Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sangnie Bhardwaj
dblp:254/8206
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Language models and text generation · 20% Learning paradigms · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › unsupervised learning
cycle-consistency learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Leveraging Unpaired Data for Vision-Language Generative Models via Cycle Consistency · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
multimodal generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Leveraging Unpaired Data for Vision-Language Generative Models via Cycle Consistency · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
information-theoretic objective |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality Metric · NeurIPS 2020 |
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality Metric · NeurIPS 2020 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
perceptual quality metric |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality Metric · NeurIPS 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
open information extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IE · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent variable inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
crowdsourced annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IE · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.9bottleneck architecture · 0.9attention · 0.9unsupervised learning · 0.9information theory · 0.9joint image-text encoder · 0.8cycle consistency · 0.8crowdsourcing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?abstractLarge autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts through attention layers. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents by minimally modifying the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck to prevent shortcuts and incentivize structured solutions. We compare it against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks and find that contrary to intuition and recent works, there is little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem. Sarthak Mittal, Eric Elmoznino, Léo Gagnon, Sangnie Bhardwaj, Guillaume Lajoie, Dhanya Sridhar |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Leveraging Unpaired Data for Vision-Language Generative Models via Cycle ConsistencyabstractCurrent vision-language generative models rely on expansive corpora of $\textit{paired}$ image-text data to attain optimal performance and generalization capabilities. However, automatically collecting such data (e.g. via large-scale web scraping) leads to low quality and poor image-text correlation, while human annotation is more accurate but requires significant manual effort and expense. We introduce $\textbf{ITIT}$ ($\textbf{I}$n$\textbf{T}$egrating $\textbf{I}$mage $\textbf{T}$ext): an innovative training paradigm grounded in the concept of cycle consistency which allows vision-language training on $\textit{unpaired}$ image and text data. ITIT is comprised of a joint image-text encoder with disjoint image and text decoders that enable bidirectional image-to-text and text-to-image generation in a single framework. During training, ITIT leverages a small set of paired image-text data to ensure its output matches the input reasonably well in both directions. Simultaneously, the model is also trained on much larger datasets containing only images or texts. This is achieved by enforcing cycle consistency between the original unpaired samples and the cycle-generated counterparts. For instance, it generates a caption for a given input image and then uses the caption to create an output image, and enforces similarity between the input and output images. Our experiments show that ITIT with unpaired datasets exhibits similar scaling behavior as using high-quality paired data. We demonstrate image generation and captioning performance on par with state-of-the-art text-to-image and image-to-text models with orders of magnitude fewer (only 3M) paired image-text data. Code will be released at https://github.com/LTH14/itit. Tianhong Li, Sangnie Bhardwaj, Yonglong Tian, Han Zhang 0010, Jarred Barber, Dina Katabi, Guillaume Lajoie, Huiwen Chang, Dilip Krishnan |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Perceptual Quality MetricabstractTractable models of human perception have proved to be challenging to build. Hand-designed models such as MS-SSIM remain popular predictors of human image quality judgements due to their simplicity and speed. Recent modern deep learning approaches can perform better, but they rely on supervised data which can be costly to gather: large sets of class labels such as ImageNet, image quality ratings, or both. We combine recent advances in information-theoretic objective functions with a computational architecture informed by the physiology of the human visual system and unsupervised training on pairs of video frames, yielding our Perceptual Information Metric (PIM). We show that PIM is competitive with supervised metrics on the recent and challenging BAPPS image quality assessment dataset and outperforms them in predicting the ranking of image compression methods in CLIC 2020. We also perform qualitative experiments using the ImageNet-C dataset, and establish that PIM is robust with respect to architectural details. Sangnie Bhardwaj, Ian Fischer, Jona Ballé, Troy T. Chinen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | CaRB: A Crowdsourced Benchmark for Open IEabstractSangnie Bhardwaj, Samarth Aggarwal, Mausam Mausam. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Sangnie Bhardwaj, Samarth Aggarwal, Mausam |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |