
music generation |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | MusicRL: Aligning Music Generation to Human Preferences · ICML 2024 Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distillation
generative model distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MusicRL: Aligning Music Generation to Human Preferences · ICML 2024 |
Audio and music processing › music generation
text-to-music generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MusicRL: Aligning Music Generation to Human Preferences · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
class separability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separability · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
ensemble selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferability Metrics for Selecting Source Model Ensembles · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
evaluation stability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Stable Are Transferability Metrics Evaluations? · ECCV (34) 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separability · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
source model selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferability Metrics for Selecting Source Model Ensembles · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Transferability Metrics for Selecting Source Model Ensembles · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.7model merging · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.7reinforcement learning from human feedback · 1.5autoregressive model · 1.5transferability metrics · 0.6gaussian modeling · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6bhattacharyya coefficient · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diversity-Rewarded CFG DistillationabstractGenerative models are transforming creative domains such as music generation, with inference-time strategies like Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) playing a crucial role. However, CFG doubles inference cost while limiting originality and diversity across generated contents. In this paper, we introduce diversity-rewarded CFG distillation, a novel finetuning procedure that distills the strengths of CFG while addressing its limitations. Our approach optimises two training objectives: (1) a distillation objective, encouraging the model alone (without CFG) to imitate the CFG-augmented predictions, and (2) an RL objective with a diversity reward, promoting the generation of diverse outputs for a given prompt. By finetuning, we learn model weights with the ability to generate high-quality and diverse outputs, without any inference overhead. This also unlocks the potential of weight-based model merging strategies: by interpolating between the weights of two models (the first focusing on quality, the second on diversity), we can control the quality-diversity trade-off at deployment time, and even further boost performance. We conduct extensive experiments on the MusicLM text-to-music generative model, where our approach surpasses CFG in terms of quality-diversity Pareto optimality. According to human evaluators, our finetuned-then-merged model generates samples with higher quality-diversity than the base model augmented with CFG. Explore our generations at https://musicdiversity.github.io/. Geoffrey Cideron, Andrea Agostinelli, Johan Ferret, Sertan Girgin, Romuald Elie, Olivier Bachem, Sarah Perrin, Alexandre Ramé |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | MAD Speech: Measures of Acoustic Diversity of SpeechabstractMatthieu Futeral, Andrea Agostinelli, Marco Tagliasacchi, Neil Zeghidour, Eugene Kharitonov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Matthieu Futeral, Andrea Agostinelli, Marco Tagliasacchi, Neil Zeghidour, Eugene Kharitonov |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2024 | MusicRL: Aligning Music Generation to Human PreferencesabstractWe propose MusicRL, the first music generation system finetuned from human feedback. Appreciation of text-to-music models is particularly subjective since the concept of musicality as well as the specific intention behind a caption are user-dependent (e.g. a caption such as “upbeat workout music” can map to a retro guitar solo or a technopop beat). Not only this makes supervised training of such models challenging, but it also calls for integrating continuous human feedback in their post-deployment finetuning. MusicRL is a pretrained autoregressive MusicLM model of discrete audio tokens finetuned with reinforcement learning to maximize sequence-level rewards. We design reward functions related specifically to text-adherence and audio quality with the help from selected raters, and use those to finetune MusicLM into MusicRL-R. We deploy MusicLM to users and collect a substantial dataset comprising 300,000 pairwise preferences. Using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), we train MusicRL-U, the first text-to-music model that incorporates human feedback at scale. Human evaluations show that both MusicRL-R and MusicRL-U are preferred to the baseline. Ultimately, MusicRL-RU combines the two approaches and results in the best model according to human raters. Ablation studies shed light on the musical attributes influencing human preferences, indicating that text adherence and quality only account for a part of it. This underscores the prevalence of subjectivity in musical appreciation and calls for further involvement of human listeners in the finetuning of music generation models. Samples can be found at google-research.github.io/seanet/musiclm/rlhf/. Geoffrey Cideron, Sertan Girgin, Mauro Verzetti, Damien Vincent, Matej Kastelic, Zalan Borsos, Brian McWilliams, Victor Ungureanu, Olivier Bachem, Olivier Pietquin, Matthieu Geist, Léonard Hussenot, Neil Zeghidour, Andrea Agostinelli |
ICML | 14 |
| 2022 | Transferability Metrics for Selecting Source Model EnsemblesabstractWe address the problem of ensemble selection in transfer learning: Given a large pool of source models we want to select an ensemble of models which, after fine-tuning on the target training set, yields the best performance on the target test set. Since fine-tuning all possible ensembles is computationally prohibitive, we aim at predicting performance on the target dataset using a computationally efficient transferability metric. We propose several new transferability metrics designed for this task and evaluate them in a challenging and realistic transfer learning setup for semantic segmentation: we create a large and diverse pool of source models by considering 17 source datasets covering a wide variety of image domain, two different architectures, and two pre-training schemes. Given this pool, we then automatically select a subset to form an ensemble performing well on a given target dataset. We compare the ensemble selected by our method to two baselines which select a single source model, either (1) from the same pool as our method; or (2) from a pool containing large source models, each with similar capacity as an ensemble. Averaged over 17 target datasets, we outperform these baselines by 6.0% and 2.5% relative mean IoU, respectively. Andrea Agostinelli, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Thomas Mensink, Vittorio Ferrari |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2022 | Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class SeparabilityabstractTransfer learning has become a popular method for leveraging pre-trained models in computer vision. However, without performing computationally expensive fine-tuning, it is difficult to quantify which pre-trained source models are suitable for a specific target task, or, conversely, to which tasks a pre-trained source model can be easily adapted to. In this work, we propose Gaussian Bhattacharyya Coefficient (GBC), a novel method for quantifying transferability between a source model and a target dataset. In a first step we embed all target images in the feature space defined by the source model, and represent them with per-class Gaussians. Then, we estimate their pairwise class separability using the Bhattacharyya coefficient, yielding a simple and effective measure of how well the source model transfers to the target task. We evaluate GBC on image classification tasks in the context of dataset and architecture selection. Further, we also perform experiments on the more complex semantic segmentation transferability estimation task. We demonstrate that GBC outperforms state-of-the-art transferability metrics on most evaluation criteria in the semantic segmentation settings, matches the performance of top methods for dataset transferability in image classification, and performs best on architecture selection problems for image classification. Michal Pándy, Andrea Agostinelli, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Vittorio Ferrari, Thomas Mensink |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | How Stable Are Transferability Metrics Evaluations?
Andrea Agostinelli, Michal Pándy, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Thomas Mensink, Vittorio Ferrari |
ECCV (34) | 1 |