Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiubing Zeng
dblp:257/2727
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › peer production
social coding platforms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor Mechanism · CHI 2022 |
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open source sustainability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor Mechanism · CHI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative and quantitative analysis · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github's Sponsor MechanismabstractWhile many forms of financial support are currently available, there are still many complaints about inadequate financing from software maintainers. In May 2019, GitHub, the world’s most active social coding platform, launched the Sponsor mechanism as a step toward more deeply integrating open source development and financial support. This paper collects data on 8,028 maintainers, 13,555 sponsors, and 22,515 sponsorships and conducts a comprehensive analysis. We explore the relationship between the Sponsor mechanism and developers along four dimensions using a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, examining why developers participate, how the mechanism affects developer activity, who obtains more sponsorships, and what mechanism flaws developers have encountered in the process of using it. We find a long-tail effect in the act of sponsorship, with most maintainers’ expectations remaining unmet, and sponsorship has only a short-term, slightly positive impact on development activity but is not sustainable. While sponsors participate in this mechanism mainly as a means of thanking the developers of OSS that they use, in practice, the social status of developers is the primary influence on the number of sponsorships. We find that both the Sponsor mechanism and open source donations have certain shortcomings and need further improvements to attract more participants. Xunhui Zhang, Tao Wang 0006, Yue Yu 0001, Qiubing Zeng, Huaimin Wang 0001 |
CHI | 4 |
| 2019 | BBCPS: A Blockchain Based Open Source Contribution Protection System
Qiubing Zeng, Xunhui Zhang, Tao Wang 0006, Peichang Shi, Xiang Fu 0002, Chenhui Feng |
BlockSys | 1 |