Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aria Y. Wang

dblp:255/6964 · also Aria Yuan Wang · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 62% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
convolutional neural network features
0.112019
Neural Taskonomy: Inferring the Similarity of Task-Derived Representations from Brain Activity · NeurIPS 2019
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.112019
Neural Taskonomy: Inferring the Similarity of Task-Derived Representations from Brain Activity · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 0.4representational similarity · 0.4encoding models · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Neural Taskonomy: Inferring the Similarity of Task-Derived Representations from Brain Activity
abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained for object classification have been widely used to account for visually-driven neural responses in both human and primate brains. However, because of the generality and complexity of object classification, despite the effectiveness of CNNs in predicting brain activity, it is difficult to draw specific inferences about neural information processing using CNN-derived representations. To address this problem, we used learned representations drawn from 21 computer vision tasks to construct encoding models for predicting brain responses from BOLD5000---a large-scale dataset comprised of fMRI scans collected while observers viewed over 5000 naturalistic scene and object images. Encoding models based on task features predict activity in different regions across the whole brain. Features from 3D tasks such as keypoint/edge detection explain greater variance compared to 2D tasks---a pattern observed across the whole brain. Using results across all 21 task representations, we constructed a ``task graph’’ based on the spatial layout of well-predicted brain areas from each task. A comparison of this brain-derived task structure to the task structure derived from transfer learning accuracy demonstrate that tasks with higher transferability make similar predictions for brain responses from different regions. These results---arising out of state-of-the-art computer vision methods---help reveal the task-specific architecture of the human visual system.
Aria Y. Wang, Michael J. Tarr, Leila Wehbe
NeurIPS1