We study agents acting in an unknown environment where the agent’s goal is to find a robust policy. We consider robust policies as policies that achieve high cumulative rewards for all possible environments. To this end, we consider agents minimizing the maximum regret over different environment parameters, leading to the study of minimax regret. This research focuses on deriving information-theoretic bounds for minimax regret in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with a finite time horizon. Building on concepts from supervised learning, such as minimum excess risk (MER) and minimax excess risk, we use recent bounds on the Bayesian regret to derive minimax regret bounds. Specifically, we establish minimax theorems and use bounds on the Bayesian regret to perform minimax regret analysis using these minimax theorems. Our contributions include defining a suitable minimax regret in the context of MDPs, finding information-theoretic bounds for it, and applying these bounds in various scenarios.

This paper studies the Bayesian regret of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for bandit problems, building on the information-theoretic framework introduced by Russo and Van Roy [1]. Specifically, it extends the rate-distortion analysis of Dong and Van Roy [2], which provides near-optimal bounds for linear bandits. A key limitation of these results is the assumption of a finite action space. We address this by extending the analysis to settings with infinite and continuous action spaces. Additionally, we specialize our results to bandit problems with expected rewards that are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the action space, deriving a regret bound that explicitly accounts for the complexity of the action space.

This paper studies the truncation method from Alquier [1] to derive high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds for unbounded losses with heavy tails. Assuming that the p-th moment is bounded, the resulting bounds interpolate between a slow rate$1/\sqrt{n}$when$p=2$, and a fast rate$1/n$when$p\rightarrow\infty$and the loss is essentially bounded. Moreover, the paper derives a high-probability PAC-Bayes bound for losses with a bounded variance. This bound has an exponentially better dependence on the confidence parameter and the dependency measure than previous bounds in the literature. Finally, the paper extends all results to guarantees in expectation and single-draw PAC-Bayes. In order to so, it obtains analogues of the PAC-Bayes fast rate bound for bounded losses from [2] in these settings. The full version of the paper can be found in https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16681.

In this article, we study the fundamental limits in the design of fair and/or private representations achieving perfect demographic parity and/or perfect privacy through the lens of information theory. More precisely, given some useful data$X$that we wish to employ to solve a task$T$, we consider the design of a representation$Y$that has no information of some sensitive attribute or secret$s$, that is, such that$I(Y;S)=0$. We consider two scenarios. First, we consider a design desiderata where we want to maximize the information$I(Y;T)$that the representation contains about the task, while constraining the level of compression (or encoding rate), that is, ensuring that$I(Y;X)\leq r$. Second, inspired by the Conditional Fairness Bottleneck problem, we consider a design desiderata where we want to maximize the information$I(Y,\ T\vert S)$that the representation contains about the task which is not shared by the sensitive attribute or secret, while constraining the amount of irrelevant information, that is, ensuring that$I(Y;X\vert T,\ S)\leq r$. In both cases, we employ extended versions of the Functional Representation Lemma and the Strong Functional Representation Lemma and study the tightness of the obtained bounds. Every result here can also be interpreted as a coding with perfect privacy problem by considering the sensitive attribute as a secret.

In this paper, we present new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds for different types of losses. Firstly, for losses with a bounded range, we recover a strengthened version of Catoni's bound that holds uniformly for all parameter values. This leads to new fast-rate and mixed-rate bounds that are interpretable and tighter than previous bounds in the literature. In particular, the fast-rate bound is equivalent to the Seeger--Langford bound. Secondly, for losses with more general tail behaviors, we introduce two new parameter-free bounds: a PAC-Bayes Chernoff analogue when the loss' cumulative generating function is bounded, and a bound when the loss' second moment is bounded. These two bounds are obtained using a new technique based on a discretization of the space of possible events for the "in probability" parameter optimization problem. This technique is both simpler and more general than previous approaches optimizing over a grid on the parameters' space. Finally, using a simple technique that is applicable to any existing bound, we extend all previous results to anytime-valid bounds.

To date, no “information-theoretic” frameworks for reasoning about generalization error have been shown to establish minimax rates for gradient descent in the setting of stochastic convex optimization. In this work, we consider the prospect of establishing such rates via several existing information-theoretic frameworks: input-output mutual information bounds, conditional mutual information bounds and variants, PAC-Bayes bounds, and recent conditional variants thereof. We prove that none of these bounds are able to establish minimax rates. We then consider a common tactic employed in studying gradient methods, whereby the final iterate is corrupted by Gaussian noise, producing a noisy “surrogate” algorithm. We prove that minimax rates cannot be established via the analysis of such surrogates. Our results suggest that new ideas are required to analyze gradient descent using information-theoretic techniques.

The mechanisms behind the success of multi-view self-supervised learning (MVSSL) are not yet fully understood. Contrastive MVSSL methods have been studied through the lens of InfoNCE, a lower bound of the Mutual Information (MI). However, the relation between other MVSSL methods and MI remains unclear. We consider a different lower bound on the MI consisting of an entropy and a reconstruction term (ER), and analyze the main MVSSL families through its lens. Through this ER bound, we show that clustering-based methods such as DeepCluster and SwAV maximize the MI. We also re-interpret the mechanisms of distillation-based approaches such as BYOL and DINO, showing that they explicitly maximize the reconstruction term and implicitly encourage a stable entropy, and we confirm this empirically. We show that replacing the objectives of common MVSSL methods with this ER bound achieves competitive performance, while making them stable when training with smaller batch sizes or smaller exponential moving average (EMA) coefficients.

In this work, we study the performance of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for Contextual Bandit problems based on the framework introduced by [1] and their concept of lifted information ratio. First, we prove a comprehensive bound on the Thompson Sampling expected cumulative regret that depends on the mutual information of the environment parameters and the history. Then, we introduce new bounds on the lifted information ratio that hold for sub-Gaussian rewards, thus generalizing the results from [1] which analysis requires binary rewards. Finally, we provide explicit regret bounds for the special cases of unstructured bounded contextual bandits, structured bounded contextual bandits with Laplace likelihood, structured Bernoulli bandits, and bounded linear contextual bandits.

In this article, we propose a new variational approach to learn private and/or fair representations. This approach is based on the Lagrangians of a new formulation of the privacy and fairness optimization problems that we propose. In this formulation, we aim to generate representations of the data that keep a prescribed level of the relevant information that is not shared by the private or sensitive data, while minimizing the remaining information they keep. The proposed approach (i) exhibits the similarities of the privacy and fairness problems, (ii) allows us to control the trade-off between utility and privacy or fairness through the Lagrange multiplier parameter, and (iii) can be comfortably incorporated to common representation learning algorithms such as the VAE, the $\beta$-VAE, the VIB, or the nonlinear IB.

This work presents several expected generalization error bounds based on the Wasserstein distance. More specifically, it introduces full-dataset, single-letter, and random-subset bounds, and their analogous in the randomized subsample setting from Steinke and Zakynthinou [1]. Moreover, when the loss function is bounded and the geometry of the space is ignored by the choice of the metric in the Wasserstein distance, these bounds recover from below (and thus, are tighter than) current bounds based on the relative entropy. In particular, they generate new, non-vacuous bounds based on the relative entropy. Therefore, these results can be seen as a bridge between works that account for the geometry of the hypothesis space and those based on the relative entropy, which is agnostic to such geometry. Furthermore, it is shown how to produce various new bounds based on different information measures (e.g., the lautum information or several $f$-divergences) based on these bounds and how to derive similar bounds with respect to the backward channel using the presented proof techniques.

In this work, we study the generalization capability of algorithms from an information-theoretic perspective. It has been shown that the expected generalization error of an algorithm is bounded from above by a function of the relative entropy between the conditional probability distribution of the algorithm’s output hypothesis, given the dataset with which it was trained, and its marginal probability distribution. We build upon this fact and introduce a mathematical formulation to obtain upper bounds on this relative entropy. Assuming that the data is discrete, we then develop a strategy using this formulation, based on the method of types and typicality, to find explicit upper bounds on the generalization error of stable algorithms, i.e., algorithms that produce similar output hypotheses given similar input datasets. In particular, we show the bounds obtained with this strategy for the case of$\epsilon $-DP and$\mu $-GDP algorithms.

In this work, we unify several expected generalization error bounds based on random subsets using the framework developed by Hellström and Durisi. First, we recover the bounds based on the individual sample mutual information from Bu et al. and on a random subset of the dataset from Negrea et al. Then, we introduce their new, analogous bounds in the randomized subsample setting from Steinke and Zakynthinou, and we identify some limitations of the framework. Finally, we extend the bounds from Haghifam et al. for Langevin dynamics to stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics and we refine them for loss functions with potentially large gradient norms.