Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sotirios Nikas

dblp:256/9553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% Energy-efficient computing · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
execution time prediction
0.512021
A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU Kernels · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2021
Energy-efficient computing
power prediction
0.512021
A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU Kernels · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 0.5cross-validation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU Kernels
abstract
Characterizing compute kernel execution behavior on GPUs for efficient task scheduling is a non-trivial task. We address this with a simple model enabling portable and fast predictions among different GPUs using only hardware-independent features. This model is built based on random forests using 189 individual compute kernels from benchmarks such as Parboil, Rodinia, Polybench-GPU, and SHOC. Evaluation of the model performance using cross-validation yields a median Mean Average Percentage Error (MAPE) of 8.86–52.0% for time and 1.84–2.94% for power prediction across five different GPUs, while latency for a single prediction varies between 15 and 108 ms.
Lorenz Braun, Sotirios Nikas, Vincent Heuveline, Holger Fröning
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.2