Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Tao
dblp:255/7062
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Image recognition and object detection · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › example-based explanation › prototype-based explanation
prototypical part network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototype learning · 0.4deep network architecture · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image RecognitionabstractWhen we are faced with challenging image classification tasks, we often explain our reasoning by dissecting the image, and pointing out prototypical aspects of one class or another. The mounting evidence for each of the classes helps us make our final decision. In this work, we introduce a deep network architecture -- prototypical part network (ProtoPNet), that reasons in a similar way: the network dissects the image by finding prototypical parts, and combines evidence from the prototypes to make a final classification. The model thus reasons in a way that is qualitatively similar to the way ornithologists, physicians, and others would explain to people on how to solve challenging image classification tasks. The network uses only image-level labels for training without any annotations for parts of images. We demonstrate our method on the CUB-200-2011 dataset and the Stanford Cars dataset. Our experiments show that ProtoPNet can achieve comparable accuracy with its analogous non-interpretable counterpart, and when several ProtoPNets are combined into a larger network, it can achieve an accuracy that is on par with some of the best-performing deep models. Moreover, ProtoPNet provides a level of interpretability that is absent in other interpretable deep models. Oscar Li, Daniel Tao, Alina Barnett, Cynthia Rudin, Jonathan Su |
NeurIPS | 3 |