Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kostas Manioudakis
dblp:254/9207
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-6510-9889ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › search interfaces
faceted search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020 |
Information retrieval › ranking › preference ranking
object ranking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020 |
Information retrieval
user interface design |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size Constraints · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.4frequency-based ranking · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Faceted Search with Object Ranking and Answer Size ConstraintsabstractFaceted Search is a widely used interaction scheme in digital libraries, e-commerce, and recently also in Linked Data. Surprisingly, object ranking in the context of Faceted Search is not well studied in the literature. In this article, we propose an extension of the model with two parameters that enable specifying the desired answer size and the granularity of the sought object ranking. These parameters allow tackling the problem of too big or too small answers and can specify how refined the sought ranking should be. Then, we provide an algorithm that takes as input these parameters and by considering the hard-constraints (filters), the soft-constraints (preferences), as well as the statistical properties of the dataset (through various frequency-based ranking schemes), produces an object ranking that satisfies these parameters, in a transparent way for the user. Then, we present extensive simulation-based evaluation results that provide evidence that the proposed model also improves the answers and reduces the user’s cost. Finally, we propose GUI extensions that are required and present an implementation of the model. Kostas Manioudakis, Yannis Tzitzikas |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 1 |