Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Beluch
dblp:255/5959 · also William H. Beluch
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Generative modeling · 26% Language models and text generation · 13% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VSTAR: Generative Temporal Nursing for Longer Dynamic Video Synthesis · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VSTAR: Generative Temporal Nursing for Longer Dynamic Video Synthesis · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › video generation
text-to-video synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VSTAR: Generative Temporal Nursing for Longer Dynamic Video Synthesis · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
multi-class calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
shortcut learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
ensemble-based active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 2 | 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities · ICCV 2021 The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
prediction calibration |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal attention regularization · 0.9LLM-based prompt generation · 0.9mutual information maximization · 0.5metrics · 0.5diagnostic benchmark · 0.5binning · 0.5monte carlo dropout · 0.3ensemble · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VSTAR: Generative Temporal Nursing for Longer Dynamic Video SynthesisabstractDespite tremendous progress in the field of text-to-video (T2V) synthesis, open-sourced T2V diffusion models struggle to generate longer videos with dynamically varying and evolving content. They tend to synthesize quasi-static videos, ignoring the necessary visual change-over-time implied in the text prompt. Meanwhile, scaling these models to enable longer, more dynamic video synthesis often remains computationally intractable. To tackle this challenge, we introduce the concept of Generative Temporal Nursing (GTN), where we adjust the generative process on the fly during inference to improve control over the temporal dynamics and enable generation of longer videos. We propose a method for GTN, dubbed VSTAR, which consists of two key ingredients: Video Synopsis Prompting (VSP) and Temporal Attention Regularization (TAR), the latter being our core contribution. Based on a systematic analysis, we discover that the temporal units in pretrained T2V models are crucial to control the video dynamics. Upon this finding, we propose a novel regularization technique to refine the temporal attention, enabling training-free longer video synthesis in a single inference pass. For prompts involving visual progression, we leverage LLMs to generate video synopsis - description of key visual states - based on the original prompt to provide better guidance along the temporal axis. We experimentally showcase the superiority of our method in synthesizing longer, visually appealing videos over open-sourced T2V models. William Beluch, Margret Keuper, Dan Zhang 0003, Anna Khoreva |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | A Survey of Methods for Addressing Class Imbalance in Deep-Learning Based Natural Language ProcessingabstractMany natural language processing (NLP) tasks are naturally imbalanced, as some target categories occur much more frequently than others in the real world.In such scenarios, current NLP models tend to perform poorly on less frequent classes.Addressing class imbalance in NLP is an active research topic, yet, finding a good approach for a particular task and imbalance scenario is difficult.In this survey, the first overview on class imbalance in deep-learning based NLP, we first discuss various types of controlled and realworld class imbalance.Our survey then covers approaches that have been explicitly proposed for class-imbalanced NLP tasks or, originating in the computer vision community, have been evaluated on them.We organize the methods by whether they are based on sampling, data augmentation, choice of loss function, staged learning, or model design.Finally, we discuss open problems and how to move forward. Sophie Henning, William Beluch, Alexander Fraser 0001, Annemarie Friedrich |
EACL | 2 |
| 2021 | DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization OpportunitiesabstractCommon deep neural networks (DNNs) for image classification have been shown to rely on shortcut opportunities (SO) in the form of predictive and easy-to-represent visual factors. This is known as shortcut learning and leads to impaired generalization. In this work, we show that common DNNs also suffer from shortcut learning when predicting only basic visual object factors of variation (FoV) such as shape, color, or texture. We argue that besides shortcut opportunities, generalization opportunities (GO) are also an inherent part of real-world vision data and arise from partial independence between predicted classes and FoVs. We also argue that it is necessary for DNNs to exploit GO to overcome shortcut learning. Our core contribution is to introduce the Diagnostic Vision Benchmark suite DiagViB-6, which includes datasets and metrics to study a network’s shortcut vulnerability and generalization capability for six independent FoV. In particular, DiagViB-6 allows controlling the type and degree of SO and GO in a dataset. We benchmark a wide range of popular vision architectures and show that they can exploit GO only to a limited extent. Elias Eulig, Piyapat Saranrittichai, Chaithanya Kumar Mummadi, Kilian Rambach, William Beluch, Xiahan Shi, Volker Fischer 0003 |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2021 | Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binning
Kanil Patel, William Beluch, Bin Yang 0009, Michael Pfeiffer 0001, Dan Zhang 0003 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | On-manifold Adversarial Data Augmentation Improves Uncertainty CalibrationabstractUncertainty estimates help to identify ambiguous, novel, or anomalous inputs, but the reliable quantification of uncertainty has proven to be challenging for modern deep networks. To improve uncertainty estimation, we propose On-Manifold Adversarial Data Augmentation or OMADA, which specifically attempts to generate challenging examples by following an on-manifold adversarial attack path in the latent space of an autoencoder that closely approximates the decision boundaries between classes. On a variety of datasets and for multiple network architectures, OMADA consistently yields more accurate and better calibrated classifiers than baseline models, and outperforms competing approaches such as Mixup, as well as achieving similar performance to (at times better than) postprocessing calibration methods such as temperature scaling. Variants of OMADA can employ different sampling schemes for ambiguous on-manifold examples based on the entropy of their estimated soft labels, which exhibit specific strengths for generalization, calibration of predicted uncertainty, or detection of out-of-distribution inputs. Kanil Patel, William Beluch, Dan Zhang 0003, Michael Pfeiffer 0001, Bin Yang 0009 |
ICPR | 2 |
| 2018 | The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image ClassificationabstractDeep learning methods have become the de-facto standard for challenging image processing tasks such as image classification. One major hurdle of deep learning approaches is that large sets of labeled data are necessary, which can be prohibitively costly to obtain, particularly in medical image diagnosis applications. Active learning techniques can alleviate this labeling effort. In this paper we investigate some recently proposed methods for active learning with high-dimensional data and convolutional neural network classifiers. We compare ensemble-based methods against Monte-Carlo Dropout and geometric approaches. We find that ensembles perform better and lead to more calibrated predictive uncertainties, which are the basis for many active learning algorithms. To investigate why Monte-Carlo Dropout uncertainties perform worse, we explore potential differences in isolation in a series of experiments. We show results for MNIST and CIFAR-10, on which we achieve a test set accuracy of 90% with roughly 12,200 labeled images, and initial results on ImageNet. Additionally, we show results on a large, highly class-imbalanced diabetic retinopathy dataset. We observe that the ensemble-based active learning effectively counteracts this imbalance during acquisition. William Beluch, Tim Genewein, Andreas Nürnberger, Jan M. Köhler |
CVPR | 1 |