Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alon Reshef

dblp:255/6475 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database theory · 75% Data models and query languages · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database theory
conjunctive query
0.412020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
Data models and query languages › logic programming
negation
0.412020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
Database theory
query complexity
0.412020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
Database theory
shapley value computation
0.412020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
cooperative game theory
0.112020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value
0.112020
The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries · PODS 2020
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries
abstract
The Shapley value is a conventional and well-studied function for determining the contribution of a player to the coalition in a cooperative game. Among its applications in a plethora of domains, it has recently been proposed to use the Shapley value for quantifying the contribution of a tuple to the result of a database query. In particular, we have a thorough understanding of the tractability frontier for the class of Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and aggregate functions over CQs. It has also been established that a tractable (randomized) multiplicative approximation exists for every union of CQs. Nevertheless, all of these results are based on the monotonicity of CQs. In this work, we investigate the implication of negation on the complexity of Shapley computation, in both the exact and approximate senses. We generalize a known dichotomy to account for negated atoms. We also show that negation fundamentally changes the complexity of approximation. We do so by drawing a connection to the problem of deciding whether a tuple is "relevant" to a query, and by analyzing its complexity.
Alon Reshef, Benny Kimelfeld, Ester Livshits
PODS1