Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liangjun Su

dblp:256/0506 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-0565-6928ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 59% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 41%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 54% Information theory · 46%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph clustering
1.122022
Detecting Latent Communities in Network Formation Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Determining the Number of Communities in Degree-corrected Stochastic Block Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
statistical network models
1.122022
Detecting Latent Communities in Network Formation Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Determining the Number of Communities in Degree-corrected Stochastic Block Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model
0.512021
Determining the Number of Communities in Degree-corrected Stochastic Block Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Data mining
clustering
0.412020
Strong Consistency of Spectral Clustering for Stochastic Block Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection
0.412020
Strong Consistency of Spectral Clustering for Stochastic Block Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.412020
Strong Consistency of Spectral Clustering for Stochastic Block Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
stochastic block model
0.412020
Strong Consistency of Spectral Clustering for Stochastic Block Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
nuclear norm minimization
0.212022
Detecting Latent Communities in Network Formation Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test
0.112021
Determining the Number of Communities in Degree-corrected Stochastic Block Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral clustering · 2.6nuclear norm regularization · 1.1iterative logistic regression · 1.1pseudo likelihood ratio · 1.0binary segmentation · 1.0k-means · 0.4graph laplacian · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Detecting Latent Communities in Network Formation Models
abstract
This paper proposes a logistic undirected network formation model which allows for assortative matching on observed individual characteristics and the presence of edge-wise fixed effects. We model the coefficients of observed characteristics to have a latent community structure and the edge-wise fixed effects to be of low rank. We propose a multi-step estimation procedure involving nuclear norm regularization, sample splitting, iterative logistic regression and spectral clustering to detect the latent communities. We show that the latent communities can be exactly recovered when the expected degree of the network is of order logn or higher, where n is the number of nodes in the network. The finite sample performance of the new estimation and inference methods is illustrated through both simulated and real datasets.
Shujie Ma, Liangjun Su, Yichong Zhang
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2021 Determining the Number of Communities in Degree-corrected Stochastic Block Models
abstract
We propose to estimate the number of communities in degree-corrected stochastic block models based on a pseudo likelihood ratio statistic. To this end, we introduce a method that combines spectral clustering with binary segmentation. This approach guarantees an upper bound for the pseudo likelihood ratio statistic when the model is over-fitted. We also derive its limiting distribution when the model is under-fitted. Based on these properties, we establish the consistency of our estimator for the true number of communities. Developing these theoretical properties require a mild condition on the average degrees - growing at a rate no slower than log(n), where n is the number of nodes. Our proposed method is further illustrated by simulation studies and analysis of real-world networks. The numerical results show that our approach has satisfactory performance when the network is semi-dense.
Shujie Ma, Liangjun Su, Yichong Zhang
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Strong Consistency of Spectral Clustering for Stochastic Block Models
abstract
In this paper we prove the strong consistency of several methods based on the spectral clustering techniques that are widely used to study the community detection problem in stochastic block models (SBMs). We show that under some weak conditions on the minimal degree, the number of communities, and the eigenvalues of the probability block matrix, the K-means algorithm applied to the eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian associated with its first few largest eigenvalues can classify all individuals into the true community uniformly correctly almost surely. Extensions to both regularized spectral clustering and degree-corrected SBMs are also considered. We illustrate the performance of different methods on simulated networks.
Liangjun Su, Wuyi Wang, Yichong Zhang
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1