Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nickolai Riabov

dblp:256/9179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization
0.412020
ADMM SLIM: Sparse Recommendations for Many Users · WSDM 2020
Recommender systems
recommendation optimization
0.412020
ADMM SLIM: Sparse Recommendations for Many Users · WSDM 2020
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering › model-based collaborative filtering
sparse linear method
0.412020
ADMM SLIM: Sparse Recommendations for Many Users · WSDM 2020
Recommender systems › personalized ranking
top-n recommendation
0.412020
ADMM SLIM: Sparse Recommendations for Many Users · WSDM 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 0.4non-negativity constraints · 0.4alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 ADMM SLIM: Sparse Recommendations for Many Users
abstract
The Sparse Linear Method (SLIM) is a well-established approach for top-N recommendations. This article proposes several improvements that are enabled by the Alternating Directions Method of Multipliers (ADMM), a well-known optimization method with many application areas. First, we show that optimizing the original SLIM-objective by ADMM results in an approach where the training time is independent of the number of users in the training data, and hence trivially scales to large numbers of users. Second, the flexibility of ADMM allows us to switch on and off the various constraints and regularization terms in the original SLIM-objective, in order to empirically assess their contributions to ranking accuracy on given data. Third, we also propose two extensions to the original SLIM training-objective in order to improve recommendation accuracy further without increasing the computational cost. In our experiments on three well-known data-sets, we first compare to the original SLIM-implementation and find that not only ADMM reduces training time considerably, but also achieves an improvement in recommendation accuracy due to better optimization. We then compare to various state-of-the-art approaches and observe up to 25% improvement in recommendation accuracy in our experiments. Finally, we evaluate the importance of sparsity and the non-negativity constraint in the original SLIM-objective with sub-sampling experiments that simulate scenarios of cold-starting and large catalog sizes compared to relatively small user base, which often occur in practice.
Harald Steck, Maria Dimakopoulou, Nickolai Riabov, Tony Jebara
WSDM3