Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anne von Vietinghoff

dblp:256/6146 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
search-based software testing
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019
Software testing
simulation-based testing
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019
Software testing
test generation
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications
abstract
Automated test generation and evaluation in simulation environments is a key technology for verification of automated driving (AD) applications. Search-based testing (SBT) is an approach for automated test generation that leverages optimization to efficiently generate interesting concrete tests from abstract test descriptions. In this experience paper, we report on our observations after successfully applying SBT to AD control applications in several use cases with different characteristics. Based on our experiences, we derive a number of lessons learned that we consider important for the adoption of SBT methods and tools in industrial settings. The key lesson is that SBT finds relevant errors and provides valuable feedback to the developers, but requires tool support for writing specifications.
Christoph Gladisch, Thomas Heinz 0001, Christian Heinzemann, Jens Oehlerking, Anne von Vietinghoff, Tim Pfitzer
ASE5