Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Casey Meehan

dblp:255/5544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Privacy and data protection · 87% Security and privacy of machine learning · 13%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.932024
Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022
Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD
0.812024
Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
memorization
0.712023
Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Privacy and data protection
anonymization
0.612022
Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.612022
Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022
Privacy and data protection › randomization
shuffling
0.612022
Privacy Implications of Shuffling · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation
image representation
0.212023
Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
document embedding
0.212022
Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings · ACL (1) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reconstruction attack · 1.3membership inference · 1.3robust statistics · 1.1language modeling · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD
Anvith Thudi, Hengrui Jia 0001, Casey Meehan, Ilia Shumailov, Nicolas Papernot
USENIX Security Symposium3
2023 Do SSL Models Have Déjà Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning
abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms can produce useful image representations by learning to associate different parts of natural images with one another. However, when taken to the extreme, SSL models can unintendedly memorize specific parts in individual training samples rather than learning semantically meaningful associations. In this work, we perform a systematic study of the unintended memorization of image-specific information in SSL models -- which we refer to as déjà vu memorization. Concretely, we show that given the trained model and a crop of a training image containing only the background (e.g., water, sky, grass), it is possible to infer the foreground object with high accuracy or even visually reconstruct it. Furthermore, we show that déjà vu memorization is common to different SSL algorithms, is exacerbated by certain design choices, and cannot be detected by conventional techniques for evaluating representation quality. Our study of déjà vu memorization reveals previously unknown privacy risks in SSL models, as well as suggests potential practical mitigation strategies.
Casey Meehan, Florian Bordes, Pascal Vincent, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Chuan Guo 0001
NeurIPS1
2022 Sentence-level Privacy for Document Embeddings
abstract
User language data can contain highly sensitive personal content.As such, it is imperative to offer users a strong and interpretable privacy guarantee when learning from their data.In this work, we propose SentDP: pure local differential privacy at the sentence level for a single user document.We propose a novel technique, DeepCandidate, that combines concepts from robust statistics and language modeling to produce high-dimensional, general-purpose ϵ-SentDP document embeddings.This guarantees that any single sentence in a document can be substituted with any other sentence while keeping the embedding ϵ-indistinguishable.Our experiments indicate that these private document embeddings are useful for downstream tasks like sentiment analysis and topic classification and even outperform baseline methods with weaker guarantees like word-level Metric DP.
Casey Meehan, Khalil Mrini, Kamalika Chaudhuri
ACL (1)1
2022 Privacy Amplification by Subsampling in Time Domain
abstract
Aggregate time-series data like traffic flow and site occupancy repeatedly sample statistics from a population across time. Such data can be profoundly useful for understanding trends within a given population, but also pose a significant privacy risk, potentially revealing e.g., who spends time where. Producing a private version of a time-series satisfying the standard definition of Differential Privacy (DP) is challenging due to the large influence a single participant can have on the sequence: if an individual can contribute to each time step, the amount of additive noise needed to satisfy privacy increases linearly with the number of time steps sampled. As such, if a signal spans a long duration or is oversampled, an excessive amount of noise must be added, drowning out underlying trends. However, in many applications an individual realistically cannot participate at every time step. When this is the case, we observe that the influence of a single participant (sensitivity) can be reduced by subsampling and/or filtering in time, while still meeting privacy requirements. Using a novel analysis, we show this significant reduction in sensitivity and propose a corresponding class of privacy mechanisms. We demonstrate the utility benefits of these techniques empirically with real-world and synthetic time-series data.
Tatsuki Koga, Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri
AISTATS2
2022 Privacy Implications of Shuffling
Casey Meehan, Amrita Roy Chowdhury 0001, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Somesh Jha
ICLR1
2021 Location Trace Privacy Under Conditional Priors
abstract
Providing meaningful privacy to users of location based services is particularly challenging when multiple locations are revealed in a short period of time. This is primarily due to the tremendous degree of dependence that can be anticipated between points. We propose a Rényi divergence based privacy framework for bounding expected privacy loss for conditionally dependent data. Additionally, we demonstrate an algorithm for achieving this privacy under Gaussian process conditional priors. This framework both exemplifies why conditionally dependent data is so challenging to protect and offers a strategy for preserving privacy to within a fixed radius for sensitive locations in a user’s trace.
Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri
AISTATS1
2020 A Three Sample Hypothesis Test for Evaluating Generative Models
abstract
Detecting overfitting in generative models is an important challenge in machine learning. In this work, we formalize a form of overfitting that we call {\em{data-copying}} – where the generative model memorizes and outputs training samples or small variations thereof. We provide a three sample test for detecting data-copying that uses the training set, a separate sample from the target distribution, and a generated sample from the model, and study the performance of our test on several canonical models and datasets.
Casey Meehan, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Sanjoy Dasgupta
AISTATS1