Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jincheng Sun
dblp:255/6082
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 87% Storage systems · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-Blocking Raft for High Throughput IoT Data · ICDE 2023 |
Distributed systems › consensus › leader-based consensus
raft |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-Blocking Raft for High Throughput IoT Data · ICDE 2023 |
Storage systems › data management
time series database |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Non-Blocking Raft for High Throughput IoT Data · ICDE 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pipelining · 0.7parallel request processing · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | HDFN: Hierarchical Deformable Fusion with Dual-Latency Adaptation for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Detection
Guorui Zhao, Wuyang Luan, Jincheng Sun |
PRCV (11) | 3 |
| 2023 | Non-Blocking Raft for High Throughput IoT DataabstractThe Raft consensus protocol naturally fits time series databases, owing to the resemblance between its continuous log and the time series data. While the serialization of appending entries reduces the state space for ease design and implementation, it blocks the subsequent requests and thus limits the parallelism and throughput of Raft. Intuitively, once an entry arrives the follower, we may notice the leader and the client to unblock the subsequent as early, rather than waiting for its appending and committing. In this way, more requests can be processed in parallel, and thus the throughput increases, essential for IoT applications often with vast sensors and fast data ingestion. Of course, with higher parallelism, the risk of persistence for in-processing entries increases. It is a worthwhile trade-off in the IoT scenario since tiny data loss during leader failure is more acceptable than shutting out most data due to a low throughput. Our Non-Blocking Raft (NB-Raft) is implemented as the consensus protocol of Apache IoTDB, a commodity time series database management system, supporting various applications in Alibaba Cloud. Extensive evaluation shows that the throughput is improved by about 30% using our NB-Raft compared to the original Raft, a considerable amount of further data saved. Xiangdong Huang 0001, Shaoxu Song, Chen Wang 0018, Jianmin Wang 0001, Ruibo Li, Jincheng Sun |
ICDE | 7 |
| 2021 | The Analysis of Time Series Forecasting on Resource Provision of Cloud-based Game ServersabstractThe server workloads of large-scale online video games are elastic and on-demand. The workload can range from tens to thousands of server instances in short periods. In fact, a cloud-based video game ecosystem can reach a workload of millions of players every week. Given such a large scale, even a small portion of over-provisioning leads to a significant amount of resource idling and a high cost of waste. It is essential to define an effective forecasting model on the game session workloads given a time span. The effectiveness shall be measured by metrics representing Service Level Objectives (SLOs). In this work, we analyze time series forecasting models using ARIMA, Prophet, and LSTM to predict the number of virtual machines in need of cloud resource monitoring data. In addition, we define service-level metrics for measuring effectiveness based on factors of over/under provision and ratio of resource waste. We analyze models with 16 fleets with an average of 2754 game servers over a four-month-long period of time in the production environment. We observe that our LSTM model is the most accurate in forecasting the demand of virtual machines in terms of RMSE and MAE. Further analysis using metrics of SLOs, we observe that the LSTM model leads to more cases of under-provisioning than ARIMA and Prophet do. The LSTM model forecasts the demand of virtual machines with less over-provision ratio than ARIMA and Prophet do for 14 out of 16 fleets. Using the LSTM model, we further evaluate the forecasting effect across different time spans of a single fleet and across multiple fleets within the same time span. Esma Mouine, Yan Liu 0001, Jincheng Sun, Mathieu Nayrolles, Mahzad Kalantari |
IEEE BigData | 3 |