Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Giyoung Jeon
dblp:255/5441
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-1805-1135ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 96% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Beyond Single Path Integrated Gradients for Reliable Input Attribution via Randomized Path Sampling · ICCV 2023 Distilled Gradient Aggregation: Purify Features for Input Attribution in the Deep Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Beyond Single Path Integrated Gradients for Reliable Input Attribution via Randomized Path Sampling · ICCV 2023 Distilled Gradient Aggregation: Purify Features for Input Attribution in the Deep Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Relationship Between Populated Regions and Adversarial Robustness in Deep Neural Networks · ICDM 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Relationship Between Populated Regions and Adversarial Robustness in Deep Neural Networks · ICDM 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
integrated gradients |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Single Path Integrated Gradients for Reliable Input Attribution via Randomized Path Sampling · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
gradient-based attribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distilled Gradient Aggregation: Purify Features for Input Attribution in the Deep Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial training · 0.9stick-breaking process · 0.7randomized path sampling · 0.7integrated gradients · 0.6feature distillation · 0.6optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On the Relationship Between Populated Regions and Adversarial Robustness in Deep Neural NetworksabstractIn general, deep neural networks (DNNs) are evaluated by the generalization performance measured on unseen data excluded from the training phase. Along with the development of DNNs, the generalization performance converges to the state-of-the-art performances and it becomes difficult to evaluate DNNs solely based on this metric. The robustness against adversarial attack has been used as an additional metric to evaluate DNNs by measuring their vulnerability. However, few studies have been performed to analyze the adversarial robustness in terms of the geometry in DNNs. In this work, we perform an empirical study to analyze the internal properties of DNNs that affect model robustness under adversarial attacks. In particular, we propose the novel concept of the populated region set (PRS), where training samples are actually populated, to represent the internal properties of DNNs in a practical setting. From systematic experiments with the proposed concept, we provide empirical evidence to validate that a low PRS ratio has a strong relationship with the adversarial robustness of DNNs. We also devise a PRS regularizer leveraging the characteristics of PRS to improve the adversarial robustness without adversarial training. Seongjin Park, Haedong Jeong, Tair Djanibekov, Giyoung Jeon, Jinseok Seol, Jaesik Choi |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2024 | ReConPatch : Contrastive Patch Representation Learning for Industrial Anomaly DetectionabstractAnomaly detection is crucial to the advanced identification of product defects such as incorrect parts, misaligned components, and damages in industrial manufacturing. Due to the rare observations and unknown types of defects, anomaly detection is considered to be challenging in machine learning. To overcome this difficulty, recent approaches utilize the common visual representations pre-trained from natural image datasets and distill the relevant features. However, existing approaches still have the discrepancy between the pre-trained feature and the target data, or require the input augmentation which should be carefully designed, particularly for the industrial dataset. In this paper, we introduce ReConPatch, which constructs discriminative features for anomaly detection by training a linear modulation of patch features extracted from the pre-trained model. ReConPatch employs contrastive representation learning to collect and distribute features in a way that produces a target-oriented and easily separable representation. To address the absence of labeled pairs for the contrastive learning, we utilize two similarity measures between data representations, pairwise and contextual similarities, as pseudo-labels. Our method achieves the state-of-the-art anomaly detection performance (99.72%) for the widely used and challenging MVTec AD dataset. Additionally, we achieved a state-of-the-art anomaly detection performance (95.8%) for the BTAD dataset. Jeeho Hyun, Giyoung Jeon, Kyunghoon Bae, Byung Jun Kang |
WACV | 3 |
| 2023 | Beyond Single Path Integrated Gradients for Reliable Input Attribution via Randomized Path SamplingabstractInput attribution is a widely used explanation method for deep neural networks, especially in visual tasks. Among various attribution methods, Integrated Gradients (IG) [28] is frequently used because of its model-agnostic applicability and desirable axioms. However, previous work [24], [8], [9] has shown that such method often produces noisy and unreliable attributions during the integration of the gradients over the path defined in the input space. In this paper, we tackle this issue by estimating the distribution of the possible attributions according to the integrating path selection. We show that such noisy attribution can be reduced by aggregating attributions from the multiple paths instead of using a single path. Inspired by Stick-Breaking Process [20], we suggest a random process to generate rich and various sampling of the gradient integrating path. Using multiple input attributions obtained from randomized path, we propose a novel attribution measure using the distribution of attributions at each input features. We identify proposed method qualitatively show less-noisy and object-aligned attribution and its feasibility through the quantitative evaluations. Giyoung Jeon, Haedong Jeong, Jaesik Choi |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2022 | Distilled Gradient Aggregation: Purify Features for Input Attribution in the Deep Neural NetworkabstractMeasuring the attribution of input features toward the model output is one of the popular post-hoc explanations on the Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Among various approaches to compute the attribution, the gradient-based methods are widely used to generate attributions, because of its ease of implementation and the model-agnostic characteristic. However, existing gradient integration methods such as Integrated Gradients (IG) suffer from (1) the noisy attributions which cause the unreliability of the explanation, and (2) the selection for the integration path which determines the quality of explanations. FullGrad (FG) is an another approach to construct the reliable attributions by focusing the locality of piece-wise linear network with the bias gradient. Although FG has shown reasonable performance for the given input, as the shortage of the global property, FG is vulnerable to the small perturbation, while IG which includes the exploration over the input space is robust. In this work, we design a new input attribution method which adopt the strengths of both local and global attributions.In particular, we propose a novel approach to distill input features using weak and extremely positive contributor masks. We aggregate the intermediate local attributions obtained from the distillation sequence to provide reliable attribution. We perform the quantitative evaluation compared to various attribution methods and show that our method outperforms others. We also provide the qualitative result that our method obtains object-aligned and sharp attribution heatmap. Giyoung Jeon, Haedong Jeong, Jaesik Choi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | An Efficient Explorative Sampling Considering the Generative Boundaries of Deep Generative Neural NetworksabstractDeep generative neural networks (DGNNs) have achieved realistic and high-quality data generation. In particular, the adversarial training scheme has been applied to many DGNNs and has exhibited powerful performance. Despite of recent advances in generative networks, identifying the image generation mechanism still remains challenging. In this paper, we present an explorative sampling algorithm to analyze generation mechanism of DGNNs. Our method efficiently obtains samples with identical attributes from a query image in a perspective of the trained model. We define generative boundaries which determine the activation of nodes in the internal layer and probe inside the model with this information. To handle a large number of boundaries, we obtain the essential set of boundaries using optimization. By gathering samples within the region surrounded by generative boundaries, we can empirically reveal the characteristics of the internal layers of DGNNs. We also demonstrate that our algorithm can find more homogeneous, the model specific samples compared to the variations of ϵ-based sampling method. Giyoung Jeon, Haedong Jeong, Jaesik Choi |
AAAI | 1 |