Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Caleb Belth
dblp:256/6224
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6256-3381ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 48% Knowledge graphs · 32% Graph data management · 21% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving Networks · KDD 2020 |
Data mining › pattern mining
frequent pattern mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving Networks · KDD 2020 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Hidden Challenge of Link Prediction: Which Pairs to Check? · ICDM 2020 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph quality
knowledge graph refinement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | What is Normal, What is Strange, and What is Missing in a Knowledge Graph: Unified Characterization via Inductive Summarization · WWW 2020 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Hidden Challenge of Link Prediction: Which Pairs to Check? · ICDM 2020 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving Networks · KDD 2020 |
Graph data management › temporal graph mining
temporal motif mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving Networks · KDD 2020 |
Graph data management
graph summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Personalized Knowledge Graph Summarization: From the Cloud to Your Pocket · ICDM 2019 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph querying |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Personalized Knowledge Graph Summarization: From the Cloud to Your Pocket · ICDM 2019 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
stochastic block model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Hidden Challenge of Link Prediction: Which Pairs to Check? · ICDM 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inductive summarization · 0.9streaming algorithms · 0.4stochastic block model · 0.4persistence measure · 0.4node embedding · 0.4locality-sensitive hashing · 0.4utility maximization · 0.4sparse graph construction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A hidden challenge of link prediction: which pairs to check?
Caleb Belth, Alican Büyükçakir, Danai Koutra |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2021 | The Greedy and Recursive Search for Morphological Productivity
Caleb Belth, Sarah R. B. Payne, Deniz Beser, Jordan Kodner, Charles Yang 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2020 | A Hidden Challenge of Link Prediction: Which Pairs to Check?abstractThe traditional setup of link prediction in networks assumes that a test set of node pairs, which is usually balanced, is available over which to predict the presence of links. However, in practice, there is no test set: the ground-truth is not known, so the number of possible pairs to predict over is quadratic in the number of nodes in the graph. Moreover, because graphs are sparse, most of these possible pairs will not be links. Thus, link prediction methods, which often rely on proximity-preserving embeddings or heuristic notions of node similarity, face a vast search space, with many pairs that are in close proximity, but that should not be linked. To mitigate this issue, we introduce LinkWaldo, a framework for choosing from this quadratic, massively-skewed search space of node pairs, a concise set of candidate pairs that, in addition to being in close proximity, also structurally resemble the observed edges. This allows it to ignore some high-proximity but low-resemblance pairs, and also identify high-resemblance, lower-proximity pairs. Our framework is built on a model that theoretically combines Stochastic Block Models (SBMs) with node proximity models. The block structure of the SBM maps out where in the search space new links are expected to fall, and the proximity identifies the most plausible links within these blocks, using locality sensitive hashing to avoid expensive exhaustive search. LinkWaldo can use any node representation learning or heuristic definition of proximity, and can generate candidate pairs for any link prediction method, allowing the representation power of current and future methods to be realized for link prediction in practice. We evaluate LinkWaldo on 13 networks across multiple domains, and show that on average it returns candidate sets containing 7-33% more missing and future links than both embedding-based and heuristic baselines' sets. Caleb Belth, Alican Büyükçakir, Danai Koutra |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2020 | Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving NetworksabstractFrequent pattern mining is a key area of study that gives insights into the structure and dynamics of evolving networks, such as social or road networks. However, not only does a network evolve, but often the way that it evolves, itself evolves. Thus, knowing, in addition to patterns' frequencies, for how long and how regularly they have occurred-i.e., their persistence-can add to our understanding of evolving networks. In this work, we propose the problem of mining activity that persists through time in continually evolving networks-i.e., activity that repeatedly and consistently occurs. We extend the notion of temporal motifs to capture activity among specific nodes, in what we call activity snippets, which are small sequences of edge-updates that reoccur. We propose axioms and properties that a measure of persistence should satisfy, and develop such a persistence measure. We also propose PENminer, an efficient framework for mining activity snippets' Persistence in Evolving Networks, and design both offline and streaming algorithms. We apply PENminer to numerous real, large-scale evolving networks and edge streams, and find activity that is surprisingly regular over a long period of time, but too infrequent to be discovered by aggregate count alone, and bursts of activity exposed by their lack of persistence. Our findings with PENminer include neighborhoods in NYC where taxi traffic persisted through Hurricane Sandy, the opening of new bike-stations, characteristics of social network users, and more. Moreover, we use PENminer towards identifying anomalies in multiple networks, outperforming baselines at identifying subtle anomalies by 9.8-48% in AUC. Caleb Belth, Danai Koutra |
KDD | 1 |
| 2020 | What is Normal, What is Strange, and What is Missing in a Knowledge Graph: Unified Characterization via Inductive SummarizationabstractKnowledge graphs (KGs) store highly heterogeneous information about the world in the structure of a graph, and are useful for tasks such as question answering and reasoning. However, they often contain errors and are missing information. Vibrant research in KG refinement has worked to resolve these issues, tailoring techniques to either detect specific types of errors or complete a KG. Caleb Belth, Jilles Vreeken, Danai Koutra |
WWW | 1 |
| 2019 | When to remember where you came from: node representation learning in higher-order networksabstractFor trajectory data that tend to have beyond first-order (i.e., non-Markovian) dependencies, higher-order networks have been shown to accurately capture details lost with the standard aggregate network representation. At the same time, representation learning has shown success on a wide range of network tasks, removing the need to hand-craft features for these tasks. In this work, we propose a node representation learning framework called EVO or Embedding Variable Orders, which captures non-Markovian dependencies by combining work on higher-order networks with work on node embeddings. We show that EVO outperforms baselines in tasks where high-order dependencies are likely to matter, demonstrating the benefits of considering high-order dependencies in node embeddings. We also provide insights into when it does or does not help to capture these dependencies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work on representation learning for higher-order networks. Caleb Belth, Fahad Kamran, Donna Tjandra, Danai Koutra |
ASONAM | 1 |
| 2019 | Personalized Knowledge Graph Summarization: From the Cloud to Your PocketabstractThe increasing scale of encyclopedic knowledge graphs (KGs) calls for summarization as a way to help users efficiently access and distill world knowledge. Motivated by the disparity between individuals' limited information needs and the massive scale of KGs, in this paper we propose a new problem called personalized knowledge graph summarization. The goal is to construct compact "personal summaries" of KGs containing only the facts most relevant to individuals' interests. Such summaries can be stored and utilized on-device, allowing individuals private, anytime access to the information that interests them most. We formalize the problem as one of constructing a sparse graph, or summary, that maximizes a user's inferred "utility" over a given KG, subject to a user-and device-specific constraint on the summary's size. To solve it, we propose GLIMPSE, a summarization framework that provides theoretical guarantees on the summary's utility and is linear in the number of edges in the KG. In an evaluation with real user queries to open-source, encyclopedic KGs of up to one billion triples, we show that GLIMPSE efficiently creates summaries that outperform strong baselines by up to 19% in query answering F1 score. Tara Safavi, Caleb Belth, Lukas Faber, Davide Mottin, Emmanuel Müller, Danai Koutra |
ICDM | 2 |