Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dongshi Liu

dblp:257/1275 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-5443-0815ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › storage reliability
disk failure prediction
0.812024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024
Storage systems
flash and SSD
0.812024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024
Storage systems › flash and SSD › SSD reliability
SSD failure prediction
0.812024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.812024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.212024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024
Data mining
semi-supervised learning
0.212024
Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 1.5reconstruction · 1.5density estimation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Proactive Drive Failure Prediction for Cloud Storage System Through Semi-Supervised Learning
abstract
Proactive drive failure prediction can help operators handle the failing drives in advance, enhancing the storage system dependability. SSD and HDD failure prediction techniques are currently evolving towards a semi-supervised approach. In this paper, we are dedicated to enhancing the methodology for semi-supervised drive failure prediction from these aspects: design more powerful, robust yet generic models, mine drive failure modes and make the prediction model interpretable. Specifically, we propose two semi-supervised drive failure prediction models, DFP-VL and DFP-FL, from the perspective of reconstructing SMART data and learning SMART data's probability density, respectively. They capture the pattern of healthy drives, and failing drives can be detected when they deviate from the normal pattern. We mine two failure modes, slow deterioration and dramatic deterioration. Based on that, we design two failure detectors, ”ThresholdDetector” and ”HybridDetector”, to determine whether a drive deviates from the normal pattern. We evaluate the proposed methods on both SSD and HDD SMART data. DFP-VL is generic yet effective and can interpret the predicted results. DFP-FL has better performance than DFP-VL, but it cannot interpret the results. ThresholdDetector has low complexity and can detect most failing drives. HybridDetector has high complexity and can further improve the detection performance.
Hao Zhou 0040, Zhiheng Niu, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001, Dongshi Liu, Bingnan Kang, Zheng Hu 0002
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.5
2021 A Proactive Failure Tolerant Mechanism for SSDs Storage Systems based on Unsupervised Learning
abstract
As a proactive failure tolerant mechanism in large scale cloud storage systems, drive failure prediction can be used to protect data by early warning before real failures of drives, and therefore improve system dependability and cloud storage service quality. At present, solid state drives (SSDs) are generally widely used in cloud storage systems due to their high performance. SSD failures seriously affect the dependability of the system and the quality of service. Existing proactive failure tolerant mechanisms for storage systems are basically aimed at HDD failure detection and use classification technology (Supervised learning), which relies on enough failure data to establish a classification model. However, the low failure rate of SSDs leads to a serious imbalance in the ratio of positive and negative samples, which brings a big challenge for establishing a proactive failure tolerance mechanism for SSDs storage systems by using classification technology.In this paper, we propose a proactive failure tolerance mechanism for SSDs storage systems based on unsupervised technology. It only uses data of normal SSDs to train the failure prediction model, which means that our method is not limited by the imbalance in SSDs data. At the core of our method is the idea to use VAE-LSTM to learn the pattern of normal SSDs, in which case faulty SSDs can be alerted when their patterns are very different from normal ones. Our method can provide early warning of failures, thereby effectively protecting data and improving the quality of cloud storage service. We also propose a drive failure cause location mechanism, which can help operators analyze the modes of failure by providing guiding suggestions. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we use cross-validation and online testing methods on SSDs data from a technology company. The results show that the FDR and FAR of our method outperform the baselines by 17.25% and 2.39% on average.
Hao Zhou 0040, Zhiheng Niu, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001, Dongshi Liu, Bingnan Kang, Zheng Hu 0002
IWQoS5
2019 Predicting Hard Drive Failures for Cloud Storage Systems
Dongshi Liu, Peng Li 0026, Rebecca J. Stones, Trent Marbach, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001
ICA3PP (1)1