Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alberto Rumi

dblp:255/3722 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7426-3012ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 55% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 16% Autonomous driving · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
adversarial environments
0.912025
Stochastic Shortest Path with Sparse Adversarial Costs · NeurIPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
stochastic shortest path
0.912025
Stochastic Shortest Path with Sparse Adversarial Costs · NeurIPS 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.912025
Stochastic Shortest Path with Sparse Adversarial Costs · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online mirror descent
0.912025
Stochastic Shortest Path with Sparse Adversarial Costs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › contextual bandit
adversarial contextual bandit
0.812024
Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit feedback
0.812024
Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.812024
Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.812024
Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice
0.812024
Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online mirror descent · 1.7negative entropy regularization · 1.7lr-norm regularization · 1.7specialist aggregation · 0.8confidence-rated predictors · 0.8EXP4 · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Stochastic Shortest Path with Sparse Adversarial Costs
abstract
We study the adversarial Stochastic Shortest Path (SSP) problem with sparse costs under full-information feedback. In the known transition setting, existing bounds based on Online Mirror Descent (OMD) with negative-entropy regularization scale with $\sqrt{\log S A}$, where $SA$ is the size of the state-action space. While we show that this is optimal in the worst-case, this bound fails to capture the benefits of sparsity when only a small number $M \ll SA$ of state-action pairs incur cost. In fact, we also show that the negative-entropy is inherently non-adaptive to sparsity: it provably incurs regret scaling with $\sqrt{\log S}$ on sparse problems. Instead, we propose a novel family of $\ell_r$-norm regularizers ($r \in (1,2)$) that adapts to the sparsity and achieves regret scaling with $\sqrt{\log M}$ instead of $\sqrt{\log SA}$. We show this is optimal via a matching lower bound, highlighting that $M$ captures the effective dimension of the problem instead of $SA$. Finally, in the unknown transition setting the benefits of sparsity are limited: we prove that even on sparse problems, the minimax regret for any learner scales polynomially with $SA$.
Emmeran Johnson, Alberto Rumi, Ciara Pike-Burke, Patrick Rebeschini
NeurIPS2
2024 Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Linear Contextual Bandits
abstract
We study best-of-both-worlds algorithms for $K$-armed linear contextual bandits. Our algorithms deliver near-optimal regret bounds in both the adversarial and stochastic regimes, without prior knowledge about the environment. In the stochastic regime, we achieve the polylogarithmic rate $\frac{(dK)^2\mathrm{poly}\!\log(dKT)}{\Delta_{\min}}$, where $\Delta_{\min}$ is the minimum suboptimality gap over the $d$-dimensional context space. In the adversarial regime, we obtain either the first-order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(dK\sqrt{L^*})$ bound, or the second-order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(dK\sqrt{\Lambda^*})$ bound, where $L^*$ is the cumulative loss of the best action and $\Lambda^*$ is a notion of the cumulative second moment for the losses incurred by the algorithm. Moreover, we develop an algorithm based on FTRL with Shannon entropy regularizer that does not require the knowledge of the inverse of the covariance matrix, and achieves a polylogarithmic regret in the stochastic regime while obtaining $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\big(dK\sqrt{T}\big)$ regret bounds in the adversarial regime.
Yuko Kuroki, Alberto Rumi, Taira Tsuchiya, Fabio Vitale, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
AISTATS2
2024 Sum-max Submodular Bandits
Stephen Pasteris, Alberto Rumi, Fabio Vitale, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
AISTATS2
2024 Bandits with Abstention under Expert Advice
abstract
We study the classic problem of prediction with expert advice under bandit feedback. Our model assumes that one action, corresponding to the learner's abstention from play, has no reward or loss on every trial. We propose the CBA (Confidence-rated Bandits with Abstentions) algorithm, which exploits this assumption to obtain reward bounds that can significantly improve those of the classical Exp4 algorithm. Our problem can be construed as the aggregation of confidence-rated predictors, with the learner having the option to abstain from play. We are the first to achieve bounds on the expected cumulative reward for general confidence-rated predictors. In the special case of specialists, we achieve a novel reward bound, significantly improving previous bounds of SpecialistExp (treating abstention as another action). We discuss how CBA can be applied to the problem of adversarial contextual bandits with the option of abstaining from selecting any action. We are able to leverage a wide range of inductive biases, outperforming previous approaches both theoretically and in preliminary experimental analysis. Additionally, we achieve a reduction in runtime from quadratic to almost linear in the number of contexts for the specific case of metric space contexts.
Stephen Pasteris, Alberto Rumi, Maximilian Thiessen, Shota Saito, Atsushi Miyauchi 0001, Fabio Vitale, Mark Herbster
NeurIPS2
2019 Assessment Techniques to Ensure Reliable Electrical Insulation for More Electric Transportation
abstract
Partial discharge testing of complete, low-voltage induction machines and dry-type convertor transformers for the More Electric Transportation is discussed. The current standard (i.e. IEC 60034-18-41, 60317-0-1 and 61378-1) offers very few answers to the new challenges posed to the insulating systems reliability of these increasingly electrified electrical machines. Based on tests performed on different kind of specimens and the literature, the most promising assessment technique to ensure a reliable insulation is based on optical sensors. In addition, this work seeks to give some precise, but simple, indications on how to take into account the effect of altitude and high frequency in the qualification of an insulation system for More Electric Transportation and the limits of the different standards involved are highlighted.
Luca Lusuardi, Alberto Rumi, Andrea Cavallini 0002
IECON2