We consider cyclic proof systems in which derivations are graphs rather than trees. Such systems typically come with a condition that isolates which derivations are admitted as proofs, known as the soundness condition. This soundness condition frequently takes the form of either a global trace condition, a property dependent on all infinite paths in the proof-graph, or a reset condition, a ‘local’ condition depending on the simple cycles only which, as a result, is typically stable under more proof transformations. In this article we present a general method for constructing cyclic proof systems with reset conditions from systems with global trace conditions. In contrast to previous approaches, this method of generation is entirely independent of logic's semantics, only relying on combinatorial aspects of the notion of ‘trace’ and ‘progress’. We apply this method to present reset proof systems for three cyclic proof systems from the literature: cyclic arithmetic, cyclic Gödel's T and cyclic tableaux for the modal μ-calculus.

Abstract Cyclic proof systems permit derivations that are finite graphs in contrast to conventional derivation trees. The soundness of such proofs is ensured by imposing a soundness condition on derivations. The most common such condition is the global trace condition (GTC), a condition on the infinite paths through the derivation graph. To give a uniform treatment of such cyclic proof systems, Brotherston proposed an abstract notion of trace. We extend Brotherston’s approach into a category theoretical rendition of cyclic derivations, advancing the framework in two ways: first, we introduce activation algebras which allow for a more natural formalisation of trace conditions in extant cyclic proof systems. Second, accounting for the composition of trace information allows us to derive novel results about cyclic proofs, such as introducing a Ramsey-style trace condition. Furthermore, we connect our notion of trace to automata theory and prove that verifying the GTC for abstract cyclic proofs with certain trace conditions is PSPACE-complete.

Abstract Dialogues are turn-taking games which model debates about the satisfaction of logical formulas. A novel variant played over first-order structures gives rise to a notion of first-order satisfaction. We study the induced notion of validity for classical and intuitionistic first-order logic in the constructive setting of the calculus of inductive constructions. We prove that such material dialogue semantics for classical first-order logic admits constructive soundness and completeness proofs, setting it apart from standard model-theoretic semantics of first-order logic. Furthermore, we prove that completeness with regard to intuitionistic material dialogues fails in both constructive and classical settings. As an alternative, we propose material dialogues played over Kripke structures. These Kripke material dialogues exhibit constructive completeness when restricting to the negative fragment. The results concerning classical material dialogues have been mechanized using the Coq interactive theorem prover.

Beckmann [1] derives bounds on the length of reduction chains of classes of simply typed λ-calculus terms which are exact up-to a constant factor in their highest exponent. Afshari et al. [2] obtain similar bounds on acyclic higher-order recursion schemes (HORS) by embedding them in the simply typed λ-calculus and applying Beckmann's result. In this article, we apply Beckmann's proof strategy directly to acyclic HORS, proving exactness of the bounds on reduction chain length and obtaining exact bounds on the size of languages generated by acyclic HORS.

Abstract We study various formulations of the completeness of first-order logic phrased in constructive type theory and mechanised in the Coq proof assistant. Specifically, we examine the completeness of variants of classical and intuitionistic natural deduction and sequent calculi with respect to model-theoretic, algebraic, and game-theoretic semantics. As completeness with respect to the standard model-theoretic semantics à la Tarski and Kripke is not readily constructive, we analyse connections of completeness theorems to Markov’s Principle and Weak Kőnig’s Lemma and discuss non-standard semantics admitting assumption-free completeness. We contribute a reusable Coq library for first-order logic containing all results covered in this paper.