Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kostas Manioudakis

dblp:254/9207 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-6510-9889ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search interfaces
faceted search
0.412020
Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020
Information retrieval › ranking › preference ranking
object ranking
0.412020
Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020
Information retrieval
ranking
0.412020
Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020
Information retrieval
user interface design
0.112020
Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.4frequency-based ranking · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints
abstract
Faceted Search is a widely used interaction scheme in digital libraries, e-commerce, and recently also in Linked Data. Surprisingly, object ranking in the context of Faceted Search is not well studied in the literature. In this article, we propose an extension of the model with two parameters that enable specifying the desired answer size and the granularity of the sought object ranking. These parameters allow tackling the problem of too big or too small answers and can specify how refined the sought ranking should be. Then, we provide an algorithm that takes as input these parameters and by considering the hard-constraints (filters), the soft-constraints (preferences), as well as the statistical properties of the dataset (through various frequency-based ranking schemes), produces an object ranking that satisfies these parameters, in a transparent way for the user. Then, we present extensive simulation-based evaluation results that provide evidence that the proposed model also improves the answers and reduces the user’s cost. Finally, we propose GUI extensions that are required and present an implementation of the model.
Kostas Manioudakis, Yannis Tzitzikas
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.1