Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samarth Aggarwal

dblp:254/7905 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 70% Language models and text generation · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 6%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
open information extraction
1.232020
OpenIE6: Iterative Grid Labeling and Coordination Analysis for Open Information Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2020
IMoJIE: Iterative Memory-Based Joint Open Information Extraction · ACL 2020
CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IE · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text representation › syntactic representation
coordination structure
0.412020
OpenIE6: Iterative Grid Labeling and Coordination Analysis for Open Information Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
crowdsourced annotation
0.112019
CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IE · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft constraints · 0.4sequence labeling · 0.4copy attention · 0.4BERT · 0.4crowdsourcing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 IMoJIE: Iterative Memory-Based Joint Open Information Extraction
abstract
While traditional systems for Open Information Extraction were statistical and rule-based, recently neural models have been introduced for the task.Our work builds upon CopyAttention, a sequence generation OpenIE model (Cui et al., 2018).Our analysis reveals that CopyAttention produces a constant number of extractions per sentence, and its extracted tuples often express redundant information.We present IMOJIE, an extension to Copy-Attention, which produces the next extraction conditioned on all previously extracted tuples.This approach overcomes both shortcomings of CopyAttention, resulting in a variable number of diverse extractions per sentence.We train IMOJIE on training data bootstrapped from extractions of several non-neural systems, which have been automatically filtered to reduce redundancy and noise.IMOJIE outperforms CopyAttention by about 18 F1 pts, and a BERT-based strong baseline by 2 F1 pts, establishing a new state of the art for the task.
Keshav Kolluru, Samarth Aggarwal, Vipul Rathore, Mausam, Soumen Chakrabarti
ACL2
2020 OpenIE6: Iterative Grid Labeling and Coordination Analysis for Open Information Extraction
abstract
A recent state-of-the-art neural open information extraction (OpenIE) system generates extractions iteratively, requiring repeated encoding of partial outputs.This comes at a significant computational cost.On the other hand, sequence labeling approaches for OpenIE are much faster, but worse in extraction quality.In this paper, we bridge this trade-off by presenting an iterative labeling-based system that establishes a new state of the art for OpenIE, while extracting 10× faster.This is achieved through a novel Iterative Grid Labeling (IGL) architecture, which treats OpenIE as a 2-D grid labeling task.We improve its performance further by applying coverage (soft) constraints on the grid at training time.Moreover, on observing that the best OpenIE systems falter at handling coordination structures, our OpenIE system also incorporates a new coordination analyzer built with the same IGL architecture.This IGL based coordination analyzer helps our OpenIE system handle complicated coordination structures, while also establishing a new state of the art on the task of coordination analysis, with a 12.3 pts improvement in F1 over previous analyzers.Our OpenIE system, OpenIE6 1 , beats the previous systems by as much as 4 pts in F1, while being much faster.
Keshav Kolluru, Vaibhav Adlakha, Samarth Aggarwal, Mausam, Soumen Chakrabarti
EMNLP (1)3
2020 Goal-driven Command Recommendations for Analysts
abstract
Recent times have seen data analytics software applications become an integral part of the decision-making process of analysts. The users of these software applications generate a vast amount of unstructured log data. These logs contain clues to the user’s goals, which traditional recommender systems may find difficult to model implicitly from the log data. With this assumption, we would like to assist the analytics process of a user through command recommendations. We categorize the commands into software and data categories based on their purpose to fulfill the task at hand. On the premise that the sequence of commands leading up to a data command is a good predictor of the latter, we design, develop, and validate various sequence modeling techniques. In this paper, we propose a framework to provide goal-driven data command recommendations to the user by leveraging unstructured logs. We use the log data of a web-based analytics software to train our neural network models and quantify their performance, in comparison to relevant and competitive baselines. We propose a custom loss function to tailor the recommended data commands according to the goal information provided exogenously. We also propose an evaluation metric that captures the degree of goal orientation of the recommendations. We demonstrate the promise of our approach by evaluating the models with the proposed metric and showcasing the robustness of our models in the case of adversarial examples, where the user activity is misaligned with selected goal, through offline evaluation.
Samarth Aggarwal, Rohin Garg, Abhilasha Sancheti, Bhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Iftikhar Ahamath Burhanuddin
RecSys1
2019 CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IE
abstract
Sangnie Bhardwaj, Samarth Aggarwal, Mausam Mausam. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Sangnie Bhardwaj, Samarth Aggarwal, Mausam
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)2