Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anselm Paulus
dblp:255/5245
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 54% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Graph learning · 12% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
differentiable optimization |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | LPGD: A General Framework for Backpropagation through Embedded Optimization Layers · ICML 2024 Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Works · ICLR 2023 Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solvers · ICLR 2020 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › large language model attack
adversarial prompts |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
gradient-based training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LPGD: A General Framework for Backpropagation through Embedded Optimization Layers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Works · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Works · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit differentiation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Works · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CombOptNet: Fit the Right NP-Hard Problem by Learning Integer Programming Constraints · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
deep graph matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solvers · ECCV (28) 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solvers · ECCV (28) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Rank-Based Metrics With Blackbox Differentiation · CVPR 2020 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Rank-Based Metrics With Blackbox Differentiation · CVPR 2020 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Rank-Based Metrics With Blackbox Differentiation · CVPR 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solvers · ICLR 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal gradient method |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LPGD: A General Framework for Backpropagation through Embedded Optimization Layers · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | CombOptNet: Fit the Right NP-Hard Problem by Learning Integer Programming Constraints · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solvers · ECCV (28) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
blackbox differentiation · 2.6large language model · 1.7alternating optimization · 1.7adversarial suffix generation · 1.7stochastic gradient descent · 1.5lagrangian proximal gradient descent · 1.5automatic differentiation · 1.5feature extraction · 1.0identity projection · 0.7backpropagation through combinatorial algorithms · 0.7neural network · 0.5integer programming solver · 0.5mini-batch gradient descent · 0.4combinatorial solver · 0.4average precision loss · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to **jailbreaking attacks** that lead to generation of inappropriate or harmful content.
Manual red-teaming requires a time-consuming search for adversarial prompts, whereas automatic adversarial prompt generation often leads to semantically meaningless attacks that do not scale well.
In this paper, we present a novel method that uses another LLM, called **AdvPrompter**, to generate human-readable adversarial prompts in seconds.
AdvPrompter, which is trained using an alternating optimization algorithm, generates suffixes that veil the input instruction without changing its meaning, such that the TargetLLM is lured to give a harmful response.
Experimental results on popular open source TargetLLM show highly competitive results on the AdvBench and HarmBench datasets, that also transfer to closed-source black-box LLMs.
We also show that training on adversarial suffixes generated by AdvPrompter is a promising strategy for improving the robustness of LLMs to jailbreaking attacks. Anselm Paulus, Arman Zharmagambetov, Chuan Guo 0001, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | LPGD: A General Framework for Backpropagation through Embedded Optimization LayersabstractEmbedding parameterized optimization problems as layers into machine learning architectures serves as a powerful inductive bias. Training such architectures with stochastic gradient descent requires care, as degenerate derivatives of the embedded optimization problem often render the gradients uninformative. We propose Lagrangian Proximal Gradient Descent (LPGD), a flexible framework for training architectures with embedded optimization layers that seamlessly integrates into automatic differentiation libraries. LPGD efficiently computes meaningful replacements of the degenerate optimization layer derivatives by re-running the forward solver oracle on a perturbed input. LPGD captures various previously proposed methods as special cases, while fostering deep links to traditional optimization methods. We theoretically analyze our method and demonstrate on historical and synthetic data that LPGD converges faster than gradient descent even in a differentiable setup. Anselm Paulus, Georg Martius, Vít Musil |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Works
Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Anselm Paulus, Marin Vlastelica Pogancic, Vít Musil, Volodymyr Kuleshov, Georg Martius |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | CombOptNet: Fit the Right NP-Hard Problem by Learning Integer Programming ConstraintsabstractBridging logical and algorithmic reasoning with modern machine learning techniques is a fundamental challenge with potentially transformative impact. On the algorithmic side, many NP-hard problems can be expressed as integer programs, in which the constraints play the role of their ’combinatorial specification’. In this work, we aim to integrate integer programming solvers into neural network architectures as layers capable of learning both the cost terms and the constraints. The resulting end-to-end trainable architectures jointly extract features from raw data and solve a suitable (learned) combinatorial problem with state-of-the-art integer programming solvers. We demonstrate the potential of such layers with an extensive performance analysis on synthetic data and with a demonstration on a competitive computer vision keypoint matching benchmark. Anselm Paulus, Michal Rolínek, Vít Musil, Brandon Amos, Georg Martius |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Optimizing Rank-Based Metrics With Blackbox DifferentiationabstractRank-based metrics are some of the most widely used criteria for performance evaluation of computer vision models. Despite years of effort, direct optimization for these metrics remains a challenge due to their non-differentiable and non-decomposable nature. We present an efficient, theoretically sound, and general method for differentiating rank-based metrics with mini-batch gradient descent. In addition, we address optimization instability and sparsity of the supervision signal that both arise from using rank-based metrics as optimization targets. Resulting losses based on recall and Average Precision are applied to image retrieval and object detection tasks. We obtain performance that is competitive with state-of-the-art on standard image retrieval datasets and consistently improve performance of near state-of-the-art object detectors. Michal Rolínek, Vít Musil, Anselm Paulus, Marin Vlastelica Pogancic, Claudio Michaelis, Georg Martius |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2020 | Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial SolversabstractBuilding on recent progress at the intersection of combinatorial optimization and deep learning, we propose an end-to-end trainable architecture for deep graph matching that contains unmodified combinatorial solvers. Using the presence of heavily optimized combinatorial solvers together with some improvements in architecture design, we advance state-of-the-art on deep graph matching benchmarks for keypoint correspondence. In addition, we highlight the conceptual advantages of incorporating solvers into deep learning architectures, such as the possibility of post-processing with a strong multi-graph matching solver or the indifference to changes in the training setting. Finally, we propose two new challenging experimental setups. The code is available at https://github.com/martius-lab/blackbox-deep-graph-matching Michal Rolínek, Paul Swoboda, Dominik Zietlow, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius |
ECCV (28) | 4 |
| 2020 | Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solvers
Marin Vlastelica Pogancic, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius, Michal Rolínek |
ICLR | 2 |