Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marius Zeinhofer

dblp:255/5011 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5594-7766ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 69% Deep learning architectures and training · 31%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
1.942025
Position: Optimization in SciML Should Employ the Function Space Geometry · ICML 2024
Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient Descent · ICML 2023
Collapsing Taylor Mode Automatic Differentiation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
natural gradient descent
1.522025
Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomization · NeurIPS 2025
Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient Descent · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks
0.922024
Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient Descent · ICML 2023
Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
automatic differentiation
0.912025
Collapsing Taylor Mode Automatic Differentiation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.912025
Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
kronecker-factored approximate curvature
0.812024
Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.812024
Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural gradient · 4.3randomized taylor mode · 1.7nested backpropagation · 1.7forward laplacian · 1.7gauss-newton · 1.5first optimize then discretize · 1.5woodbury formula · 0.9subsampled projected-increment natural gradient descent · 0.9randomized algorithms · 0.9momentum · 0.9taylor-mode automatic differentiation · 0.8riemannian metric · 0.7newton direction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Collapsing Taylor Mode Automatic Differentiation
abstract
Computing partial differential equation (PDE) operators via nested backpropagation is expensive, yet popular, and severely restricts their utility for scientific machine learning. Recent advances, like the forward Laplacian and randomizing Taylor mode automatic differentiation (AD), propose forward schemes to address this. We introduce an optimization technique for Taylor mode that 'collapses' derivatives by rewriting the computational graph, and demonstrate how to apply it to general linear PDE operators, and randomized Taylor mode. The modifications simply require propagating a sum up the computational graph, which could---or should---be done by a machine learning compiler, without exposing complexity to users. We implement our collapsing procedure and evaluate it on popular PDE operators, confirming it accelerates Taylor mode and outperforms nested backpropagation.
Felix Dangel, Tim Siebert, Marius Zeinhofer, Andrea Walther
NeurIPS3
2025 Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomization
abstract
Natural gradient methods significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), but are often prohibitively costly. We introduce a suite of techniques to improve the accuracy and efficiency of energy natural gradient descent (ENGD) for PINNs. First, we leverage the Woodbury formula to dramatically reduce the computational complexity of ENGD. Second, we adapt the Subsampled Projected-Increment Natural Gradient Descent algorithm from the variational Monte Carlo literature to accelerate the convergence. Third, we explore the use of randomized algorithms to further reduce the computational cost in the case of large batch sizes. We find that randomization accelerates progress in the early stages of training for low-dimensional problems, and we identify key barriers to attaining acceleration in other scenarios. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our methods outperform previous approaches, achieving the same $L^2$ error as the original ENGD up to $75\times$ faster.
Andrés Guzmán-Cordero, Felix Dangel, Gil Goldshlager, Marius Zeinhofer
NeurIPS4
2024 Position: Optimization in SciML Should Employ the Function Space Geometry
abstract
We provide an infinite-dimensional view on optimization problems encountered in scientific machine learning (SciML) and advocate for the paradigm first optimize, then discretize for their solution. This amounts to first choosing an appropriate infinite-dimensional algorithm which is then discretized in a second step. To illustrate this point, we discuss recently proposed state-of-the-art algorithms for SciML applications and see that they can be derived within this framework. Hence, this perspective allows for a principled guide for the design of optimization algorithms for SciML. As the infinite-dimensional viewpoint is presently underdeveloped we formalize it here to foster the development of novel optimization algorithms.
Marius Zeinhofer
ICML2
2024 Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are infamous for being hard to train. Recently, second-order methods based on natural gradient and Gauss-Newton methods have shown promising performance, improving the accuracy achieved by first-order methods by several orders of magnitude. While promising, the proposed methods only scale to networks with a few thousand parameters due to the high computational cost to evaluate, store, and invert the curvature matrix. We propose Kronecker-factored approximate curvature (KFAC) for PINN losses that greatly reduces the computational cost and allows scaling to much larger networks. Our approach goes beyond the popular KFAC for traditional deep learning problems as it captures contributions from a PDE's differential operator that are crucial for optimization. To establish KFAC for such losses, we use Taylor-mode automatic differentiation to describe the differential operator's computation graph as a forward network with shared weights which allows us to apply a variant of KFAC for networks with weight-sharing. Empirically, we find that our KFAC-based optimizers are competitive with expensive second-order methods on small problems, scale more favorably to higher-dimensional neural networks and PDEs, and consistently outperform first-order methods.
Felix Dangel, Marius Zeinhofer
NeurIPS3
2023 Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient Descent
abstract
We propose energy natural gradient descent, a natural gradient method with respect to a Hessian-induced Riemannian metric as an optimization algorithm for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and the deep Ritz method. As a main motivation we show that the update direction in function space resulting from the energy natural gradient corresponds to the Newton direction modulo an orthogonal projection on the model's tangent space. We demonstrate experimentally that energy natural gradient descent yields highly accurate solutions with errors several orders of magnitude smaller than what is obtained when training PINNs with standard optimizers like gradient descent or Adam, even when those are allowed significantly more computation time.
Marius Zeinhofer
ICML2