Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhinav Chakraborty 0002
dblp:257/1462-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
distributed differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information theory › estimation theory
correlation estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax estimation · 1.7confidence intervals · 0.9confidence interval · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy BarriersabstractWe consider the problem of estimating the correlation of two random variables $X$ and $Y$, where the pairs $(X,Y)$ are not observed together, but are instead separated co-ordinate-wise at two servers: server 1 contains all the $X$ observations, and server 2 contains the corresponding $Y$ observations. In this vertically distributed setting, we assume that each server has its own privacy constraints, owing to which they can only share suitably privatized statistics of their own component observations. We consider differing privacy budgets $(\varepsilon_1,\delta_1)$ and $(\varepsilon_2,\delta_2)$ for the two servers and determine the minimax optimal rates for correlation estimation allowing for both non-interactive and interactive mechanisms. We also provide correlation estimators that achieve these rates and further develop inference procedures, namely, confidence intervals, for the estimated correlations. Our results are characterized by an interesting rate in terms of the sample size $n$, $\varepsilon_1$, $\varepsilon_2$, which is strictly slower than the usual central privacy estimation rates. More interestingly, we find that the interactive mechanism is always better than its non-interactive counterpart whenever the two privacy budgets are different. Results from extensive numerical experiments support our theoretical findings. Abhinav Chakraborty 0002, Arnab Auddy, T. Tony Cai |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | PrIsing: Privacy-Preserving Peer Effect Estimation via Ising ModelabstractThe Ising model, originally developed as a spin-glass model for ferromagnetic elements, has gained popularity as a network-based model for capturing dependencies in agents’ outputs. Its increasing adoption in healthcare and the social sciences has raised privacy concerns regarding the confidentiality of agents’ responses. In this paper, we present a novel $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private algorithm specifically designed to protect the privacy of individual agents’ outcomes. Our algorithm allows for precise estimation of the natural parameter using a single network through an objective perturbation technique. Furthermore, we establish regret bounds for this algorithm and assess its performance on synthetic datasets and two real-world networks: one involving HIV status in a social network and the other concerning the political leaning of online blogs. Abhinav Chakraborty 0002, Anirban Chatterjee, Abhinandan Dalal |
AISTATS | 1 |