Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicole Yang
dblp:254/3819
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems
dynamical system learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
jacobian information · 1.5ergodic theory · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?abstractConventional notions of generalization often fail to describe the ability of learned models to capture meaningful information from dynamical data. A neural network that learns complex dynamics with a small test error may still fail to reproduce its \emph{physical} behavior, including associated statistical moments and Lyapunov exponents. To address this gap, we propose an ergodic theoretic approach to generalization of complex dynamical models learned from time series data. Our main contribution is to define and analyze generalization of a broad suite of neural representations of classes of ergodic systems, including chaotic systems, in a way that captures emulating underlying invariant, physical measures. Our results provide theoretical justification for why regression methods for generators of dynamical systems (Neural ODEs) fail to generalize, and why their statistical accuracy improves upon adding Jacobian information during training. We verify our results on a number of ergodic chaotic systems and neural network parameterizations, including MLPs, ResNets, Fourier Neural layers, and RNNs. Jeongjin Park, Nicole Yang, Nisha Chandramoorthy |
NeurIPS | 2 |