Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanson Wang
dblp:255/6040
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8554-8248ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning platform |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022 |
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
causal inference · 0.6black-box HTE explanation · 0.6bayesian optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Personalization for web-based services using offline reinforcement learning
Pavlos Athanasios Apostolopoulos, Hanson Wang, Tenghyu Xu, Chad Zhou, Kittipat Virochsiri, Norm Zhou, Igor L. Markov |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2022 | Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product DecisionsabstractModern software systems and products increasingly rely on machine learning models to make data-driven decisions based on interactions with users, infrastructure and other systems. For broader adoption, this practice must (i) accommodate product engineers without ML backgrounds, (ii) support finegrain product-metric evaluation and (iii) optimize for product goals. To address shortcomings of prior platforms, we introduce general principles for and the architecture of an ML platform, Looper, with simple APIs for decision-making and feedback collection. Looper covers the end-to-end ML lifecycle from collecting training data and model training to deployment and inference, and extends support to personalization, causal evaluation with heterogenous treatment effects, and Bayesian tuning for product goals. During the 2021 production deployment, Looper simultaneously hosted 440-1,000 ML models that made 4-6 million real-time decisions per second. We sum up experiences of platform adopters and describe their learning curve. Igor L. Markov, Hanson Wang, Nitya Kasturi, Shaun Singh, Mia Garrard, Sze Wai Yuen, Sarah Tran, Igor Glotov, Tanvi Gupta, Boshuang Huang, Xiaowen Xie, Michael Belkin, Sal Uryasev, Sam Howie, Eytan Bakshy, Norm Zhou |
KDD | 2 |
| 2022 | Interpretable Personalized ExperimentationabstractBlack-box heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) models are increasingly being used to create personalized policies that assign individuals to their optimal treatments. However, they are difficult to understand, and can be burdensome to maintain in a production environment. In this paper, we present a scalable, interpretable personalized experimentation system, implemented and deployed in production at Meta. The system works in a multiple treatment, multiple outcome setting typical at Meta to: (1) learn explanations for black-box HTE models; (2) generate interpretable personalized policies. We evaluate the methods used in the system on publicly available data and Meta use cases, and discuss lessons learnt during the development of the system. Sarah Tan, Weiwei Li 0006, Mia Garrard, Adam Obeng, Drew Dimmery, Shaun Singh, Hanson Wang, Daniel R. Jiang, Eytan Bakshy |
KDD | 8 |