Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Casey Meehan
dblp:255/5544
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 87% Security and privacy of machine learning · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022 Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
memorization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
anonymization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › randomization
shuffling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation
image representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
document embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reconstruction attack · 1.3membership inference · 1.3robust statistics · 1.1language modeling · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD
Anvith Thudi, Hengrui Jia 0001, Casey Meehan, Ilia Shumailov, Nicolas Papernot |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2023 | Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised LearningabstractSelf-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms can produce useful image representations by learning to associate different parts of natural images with one another. However, when taken to the extreme, SSL models can unintendedly memorize specific parts in individual training samples rather than learning semantically meaningful associations. In this work, we perform a systematic study of the unintended memorization of image-specific information in SSL models -- which we refer to as déjà vu memorization. Concretely, we show that given the trained model and a crop of a training image containing only the background (e.g., water, sky, grass), it is possible to infer the foreground object with high accuracy or even visually reconstruct it. Furthermore, we show that déjà vu memorization is common to different SSL algorithms, is exacerbated by certain design choices, and cannot be detected by conventional techniques for evaluating representation quality. Our study of déjà vu memorization reveals previously unknown privacy risks in SSL models, as well as suggests potential practical mitigation strategies. Casey Meehan, Florian Bordes, Pascal Vincent, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Chuan Guo 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Sentence-level Privacy for Document EmbeddingsabstractUser language data can contain highly sensitive personal content.As such, it is imperative to offer users a strong and interpretable privacy guarantee when learning from their data.In this work, we propose SentDP: pure local differential privacy at the sentence level for a single user document.We propose a novel technique, DeepCandidate, that combines concepts from robust statistics and language modeling to produce high-dimensional, general-purpose ϵ-SentDP document embeddings.This guarantees that any single sentence in a document can be substituted with any other sentence while keeping the embedding ϵ-indistinguishable.Our experiments indicate that these private document embeddings are useful for downstream tasks like sentiment analysis and topic classification and even outperform baseline methods with weaker guarantees like word-level Metric DP. Casey Meehan, Khalil Mrini, Kamalika Chaudhuri |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | Privacy Amplification by Subsampling in Time DomainabstractAggregate time-series data like traffic flow and site occupancy repeatedly sample statistics from a population across time. Such data can be profoundly useful for understanding trends within a given population, but also pose a significant privacy risk, potentially revealing e.g., who spends time where. Producing a private version of a time-series satisfying the standard definition of Differential Privacy (DP) is challenging due to the large influence a single participant can have on the sequence: if an individual can contribute to each time step, the amount of additive noise needed to satisfy privacy increases linearly with the number of time steps sampled. As such, if a signal spans a long duration or is oversampled, an excessive amount of noise must be added, drowning out underlying trends. However, in many applications an individual realistically cannot participate at every time step. When this is the case, we observe that the influence of a single participant (sensitivity) can be reduced by subsampling and/or filtering in time, while still meeting privacy requirements. Using a novel analysis, we show this significant reduction in sensitivity and propose a corresponding class of privacy mechanisms. We demonstrate the utility benefits of these techniques empirically with real-world and synthetic time-series data. Tatsuki Koga, Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2022 | Privacy Implications of Shuffling
Casey Meehan, Amrita Roy Chowdhury 0001, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Somesh Jha |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Location Trace Privacy Under Conditional PriorsabstractProviding meaningful privacy to users of location based services is particularly challenging when multiple locations are revealed in a short period of time. This is primarily due to the tremendous degree of dependence that can be anticipated between points. We propose a Rényi divergence based privacy framework for bounding expected privacy loss for conditionally dependent data. Additionally, we demonstrate an algorithm for achieving this privacy under Gaussian process conditional priors. This framework both exemplifies why conditionally dependent data is so challenging to protect and offers a strategy for preserving privacy to within a fixed radius for sensitive locations in a user’s trace. Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Three Sample Hypothesis Test for Evaluating Generative ModelsabstractDetecting overfitting in generative models is an important challenge in machine learning. In this work, we formalize a form of overfitting that we call {\em{data-copying}} – where the generative model memorizes and outputs training samples or small variations thereof. We provide a three sample test for detecting data-copying that uses the training set, a separate sample from the target distribution, and a generated sample from the model, and study the performance of our test on several canonical models and datasets. Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
AISTATS | 1 |