Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sotirios Nikas
dblp:256/9553
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% Energy-efficient computing · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
execution time prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU Kernels · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2021 |
Energy-efficient computing
power prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU Kernels · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.5cross-validation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Simple Model for Portable and Fast Prediction of Execution Time and Power Consumption of GPU KernelsabstractCharacterizing compute kernel execution behavior on GPUs for efficient task scheduling is a non-trivial task. We address this with a simple model enabling portable and fast predictions among different GPUs using only hardware-independent features. This model is built based on random forests using 189 individual compute kernels from benchmarks such as Parboil, Rodinia, Polybench-GPU, and SHOC. Evaluation of the model performance using cross-validation yields a median Mean Average Percentage Error (MAPE) of 8.86–52.0% for time and 1.84–2.94% for power prediction across five different GPUs, while latency for a single prediction varies between 15 and 108 ms. Lorenz Braun, Sotirios Nikas, Vincent Heuveline, Holger Fröning |
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. | 2 |