Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shyam A. Tailor

dblp:256/9384 · also Shyam Anil Tailor · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Vision and language · 17%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23%
Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.122022
Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022
Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.912025
Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.722022
Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks? · ICLR 2022
Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
pruning at initialization
0.612022
Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantization-aware training
0.512021
Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
activity recognition
0.312025
Scaling Wearable Foundation Models · ICLR 2025
Privacy and data protection
anonymization
0.112018
Bellrock: Anonymous Proximity Beacons From Personal Devices · PerCom 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative modeling · 1.7meta-gradient · 0.6quantization-aware training · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scaling Wearable Foundation Models
abstract
Wearable sensors have become ubiquitous thanks to a variety of health tracking features. The resulting continuous and longitudinal measurements from everyday life generate large volumes of data. However, making sense of these observations for scientific and actionable insights is non-trivial. Inspired by the empirical success of generative modeling, where large neural networks learn powerful representations from vast amounts of text, image, video, or audio data, we investigate the scaling properties of wearable sensor foundation models across compute, data, and model size. Using a dataset of up to 40 million hours of in-situ heart rate, heart rate variability, accelerometer, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and altimeter per-minute data from over 165,000 people, we create LSM, a multimodal foundation model built on the largest wearable-signals dataset with the most extensive range of sensor modalities to date. Our results establish the scaling laws of LSM for tasks such as imputation, interpolation and extrapolation across both time and sensor modalities. Moreover, we highlight how LSM enables sample-efficient downstream learning for tasks including exercise and activity recognition.
Girish Narayanswamy, Xin Liu 0034, Kumar Ayush, Yuzhe Yang 0003, Xuhai Xu, Shun Liao, Jake Garrison, Shyam A. Tailor, Jacob E. Sunshine, Yun Liu 0013, Tim Althoff, Shri Narayanan, Pushmeet Kohli, Jiening Zhan, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak N. Patel, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Daniel McDuff
ICLR8
2022 Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients
Milad Alizadeh, Shyam A. Tailor, Luisa M. Zintgraf, Joost van Amersfoort, Sebastian Farquhar, Nicholas D. Lane, Yarin Gal
ICLR2
2022 Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks?
Shyam A. Tailor, Felix L. Opolka, Pietro Liò, Nicholas D. Lane
ICLR1
2021 Degree-Quant: Quantization-Aware Training for Graph Neural Networks
Shyam A. Tailor, Javier Fernández-Marqués, Nicholas D. Lane
ICLR1
2018 Bellrock: Anonymous Proximity Beacons From Personal Devices
abstract
Proximity beacons provide simple, low-cost location data. However, beacon deployments remain rare. In this paper we introduce Bellrock, a framework that repurposes static personal devices (phones, laptops, etc.) as proximity beacons without revealing the location of the device owners, and provides conventional beacons with access control. This is done by using mutable pseudo-anonymous identifiers that can be unmasked by a cloud service.We develop Bellrock as a general framework, describing the repurposing scheme and the anonymisation techniques, before applying it to Bluetooth Low Energy beacons. We implement and demonstrate the scalability of the de-anonymisation server, which uses a series of heuristics. We implement a Bellrock client on Android and demonstrate negligible impact on battery lifetime. We evaluate Bellrock using extensive real-world office worker movements. We find that Bellrock was able to provide proximity locations for 8,542 of the 21,796 failed locations that would have occurred without it. We further find that office workers were in range of one or more of their co-workers over 90% of the time, indicating Bellrock can provide relative proximity information even in the absence of a conventional beacon deployment. Overall, we find that Bellrock is both feasible and practical, providing a beacon deployment where there was none, or supplementing existing deployments.
Augustin Zídek, Shyam A. Tailor, Robert K. Harle
PerCom2