Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Michael Tingley

dblp:256/5314 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8024-5777ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Web and social media mining · 63% Data mining · 37%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining › malicious behavior detection
fake account detection
0.712023
Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023
Web and social media mining
preferential attachment
0.712023
Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.712023
Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.612022
Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical bayesian model
0.612022
Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022
Data mining
crowdsourcing
0.612022
Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022
Data mining › crowdsourcing
label aggregation
0.612022
Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical nonparametric bayesian model · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1preferential attachment classifiers · 0.7multiclass classification · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers
abstract
In this paper, we describe a new algorithm called Preferential Attac hment k-class Classifier (PreAttacK) for detecting fake accounts in a social network. Recently, several algorithms have obtained high accuracy on this problem. However, they have done so by relying on information about fake accounts' friendships or the content they share with others-the very things we seek to prevent.
Adam Breuer, Nazanin Khosravani Tehrani, Michael Tingley, Bradford Cottel
KDD3
2022 Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty
abstract
We study a crowdsourcing setting where we need to infer the latent truth about a task given observed labels together with context in the form of a classifier score. We present Theodon, a hierarchical non-parametric Bayesian model, developed and deployed at Meta, that captures both the prevalence of label categories and the accuracy of labelers as functions of the classifier score. Theodon uses Gaussian processes to model the non-uniformity of mistakes over the range of classifier scores. For our experiments, we used data generated from integrity applications at Meta as well as public datasets. We showed that Theodon (1) obtains 1-4% improvement in AUC-PR predictions on items' true labels compared to state-of-the-art baselines for public datasets, (2) is effective as a calibration method, and (3) provides detailed insights on labelers' performances.
Viet-An Nguyen, Peibei Shi, Jagdish Ramakrishnan, Narjes Torabi, Nimar S. Arora, Udi Weinsberg, Michael Tingley
KDD7
2021 Accelerating Metropolis-Hastings with Lightweight Inference Compilation
abstract
In order to construct accurate proposers for Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we integrate ideas from probabilistic graphical models and neural networks in an open-source framework we call Lightweight Inference Compilation (LIC). LIC implements amortized inference within an open-universe declarative probabilistic programming language (PPL). Graph neural networks are used to parameterize proposal distributions as functions of Markov blankets, which during “compilation” are optimized to approximate single-site Gibbs sampling distributions. Unlike prior work in inference compilation (IC), LIC forgoes importance sampling of linear execution traces in favor of operating directly on Bayesian networks. Through using a declarative PPL, the Markov blankets of nodes (which may be non-static) are queried at inference-time to produce proposers Experimental results show LIC can produce proposers which have less parameters, greater robustness to nuisance random variables, and improved posterior sampling in a Bayesian logistic regression and n-schools inference application.
Feynman T. Liang, Nimar S. Arora, Nazanin Khosravani Tehrani, Yucen Lily Li, Michael Tingley, Erik Meijer 0001
AISTATS5