Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bryan Zaldivar
dblp:257/3226
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy Inputs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy Inputs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy Inputs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy Inputs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.1inducing-point approximation · 0.6input noise modeling · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit ProcessesabstractImplicit Processes (IPs) represent a flexible framework that can be used to describe a wide variety of models, from Bayesian neural networks, neural samplers and data generators to many others. IPs also allow for approximate inference in function-space. This change of formulation solves intrinsic degenerate problems of parameter-space approximate inference concerning the high number of parameters and their strong dependencies in large models. For this, previous works in the literature have attempted to employ IPs both to set up the prior and to approximate the resulting posterior. However, this has proven to be a challenging task. Existing methods that can tune the prior IP result in a Gaussian predictive distribution, which fails to capture important data patterns. By contrast, methods producing flexible predictive distributions by using another IP to approximate the posterior process cannot tune the prior IP to the observed data. We propose here the first method that can accomplish both goals. For this, we rely on an inducing-point representation of the prior IP, as often done in the context of sparse Gaussian processes. The result is a scalable method for approximate inference with IPs that can tune the prior IP parameters to the data, and that provides accurate non-Gaussian predictive distributions. Simón Rodríguez Santana, Bryan Zaldivar, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy InputsabstractIt is a common practice in the machine learning community to assume that the observed data are noise-free in the input attributes. Nevertheless, scenarios with input noise are common in real problems, as measurements are never perfectly accurate. If this input noise is not taken into account, a supervised machine learning method is expected to perform sub-optimally. In this paper, we focus on multi-class classification problems and use Gaussian processes (GPs) as the underlying classifier. Motivated by a data set coming from the astrophysics domain, we hypothesize that the observed data may contain noise in the inputs. Therefore, we devise several multi-class GP classifiers that can account for input noise. Such classifiers can be efficiently trained using variational inference to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the model. Moreover, in some situations, the amount of noise can be known before-hand. If this is the case, it can be readily introduced in the proposed methods. This prior information is expected to lead to better performance results. We have evaluated the proposed methods by carrying out several experiments, involving synthetic and real data. These include several data sets from the UCI repository, the MNIST data set and a data set coming from astrophysics. The results obtained show that, although the classification error is similar across methods, the predictive distribution of the proposed methods is better, in terms of the test log-likelihood, than the predictive distribution of a classifier based on GPs that ignores input noise. Carlos Villacampa-Calvo, Bryan Zaldivar, Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |