Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicole Yang

dblp:254/3819 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.812024
When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems
dynamical system learning
0.812024
When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations
0.212024
When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

jacobian information · 1.5ergodic theory · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?
abstract
Conventional notions of generalization often fail to describe the ability of learned models to capture meaningful information from dynamical data. A neural network that learns complex dynamics with a small test error may still fail to reproduce its \emph{physical} behavior, including associated statistical moments and Lyapunov exponents. To address this gap, we propose an ergodic theoretic approach to generalization of complex dynamical models learned from time series data. Our main contribution is to define and analyze generalization of a broad suite of neural representations of classes of ergodic systems, including chaotic systems, in a way that captures emulating underlying invariant, physical measures. Our results provide theoretical justification for why regression methods for generators of dynamical systems (Neural ODEs) fail to generalize, and why their statistical accuracy improves upon adding Jacobian information during training. We verify our results on a number of ergodic chaotic systems and neural network parameterizations, including MLPs, ResNets, Fourier Neural layers, and RNNs.
Jeongjin Park, Nicole Yang, Nisha Chandramoorthy
NeurIPS2