EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marta Skreta
dblp:255/5167
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 31% Optimization for machine learning · 21% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 The Superposition of Diffusion Models Using the Itô Density Estimator · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
evolutionary computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
inference-time guidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model composition
pre-trained model composition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Superposition of Diffusion Models Using the Itô Density Estimator · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › neural network interpretability
superposition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Superposition of Diffusion Models Using the Itô Density Estimator · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecule discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Sober Look at LLMs for Material Discovery: Are They Actually Good for Bayesian Optimization Over Molecules? · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equilibrium models
deep equilibrium model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Sober Look at LLMs for Material Discovery: Are They Actually Good for Bayesian Optimization Over Molecules? · ICML 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Experts · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.5evolutionary algorithm · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 0.9itô density estimator · 0.9hutchinson's estimator · 0.9feynman-kac formula · 0.9diffusion SDE · 0.9annealing · 0.9variational quantum algorithm · 0.8root solving · 0.8parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.8deep equilibrium model · 0.8bayesian neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Superposition of Diffusion Models Using the Itô Density EstimatorabstractThe Cambrian explosion of easily accessible pre-trained diffusion models suggests a demand for methods that combine multiple different pre-trained diffusion models without incurring the significant computational burden of re-training a larger combined model. In this paper, we cast the problem of combining multiple pre-trained diffusion models at the generation stage under a novel proposed framework termed superposition. Theoretically, we derive superposition from rigorous first principles stemming from the celebrated continuity equation and design two novel algorithms tailor-made for combining diffusion models in SuperDiff. SuperDiff leverages a new scalable Itô density estimator for the log likelihood of the diffusion SDE which incurs *no additional overhead* compared to the well-known Hutchinson's estimator needed for divergence calculations. We demonstrate that SuperDiff is scalable to large pre-trained diffusion models as superposition is performed *solely through composition during inference*, and also enjoys painless implementation as it combines different pre-trained vector fields through an automated re-weighting scheme. Notably, we show that SuperDiff is efficient during inference time, and mimics traditional composition operators such as the logical OR and the logical AND. We empirically demonstrate the utility of using SuperDiff for generating more diverse images on CIFAR-10, more faithful prompt conditioned image editing using Stable Diffusion, as well as improved conditional molecule generation and unconditional *de novo* structure design of proteins. https://github.com/necludov/super-diffusion Marta Skreta, Lazar Atanackovic, Joey Bose, Alexander Tong 0001, Kirill Neklyudov |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Efficient Evolutionary Search Over Chemical Space with Large Language ModelsabstractMolecular discovery, when formulated as an optimization problem, presents significant computational challenges because optimization objectives can be non-differentiable. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), often used to optimize black-box objectives in molecular discovery, traverse chemical space by performing random mutations and crossovers, leading to a large number of expensive objective evaluations. In this work, we ameliorate this shortcoming by incorporating chemistry-aware Large Language Models (LLMs) into EAs. Namely, we redesign crossover and mutation operations in EAs using LLMs trained on large corpora of chemical information. We perform extensive empirical studies on both commercial and open-source models on multiple tasks involving property optimization, molecular rediscovery, and structure-based drug design, demonstrating that the joint usage of LLMs with EAs yields superior performance over all baseline models across single- and multi-objective settings. We demonstrate that our algorithm improves both the quality of the final solution and convergence speed, thereby reducing the number of required objective evaluations. Haorui Wang, Marta Skreta, Cher Tian Ser, Wenhao Gao 0001, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff, Chenru Duan, Yuchen Zhuang, Yue Yu 0001, Yanqiao Zhu 0001, Yuanqi Du, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Kirill Neklyudov, Chao Zhang 0014 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of ExpertsabstractWhile score-based generative models are the model of choice across diverse domains, there are limited tools available for controlling inference-time behavior in a principled manner, e.g. for composing multiple pretrained models. Existing classifier-free guidance methods use a simple heuristic to mix conditional and unconditional scores to approximately sample from conditional distributions. However, such methods do not approximate the intermediate distributions, necessitating additional ‘corrector’ steps. In this work, we provide an efficient and principled method for sampling from a sequence of annealed, geometric-averaged, or product distributions derived from pretrained score-based models. We derive a weighted simulation scheme which we call Feynman-Kac Correctors (FKCs) based on the celebrated Feynman-Kac formula by carefully accounting for terms in the appropriate partial differential equations (PDEs). To simulate these PDEs, we propose Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) resampling algorithms that leverage inference-time scaling to improve sampling quality. We empirically demonstrate the utility of our methods by proposing amortized sampling via inference-time temperature annealing, improving multi-objective molecule generation using pretrained models, and improving classifier-free guidance for text-to-image generation. Marta Skreta, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Viktor Ohanesian, Roberto Bondesan, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Arnaud Doucet, Rob Brekelmans, Alexander Tong 0001, Kirill Neklyudov |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | A Sober Look at LLMs for Material Discovery: Are They Actually Good for Bayesian Optimization Over Molecules?abstractAutomation is one of the cornerstones of contemporary material discovery. Bayesian optimization (BO) is an essential part of such workflows, enabling scientists to leverage prior domain knowledge into efficient exploration of a large molecular space. While such prior knowledge can take many forms, there has been significant fanfare around the ancillary scientific knowledge encapsulated in large language models (LLMs). However, existing work thus far has only explored LLMs for heuristic materials searches. Indeed, recent work obtains the uncertainty estimate---an integral part of BO---from point-estimated, _non-Bayesian_ LLMs. In this work, we study the question of whether LLMs are actually useful to accelerate principled _Bayesian_ optimization in the molecular space. We take a sober, dispassionate stance in answering this question. This is done by carefully (i) viewing LLMs as fixed feature extractors for standard but principled BO surrogate models and by (ii) leveraging parameter-efficient finetuning methods and Bayesian neural networks to obtain the posterior of the LLM surrogate. Our extensive experiments with real-world chemistry problems show that LLMs can be useful for BO over molecules, but only if they have been pretrained or finetuned with domain-specific data. Agustinus Kristiadi, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff, Marta Skreta, Pascal Poupart, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Geoff Pleiss |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Quantum Deep Equilibrium ModelsabstractThe feasibility of variational quantum algorithms, the most popular correspondent of neural networks on noisy, near-term quantum hardware, is highly impacted by the circuit depth of the involved parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs). Higher depth increases expressivity, but also results in a detrimental accumulation of errors. Furthermore, the number of parameters involved in the PQC significantly influences the performance through the necessary number of measurements to evaluate gradients, which scales linearly with the number of parameters.
Motivated by this, we look at deep equilibrium models (DEQs), which mimic an infinite-depth, weight-tied network using a fraction of the memory by employing a root solver to find the fixed points of the network. In this work, we present Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models (QDEQs): a training paradigm that learns parameters of a quantum machine learning model given by a PQC using DEQs. To our knowledge, no work has yet explored the application of DEQs to QML models. We apply QDEQs to find the parameters of a quantum circuit in two settings: the first involves classifying MNIST-4 digits with 4 qubits; the second extends it to 10 classes of MNIST, FashionMNIST and CIFAR. We find that QDEQ is not only competitive with comparable existing baseline models, but also achieves higher performance than a network with 5 times more layers. This demonstrates that the QDEQ paradigm can be used to develop significantly more shallow quantum circuits for a given task, something which is essential for the utility of near-term quantum computers.
Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/martaskrt/qdeq}. Philipp Schleich, Marta Skreta, Lasse Bjørn Kristensen, Rodrigo A. Vargas-Hernández, Alán Aspuru-Guzik |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Predicting Obstructive Hydronephrosis Based on Ultrasound Alone
Lauren Erdman, Marta Skreta, Mandy Rickard, Carson McLean, Aziz Mezlini, Daniel T. Keefe, Anne-Sophie Blais, Michael Brudno, Armando J. Lorenzo, Anna Goldenberg |
MICCAI (3) | 2 |