Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yangkun Li

dblp:255/3544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7012-8275ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 60% Recommender systems · 40%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.712023
A Survey on Dropout Methods and Experimental Verification in Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.712023
A Survey on Dropout Methods and Experimental Verification in Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Information retrieval › ranking › context-aware ranking
intent-aware ranking
0.712023
Intent-aware Ranking Ensemble for Personalized Recommendation · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems › multi-objective optimization
multi-objective recommendation
0.712023
Intent-aware Ranking Ensemble for Personalized Recommendation · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems
neural recommendation
0.712023
A Survey on Dropout Methods and Experimental Verification in Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Information retrieval › ranking
rank aggregation
0.712023
Intent-aware Ranking Ensemble for Personalized Recommendation · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
ranking ensemble
0.712023
Intent-aware Ranking Ensemble for Personalized Recommendation · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical comparison · 1.3dropout · 1.3ranking ensemble · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Intent-aware Ranking Ensemble for Personalized Recommendation
abstract
Ranking ensemble is a critical component in real recommender systems. When a user visits a platform, the system will prepare several item lists, each of which is generally from a single behavior objective recommendation model. As multiple behavior intents, e.g., both clicking and buying some specific item category, are commonly concurrent in a user visit, it is necessary to integrate multiple single-objective ranking lists into one. However, previous work on rank aggregation mainly focused on fusing homogeneous item lists with the same objective while ignoring ensemble of heterogeneous lists ranked with different objectives with various user intents.
Jiayu Li 0001, Peijie Sun, Zhefan Wang 0001, Weizhi Ma, Yangkun Li, Min Zhang 0006, Zhoutian Feng, Daiyue Xue
SIGIR5
2023 A Survey on Dropout Methods and Experimental Verification in Recommendation
abstract
Overfitting is a common problem in machine learning, which means the model too closely fits the training data while performing poorly in the test data. Among various methods of coping with overfitting, dropout is one of the representative ways. From randomly dropping neurons to dropping neural structures, dropout has achieved great success in improving model performances. Although various dropout methods have been designed and widely applied in past years, their effectiveness, application scenarios, and contributions have not been comprehensively summarized and empirically compared by far. It is the right time to make a comprehensive survey. In this paper, we systematically review previous dropout methods and classify them into three major categories according to the stage where dropout operation is performed. Specifically, more than seventy dropout methods published in top AI conferences or journals (e.g., TKDE, KDD, TheWebConf, SIGIR) are involved. The designed taxonomy is easy to understand and capable of including new dropout methods. Then, we further discuss their application scenarios, connections, and contributions. To verify the effectiveness of distinct dropout methods, extensive experiments are conducted on recommendation scenarios with abundant heterogeneous information. Finally, we propose some open problems and potential research directions about dropout that worth to be further explored.
Yangkun Li, Weizhi Ma, Chong Chen 0001, Min Zhang 0006, Yiqun Liu 0001, Shaoping Ma, Yuekui Yang
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2019 2-D analytical winding losses model of micro-inductor
abstract
Since the magnetic field distribution in winding window of thin film micro-inductor with closed magnetic core has obvious 2-D characteristics, the accuracy of 1-D analytical model for its winding AC losses is poor. The magnetic field of the micro-inductor is analyzed deeply to show that its distribution along the winding edge does not change with frequency. According to the analysis result, the magnetic field strength around the winding edge is calculated with the Ampere's law. And the 2-D magnetic field is decomposed into an x component and y component in rectangular coordinates. Then based on the superposition and uniqueness law of magnetic field, a 2-D analytical winding losses model of thin film micro-inductor is proposed. Finally, the finite element analysis (FEA) simulation verified the loss model to have high accuracy under wide exciting current frequency and the loss model can be used easily.
Yangkun Li, Xingkui Mao, Jungao Zhu, Jiqing Dong, Zhe Zhang 0002
IECON1