Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruijun Chen 0001
dblp:254/6474-1
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5880-7446ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 37% Language models and text generation · 16% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering
knowledge integration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lookahead Routing for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › personalized dialogue
persona-grounded dialogue |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Memorize Entailment and Discourse Relations for Persona-Consistent Dialogues · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Memorize Entailment and Discourse Relations for Persona-Consistent Dialogues · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
discourse relations |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Memorize Entailment and Discourse Relations for Persona-Consistent Dialogues · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
token alignment · 0.9parameter merging · 0.9masked language model · 0.9lightweight fine-tuning · 0.9latent representation prediction · 0.9discriminative policy optimization · 0.9causal language model · 0.9REINFORCE · 0.9PPO · 0.9external memory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat ModelsabstractWhile training large language models (LLMs) from scratch can indeed lead to models with distinct capabilities and strengths, it incurs substantial costs and may lead to redundancy in competencies.Knowledge fusion aims to integrate existing LLMs of diverse architectures and capabilities into a more potent LLM through lightweight continual training, thereby reducing the need for costly LLM development.In this work, we propose a new framework for the knowledge fusion of chat LLMs through two main stages, resulting in FUSECHAT.Firstly, we conduct pairwise knowledge fusion on source chat LLMs of varying structures and scales to create multiple target LLMs with identical structure and size via lightweight fine-tuning.During this process, a statistics-based token alignment approach is introduced as the cornerstone for fusing LLMs with different structures.Secondly, we merge these target LLMs within the parameter space, where we propose a novel method for determining the merging coefficients based on the magnitude of parameter updates before and after fine-tuning.We implement and validate FUSECHAT using six prominent chat LLMs with diverse architectures and scales.Experimental results on two instruction-following benchmarks, AlpacaEval 2.0 and MT-Bench, demonstrate the superiority of FUSECHAT-7B over baselines of various sizes. Fanqi Wan, Longguang Zhong, Ruijun Chen 0001, Xiaojun Quan |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2025 | Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward ModelsabstractProcess reward models (PRMs) provide more nuanced supervision compared to outcome reward models (ORMs) for optimizing policy models, positioning them as a promising approach to enhancing the capabilities of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks. Recent efforts have advanced PRMs from step-level to token-level granularity by integrating reward modeling into the training of generative models, with reward scores derived from token generation probabilities. However, the conflict between generative language modeling and reward modeling may introduce instability and lead to inaccurate credit assignments. To address this challenge, we revisit token-level reward assignment by decoupling reward modeling from language generation and derive a token-level reward model through the optimization of a discriminative policy, termed the Q-function Reward Model (Q-RM). We theoretically demonstrate that Q-RM explicitly learns token-level Q-functions from preference data without relying on fine-grained annotations. In our experiments, Q-RM consistently outperforms all baseline methods across various benchmarks.
For example, when integrated into PPO/REINFORCE algorithms, Q-RM enhances the average Pass@1 score by 5.85/4.70 points on mathematical reasoning tasks compared to the ORM baseline, and by 4.56/5.73 points compared to the token-level PRM counterpart. Moreover, reinforcement learning with Q-RM significantly enhances training efficiency, achieving convergence 12× faster than ORM on GSM8K and 11× faster than step-level PRM on MATH. Code and data are available at https://github.com/homzer/Q-RM. Hongzhan Chen, Tao Yang 0033, Shiping Gao, Ruijun Chen 0001, Xiaojun Quan, Hongtao Tian |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | Lookahead Routing for Large Language ModelsabstractLarge language model (LLM) routers improve the efficiency of multi-model systems by directing each query to the most appropriate model while leveraging the diverse strengths of heterogeneous LLMs. Most existing approaches frame routing as a classification problem based solely on the input query. While this reduces overhead by avoiding inference across all models, it overlooks valuable information that could be gleaned from potential outputs and fails to capture implicit intent or contextual nuances that often emerge only during response generation. These limitations can result in suboptimal routing decisions, particularly for complex or ambiguous queries that require deeper semantic understanding. To address this challenge, we propose Lookahead, a routing framework that "foresees" potential model outputs by predicting their latent representations and uses these predictions to guide model selection, thus enabling more informed routing without full inference. Within this framework, we implement two approaches based on causal and masked language models. Empirical evaluations across seven public benchmarks—spanning instruction following, mathematical reasoning, and code generation—show that Lookahead consistently outperforms existing routing baselines, achieving an average performance gain of 7.7\% over the state-of-the-art. Our code is available at https://github.com/huangcb01/lookahead-routing. Canbin Huang, Tianyuan Shi, Yuhua Zhu, Ruijun Chen 0001, Xiaojun Quan |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | Learning to Memorize Entailment and Discourse Relations for Persona-Consistent DialoguesabstractMaintaining engagement and consistency is particularly important in dialogue systems. Existing works have improved the performance of dialogue systems by intentionally learning interlocutor personas with sophisticated network structures. One issue with this approach is that it requires more personal corpora with annotations. Additionally, these models typically perform the next utterance prediction to generate a response but neglect the discourse coherence in the entire conversation. To address these issues, this study proposes a method of learning to memorize entailment and discourse relations for persona-consistent dialogue tasks. Entailment text pairs in natural language inference dataset were applied to learn latent entailment relations as external memories by premise-to-hypothesis generation task. Furthermore, an internal memory with a similar architecture was applied to the discourse information in the dialogue. Placing orthogonality restrictions on these two memory spaces ensures that the latent entailment relations remain dialogue-independent. Both memories collaborate to obtain entailment and discourse representation for the generation, allowing a deeper understanding of both consistency and coherence. Experiments on two large public datasets, PersonaChat and DSTC7-AVSD, demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method. Both automatic and human evaluations indicate that the proposed model outperforms several strong baselines in terms of both persona consistency and response coherence. Our source code is availabled at https://github.com/Chenrj233/LMEDR. Ruijun Chen 0001, Jin Wang 0008, Liang-Chih Yu, Xuejie Zhang 0002 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Decoupled variational autoencoder with interactive attention for affective text generation
Ruijun Chen 0001, Jin Wang 0008, Liang-Chih Yu, Xuejie Zhang 0002 |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Variational Autoencoder with Interactive Attention for Affective Text Generation
Ruijun Chen 0001, Jin Wang 0008, Xuejie Zhang 0002 |
NLPCC (2) | 1 |