EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Tingley
dblp:256/5314
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8024-5777ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Web and social media mining · 63% Data mining · 37% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining › malicious behavior detection
fake account detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023 |
Web and social media mining
preferential attachment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment Classifiers · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical bayesian model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022 |
Data mining
crowdsourcing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022 |
Data mining › crowdsourcing
label aggregation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Crowdsourcing with Contextual Uncertainty · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical nonparametric bayesian model · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1preferential attachment classifiers · 0.7multiclass classification · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment ClassifiersabstractIn this paper, we describe a new algorithm called Preferential Attac hment k-class Classifier (PreAttacK) for detecting fake accounts in a social network. Recently, several algorithms have obtained high accuracy on this problem. However, they have done so by relying on information about fake accounts' friendships or the content they share with others-the very things we seek to prevent. Adam Breuer, Nazanin Khosravani Tehrani, Michael Tingley, Bradford Cottel |
KDD | 3 |
| 2022 | Crowdsourcing with Contextual UncertaintyabstractWe study a crowdsourcing setting where we need to infer the latent truth about a task given observed labels together with context in the form of a classifier score. We present Theodon, a hierarchical non-parametric Bayesian model, developed and deployed at Meta, that captures both the prevalence of label categories and the accuracy of labelers as functions of the classifier score. Theodon uses Gaussian processes to model the non-uniformity of mistakes over the range of classifier scores. For our experiments, we used data generated from integrity applications at Meta as well as public datasets. We showed that Theodon (1) obtains 1-4% improvement in AUC-PR predictions on items' true labels compared to state-of-the-art baselines for public datasets, (2) is effective as a calibration method, and (3) provides detailed insights on labelers' performances. Viet-An Nguyen, Peibei Shi, Jagdish Ramakrishnan, Narjes Torabi, Nimar S. Arora, Udi Weinsberg, Michael Tingley |
KDD | 7 |
| 2021 | Accelerating Metropolis-Hastings with Lightweight Inference CompilationabstractIn order to construct accurate proposers for Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we integrate ideas from probabilistic graphical models and neural networks in an open-source framework we call Lightweight Inference Compilation (LIC). LIC implements amortized inference within an open-universe declarative probabilistic programming language (PPL). Graph neural networks are used to parameterize proposal distributions as functions of Markov blankets, which during “compilation” are optimized to approximate single-site Gibbs sampling distributions. Unlike prior work in inference compilation (IC), LIC forgoes importance sampling of linear execution traces in favor of operating directly on Bayesian networks. Through using a declarative PPL, the Markov blankets of nodes (which may be non-static) are queried at inference-time to produce proposers Experimental results show LIC can produce proposers which have less parameters, greater robustness to nuisance random variables, and improved posterior sampling in a Bayesian logistic regression and n-schools inference application. Feynman T. Liang, Nimar S. Arora, Nazanin Khosravani Tehrani, Yucen Lily Li, Michael Tingley, Erik Meijer 0001 |
AISTATS | 5 |