Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Suh
dblp:255/9377
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint
cardinality constraint |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with Cardinality Constraints · ICALP 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with Cardinality Constraints · ICALP 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with Cardinality Constraints · ICALP 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with Cardinality Constraints · ICALP 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multilinear extension · 0.4combinatorial algorithms · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with Cardinality ConstraintsabstractWe study the problem of maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a cardinality constraint in the streaming model. Our main contributions are two single-pass (semi-)streaming algorithms that use Õ(k)⋅poly(1/ε) memory, where k is the size constraint. At the end of the stream, both our algorithms post-process their data structures using any offline algorithm for submodular maximization, and obtain a solution whose approximation guarantee is α/(1+α)-ε, where α is the approximation of the offline algorithm. If we use an exact (exponential time) post-processing algorithm, this leads to 1/2-ε approximation (which is nearly optimal). If we post-process with the algorithm of [Niv Buchbinder and Moran Feldman, 2019], that achieves the state-of-the-art offline approximation guarantee of α = 0.385, we obtain 0.2779-approximation in polynomial time, improving over the previously best polynomial-time approximation of 0.1715 due to [Feldman et al., 2018]. One of our algorithms is combinatorial and enjoys fast update and overall running times. Our other algorithm is based on the multilinear extension, enjoys an improved space complexity, and can be made deterministic in some settings of interest. Naor Alaluf, Alina Ene, Moran Feldman, Huy L. Nguyen 0001, Andrew Suh |
ICALP | 5 |