Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alvin Y. Sukmadji
dblp:255/0693
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5383-037XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 84% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › sequences › sequence design
difference triangle sets |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Higher-Order Staircase Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › product codes
staircase codes |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Higher-Order Staircase Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › cyclic codes
BCH and Reed-Solomon codes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Performance-Complexity-Latency Trade-Offs of Concatenated RS-BCH Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
concatenated codes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Performance-Complexity-Latency Trade-Offs of Concatenated RS-BCH Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error probability analysis
frame error rate |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Performance-Complexity-Latency Trade-Offs of Concatenated RS-BCH Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
generating functions |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Performance-Complexity-Latency Trade-Offs of Concatenated RS-BCH Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative syndrome-domain decoding · 0.9coupled hamming component codes · 0.9pareto frontier · 0.8monte carlo simulation · 0.8generating functions · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Higher-Order Staircase CodesabstractWe generalize staircase codes and tiled diagonal zipper codes, preserving their key properties while allowing each coded symbol to be protected by arbitrarily many component codewords rather than only two. This generalization which we term “higher-order staircase codes” arises from the marriage of two distinct combinatorial objects: difference triangle sets and finite-geometric nets, which have typically been applied separately to code design. We demonstrate one possible realization of these codes, obtaining powerful, high-rate, low-error-floor, and low-complexity coding schemes based on simple iterative syndrome-domain decoding of coupled Hamming component codes. We anticipate that the proposed codes could improve performance–complexity–latency tradeoffs in high-throughput communications applications, most notably fiber-optic, in which classical staircase codes and zipper codes have been applied. We consider the construction of difference triangle sets having minimum scope and sum-of-lengths, which lead to memory-optimal realizations of higher-order staircase codes. These results also enable memory reductions for early families of convolutional codes constructed from difference triangle sets. Mohannad Shehadeh, Frank R. Kschischang, Alvin Y. Sukmadji, William Kingsford |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2024 | Performance-Complexity-Latency Trade-Offs of Concatenated RS-BCH CodesabstractUsing a generating function approach, a computationally tractable expression is derived to predict the frame error rate arising at the output of the binary symmetric channel when a number of outer Reed–Solomon codes are concatenated with a number of inner Bose–Ray-Chaudhuri–Hocquenghem codes, thereby obviating the need for time-consuming Monte Carlo simulations. Measuring (a) code performance via the gap to the Shannon limit, (b) decoding complexity via an estimate of the number of operations per decoded bit, and (c) decoding latency by the overall frame length, a code search is performed to determine the Pareto frontier for performance-complexity-latency trade-offs. Alvin Y. Sukmadji, Frank R. Kschischang |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |