Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shyam A. Tailor
dblp:256/9384 · also Shyam Anil Tailor
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Vision and language · 17% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks? · ICLR 2022 Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
pruning at initialization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantization-aware training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
activity recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
anonymization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bellrock: Anonymous Proximity Beacons From Personal Devices · PerCom 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative modeling · 1.7meta-gradient · 0.6quantization-aware training · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scaling Wearable Foundation ModelsabstractWearable sensors have become ubiquitous thanks to a variety of health tracking features. The resulting continuous and longitudinal measurements from everyday life generate large volumes of data. However, making sense of these observations for scientific and actionable insights is non-trivial. Inspired by the empirical success of generative modeling, where large neural networks learn powerful representations from vast amounts of text, image, video, or audio data, we investigate the scaling properties of wearable sensor foundation models across compute, data, and model size. Using a dataset of up to 40 million hours of in-situ heart rate, heart rate variability, accelerometer, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and altimeter per-minute data from over 165,000 people, we create LSM, a multimodal foundation model built on the largest wearable-signals dataset with the most extensive range of sensor modalities to date. Our results establish the scaling laws of LSM for tasks such as imputation, interpolation and extrapolation across both time and sensor modalities. Moreover, we highlight how LSM enables sample-efficient downstream learning for tasks including exercise and activity recognition. Girish Narayanswamy, Xin Liu 0034, Kumar Ayush, Yuzhe Yang 0003, Xuhai Xu, Shun Liao, Jake Garrison, Shyam A. Tailor, Jacob E. Sunshine, Yun Liu 0013, Tim Althoff, Shri Narayanan, Pushmeet Kohli, Jiening Zhan, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak N. Patel, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Daniel McDuff |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients
Milad Alizadeh, Shyam A. Tailor, Luisa M. Zintgraf, Joost van Amersfoort, Sebastian Farquhar, Nicholas D. Lane, Yarin Gal |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks?
Shyam A. Tailor, Felix L. Opolka, Pietro Liò, Nicholas D. Lane |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks
Shyam A. Tailor, Javier Fernández-Marqués, Nicholas D. Lane |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2018 | Bellrock: Anonymous Proximity Beacons From Personal DevicesabstractProximity beacons provide simple, low-cost location data. However, beacon deployments remain rare. In this paper we introduce Bellrock, a framework that repurposes static personal devices (phones, laptops, etc.) as proximity beacons without revealing the location of the device owners, and provides conventional beacons with access control. This is done by using mutable pseudo-anonymous identifiers that can be unmasked by a cloud service.We develop Bellrock as a general framework, describing the repurposing scheme and the anonymisation techniques, before applying it to Bluetooth Low Energy beacons. We implement and demonstrate the scalability of the de-anonymisation server, which uses a series of heuristics. We implement a Bellrock client on Android and demonstrate negligible impact on battery lifetime. We evaluate Bellrock using extensive real-world office worker movements. We find that Bellrock was able to provide proximity locations for 8,542 of the 21,796 failed locations that would have occurred without it. We further find that office workers were in range of one or more of their co-workers over 90% of the time, indicating Bellrock can provide relative proximity information even in the absence of a conventional beacon deployment. Overall, we find that Bellrock is both feasible and practical, providing a beacon deployment where there was none, or supplementing existing deployments. Augustin Zídek, Shyam A. Tailor, Robert K. Harle |
PerCom | 2 |