Aditya Kashi

dblp:255/5234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2589-3792ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Mixed-precision numerics in scientific applications: survey and perspectives
abstract
Abstract The explosive demand for artificial intelligence (AI) workloads has led to a significant increase in silicon area dedicated to lower-precision computations on recent high-performance computing hardware designs. However, mixed-precision capabilities, which can achieve performance improvements of up to 8 $$\times$$ × compared to double-precision in extreme compute-intensive workloads, remain largely untapped in most scientific applications. A growing number of efforts have shown that mixed-precision algorithmic innovations can deliver superior performance without sacrificing accuracy. These developments should prompt computational scientists to seriously consider whether their scientific modeling and simulation applications could benefit from the acceleration offered by new hardware and mixed-precision algorithms. In this survey, we (1) review progress across diverse scientific domains—fluid dynamics, weather and climate, quantum chemistry, and computational genomics—that have begun adopting mixed-precision strategies; (2) examine state-of-the-art algorithmic techniques such as iterative refinement, splitting and emulation schemes, and adaptive precision solvers; (3) assess their implications for accuracy, performance, and resource utilization; and (4) survey the emerging software ecosystem that enables mixed-precision methods at scale. We conclude with perspectives and recommendations on cross-cutting opportunities, domain-specific challenges, and the role of co-design between application scientists, numerical analysts, and computer scientists. Collectively, this survey underscores that mixed-precision numerics can reshape computational science by aligning algorithms with the evolving landscape of hardware capabilities.
Aditya Kashi, Hao Lu 0001, Wesley Brewer, David Rogers, Michael A. Matheson, Mallikarjun Shankar, Feiyi Wang
J. Supercomput.1
2025 Insights from Optimizing HPL Performance on Exascale Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Panel Factorization
abstract
High performance LINPACK (HPL) remains the primary benchmark for evaluating supercomputing performance. It includes many parts with substantial internal complexity, and its performance is affected by a large number of parameters that interact in ways that are difficult to predict on large-scale heterogeneous supercomputer systems. We present a comprehensive performance analysis of HPL on Frontier, the world’s first exascale supercomputer, which achieved HPL performance of 1.35 exaflops. Through empirical parameter tuning, detailed modeling, and comparative evaluation, we uncover critical performance insights, share lessons learned, and outline best practices for effective parameter tuning on exascale systems. We introduce and evaluate two novel PDFACT strategies: a dedicated-thread (DT) variant and a GPU-based variant (GPUPDFACT) implementation using HIP cooperative groups, demonstrating that GPU-based factorization outperforms conventional CPU-based PDFACT on Frontier’s architecture. Our findings establish key performance factors for HPL on exascale systems and offer valuable guidance for future high-performance computing and benchmarking efforts.
Hao Lu 0001, Michael A. Matheson, Noel Chalmers, Aditya Kashi, Nicholas Malaya, Feiyi Wang
SC4
2025 Scaling the memory wall using mixed-precision - HPG-MxP on an exascale machine
abstract
Mixed-precision algorithms have been proposed as a way for scientific computing to benefit from some of the gains seen for artificial intelligence (AI) on recent high performance computing (HPC) platforms. A few applications dominated by dense matrix operations have seen substantial speedups by utilizing low precision formats such as FP16. However, a majority of scientific simulation applications are memory bandwidth limited. Beyond preliminary studies, the practical gain from using mixed-precision algorithms on a given HPC system is largely unclear.
Aditya Kashi, Nicholson Koukpaizan, Hao Lu 0001, Michael A. Matheson, Sarp Oral, Feiyi Wang
SC1
2023 Integrating batched sparse iterative solvers for the collision operator in fusion plasma simulations on GPUs
Aditya Kashi, Pratik Nayak, Dhruva Kulkarni, Aaron Scheinberg, Paul Lin, Hartwig Anzt
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.1
2022 Batched sparse iterative solvers on GPU for the collision operator for fusion plasma simulations
abstract
Batched linear solvers, which solve many small related but independent problems, are important in several applications. This is increasingly the case for highly parallel processors such as graphics processing units (GPUs), which need a substantial amount of work to keep them operating efficiently and solving smaller problems one-by-one is not an option. Because of the small size of each problem, the task of coming up with a parallel partitioning scheme and mapping the problem to hardware is not trivial. In recent history, significant attention has been given to batched dense linear algebra. However, there is also an interest in utilizing sparse iterative solvers in a batched form, and this presents further challenges. An example use case is found in a gyrokinetic Particle-In-Cell (PIC) code used for modeling magnetically confined fusion plasma devices. The collision operator has been identified as a bottleneck, and a proxy app has been created for facilitating optimizations and porting to GPUs. The current collision kernel linear solver does not run on the GPU-a major bottleneck. As these matrices are well-conditioned, batched iterative sparse solvers are an attractive option. A batched sparse iterative solver capability has recently been developed in the Ginkgo library. In this paper, we describe how the software architecture can be used to develop an efficient solution for the XGC collision proxy app. Comparisons for the solve times on NVIDIA V100 and A100 GPUs and AMD MI100 GPUs with one dual-socket Intel Xeon Skylake CPU node with 40 OpenMP threads are presented for matrices representative of those required in the collision kernel of XGC. The results suggest that GINKGO's batched sparse iterative solvers are well suited for efficient utilization of the GPU for this problem, and the performance portability of Ginkgo in conjunction with Kokkos (used within XGC as the heterogeneous programming model) allows seamless execution for exascale oriented heterogeneous architectures at the various leadership supercomputing facilities.
Aditya Kashi, Pratik Nayak, Dhruva Kulkarni, Aaron Scheinberg, Paul Lin, Hartwig Anzt
IPDPS1