Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Viet Duong
dblp:256/5468
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0488-8735ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICSE 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICSE 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code model
deep code models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICSE 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive Models · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › self-interpretable models
generalized additive model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive Models · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive Models · KDD 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software quality assurance |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICSE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised learning · 1.7weakly-supervised learning · 0.9weakly supervised learning · 0.9taylor expansion · 0.8polynomial regression · 0.8concept learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution DetectionabstractNumerous machine learning (ML) models have been developed, including those for software engineering (SE) tasks, under the assumption that training and testing data come from the same distribution. However, training and testing distributions often differ, as training datasets rarely encompass the entire distribution, while testing distribution tends to shift over time. Hence, when confronted with out-of-distribution (OOD) instances that differ from the training data, a reliable and trustworthy SE ML model must be capable of detecting them to either abstain from making predictions, or potentially forward these OODs to appropriate models handling other categories or tasks. In this paper, we develop two types of SE-specific OOD detection models, unsupervised and weakly-supervised OOD detection for code. The unsupervised OOD detection approach is trained solely on in-distribution samples while the weakly-supervised approach utilizes a tiny number of OOD samples to further enhance the detection performance in various OOD scenarios. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our proposed methods significantly outperform the baselines in detecting OOD samples from four different scenarios simultaneously and also positively impact a main code understanding task. Yanfu Yan, Viet Duong, Huajie Shao, Denys Poshyvanyk |
ICSE | 2 |
| 2024 | CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive ModelsabstractAs an emerging interpretable technique, Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) adopt neural networks to individually learn non-linear functions for each feature, which are then combined through a linear model for final predictions. Although GAMs can explain deep neural networks (DNNs) at the feature level, they require large numbers of model parameters and are prone to overfitting, making them hard to train and scale. Additionally, in real-world datasets with many features, the interpretability of feature-based explanations diminishes for humans. To tackle these issues, recent research has shifted towards concept-based interpretable methods. These approaches try to integrate concept learning as an intermediate step before making predictions, explaining the predictions in terms of human-understandable concepts. However, these methods require domain experts to extensively label concepts with relevant names and their ground-truth values. In response, we propose CAT, a novel interpretable Concept-bAsed Taylor additive model to simplify this process. CAT does not require domain experts to annotate concepts and their ground-truth values. Instead, it only requires users to simply categorize input features into broad groups, which can be easily accomplished through a quick metadata review. Specifically, CAT first embeds each group of input features into one-dimensional high-level concept representation, and then feeds the concept representations into a new white-box Taylor Neural Network (TaylorNet). The TaylorNet aims to learn the non-linear relationship between the inputs and outputs using polynomials. Evaluation results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that CAT can outperform or compete with the baselines while reducing the need of extensive model parameters. Importantly, it can effectively explain model predictions through high-level concepts. Source code is available at github.com/vduong143/CAT-KDD-2024. Viet Duong, Qiong Wu 0008, Zhengyi Zhou, Hongjue Zhao, Chenxiang Luo, Eric Zavesky, Huaxiu Yao, Huajie Shao |
KDD | 1 |
| 2020 | The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 PandemicabstractIn the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. Following the closure of the University of Washington on March 7th, more than 1000 colleges and universities in the United States have cancelled in-person classes and campus activities, impacting millions of students. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society regarding both the general public and higher education populations by mining people's opinions on social media. We discover several topics embedded in a large number of COVID-19 tweets that represent the most central issues related to the pandemic, which are of great concerns for both college students and the general public. Moreover, we find significant differences between these two groups of Twitter users with respect to the sentiments they expressed towards the COVID-19 issues. To our best knowledge, this is the first social media-based study which focuses on the college student community's demographics and responses to prevalent social issues during a major crisis. Viet Duong, Jiebo Luo 0001, Phu Pham, Yu Wang 0041 |
ASONAM | 1 |