Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Bréchet

dblp:255/5502 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 62% Learning theory · 38%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
deep linear networks
0.712023
Critical Points and Convergence Analysis of Generative Deep Linear Networks Trained with Bures-Wasserstein Loss · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.712023
Critical Points and Convergence Analysis of Generative Deep Linear Networks Trained with Bures-Wasserstein Loss · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.712023
Critical Points and Convergence Analysis of Generative Deep Linear Networks Trained with Bures-Wasserstein Loss · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.512021
When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.512021
When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
mode connectivity
0.512021
When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
over-parameterization
0.512021
When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks? · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient flow · 1.3gradient descent · 1.3bures-wasserstein distance · 1.3stochastic gradient descent · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Critical Points and Convergence Analysis of Generative Deep Linear Networks Trained with Bures-Wasserstein Loss
abstract
We consider a deep matrix factorization model of covariance matrices trained with the Bures-Wasserstein distance. While recent works have made advances in the study of the optimization problem for overparametrized low-rank matrix approximation, much emphasis has been placed on discriminative settings and the square loss. In contrast, our model considers another type of loss and connects with the generative setting. We characterize the critical points and minimizers of the Bures-Wasserstein distance over the space of rank-bounded matrices. The Hessian of this loss at low-rank matrices can theoretically blow up, which creates challenges to analyze convergence of gradient optimization methods. We establish convergence results for gradient flow using a smooth perturbative version of the loss as well as convergence results for finite step size gradient descent under certain assumptions on the initial weights.
Pierre Bréchet, Katerina Papagiannouli, Guido Montúfar
ICML1
2021 When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks?
abstract
The question of how and why the phenomenon of mode connectivity occurs in training deep neural networks has gained remarkable attention in the research community. From a theoretical perspective, two possible explanations have been proposed: (i) the loss function has connected sublevel sets, and (ii) the solutions found by stochastic gradient descent are dropout stable. While these explanations provide insights into the phenomenon, their assumptions are not always satisfied in practice. In particular, the first approach requires the network to have one layer with order of $N$ neurons ($N$ being the number of training samples), while the second one requires the loss to be almost invariant after removing half of the neurons at each layer (up to some rescaling of the remaining ones). In this work, we improve both conditions by exploiting the quality of the features at every intermediate layer together with a milder over-parameterization requirement. More specifically, we show that: (i) under generic assumptions on the features of intermediate layers, it suffices that the last two hidden layers have order of $\sqrt{N}$ neurons, and (ii) if subsets of features at each layer are linearly separable, then almost no over-parameterization is needed to show the connectivity. Our experiments confirm that the proposed condition ensures the connectivity of solutions found by stochastic gradient descent, even in settings where the previous requirements do not hold.
Quynh Nguyen 0001, Pierre Bréchet, Marco Mondelli
NeurIPS2