Maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) is a viable approach to solving NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems through propositional encodings. Understanding how problem structure and encodings impact the behaviour of different MaxSAT solving algorithms is an important challenge. In this work, we identify MaxSAT instances in which the constraints entail an ordering of the objective variables as an interesting instance class from the perspectives of problem structure and MaxSAT solving. From the problem structure perspective, we show that a non-negligible percentage of instances in commonly used MaxSAT benchmark sets have ordered objectives and further identify various examples of such problem domains to which MaxSAT solvers have been successfully applied. From the algorithmic perspective, we argue that MaxSAT instances with ordered objectives, provided an ordering, can be solved (at least) as efficiently with a very simplistic algorithmic approach as with modern core-based MaxSAT solving algorithms. We show empirically that state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers suffer from overheads and are outperformed by the simplistic approach on real-world optimization problems with ordered objectives.

The implicit hitting set (IHS) approach offers a general framework for solving computationally hard combinatorial optimization problems declaratively. IHS iterates between a decision oracle used for extracting sources of inconsistency and an optimizer for computing so-called hitting sets (HSs) over the accumulated sources of inconsistency. While the decision oracle is language-specific, the optimizers is usually instantiated through integer programming. We explore alternative algorithmic techniques for hitting set optimization based on different ways of employing pseudo-Boolean (PB) reasoning as well as stochastic local search. We extensively evaluate the practical feasibility of the alternatives in particular in the context of pseudo-Boolean (0-1 IP) optimization as one of the most recent instantiations of IHS. Highlighting a trade-off between efficiency and reliability, while a commercial IP solver turns out to remain the most effective way to instantiate HS computations, it can cause correctness issues due to numerical instability; in fact, we show that exact HS computations instantiated via PB reasoning can be made competitive with a numerically exact IP solver. Furthermore, the use of PB reasoning as a basis for HS computations allows for obtaining certificates for the correctness of IHS computations, generally applicable to any IHS instantiation in which reasoning in the declarative language at hand can be captured in the PB-based proof format we employ.

We describe HitPBO 1.0, a from-scratch open-source C++ implementation of the implicit hitting set (IHS) approach to pseudo-Boolean optimization. Compared to earlier implementations, HitPBO adds a range of functionalities and search techniques, certificates, and support for various alternative solvers within IHS. We give an overview of the solver’s architecture and its functionalities.

The propositional satisfiability (SAT) solver Kissat supports a relatively narrow feature set in favor of bare-metal performance and targeted improvements to core solving techniques, which helped it dominate the International SAT Competition since 2024. However, many applications rely on advanced SAT solver features such as incremental interaction schemes, finding direct consequences of assumed literals, or expressive proof logging that allows for real-time checking. This system description reports on how we successfully adapted Kissat’s award-winning techniques to the full-featured incremental SAT solver CaDiCaL, including clausal congruence closure, clausal equivalence sweeping, and bounded variable addition. The main challenge was to support efficient linear proof production with hints. We further extended CaDiCaL’s API to extract implied literals under assumptions and applied advanced deterministic scheduling of inprocessing based on the ticks metric for approximating cache line accesses. Experiments confirm the benefits of these efforts.

Binary decision diagrams (BDDs) are widely applied tools to compactly represent labeled data as directed acyclic graphs; for efficiency and interpretability reasons small BDDs are preferred. Given labeled data, minimizing BDDs is NP-complete and thus recent research focused on the influence of parameters such as the solution size $s$ on the complexity [Ordyniak et al., AAAI 2024]. Our main positive result is an algorithm that is efficient if in particular $s$, the domain size $D$, and the Hamming distance between any two data points is small, improving on previous running-time bounds. This algorithm is inspired by the witness-tree paradigm that was recently successful for computing decision trees [Komusiewicz et al., ICML 2023], whose extension to BDDs was open. We extend our algorithmic results to the case where we allow a small number of misclassified data points and complement them with lower bounds that show that the running times are tight from multiple points of view. We show that our main algorithm holds practical promise by providing a proof-of-concept implementation.

This paper describes our hybrid MaxSAT and mixed integer programming approach for finding minimum hitting sets as submitted to the 2025 PACE challenge. We also discuss hitting set specific challenges, lower bounds, preprocessing and design choices.

Encoding combinatorial problems in terms of propositional satisfiability (SAT) enables utilization of highly efficient SAT solvers for combinatorial search. Local search preprocessing accelerates the SAT solver's search by providing high-quality starting points, a technique implemented in several modern SAT solvers. However, existing preprocessing methods employ generic strategies that fail to exploit the structural patterns inherent in problem encodings. This position paper proposes a novel paradigm wherein Large Language Models (LLMs) analyze problem encoding implementations to synthesize specialized preprocessing algorithms. The LLMs examine Python-based code to identify structural patterns, enabling the automatic generation of encoding-specific local search procedures. These procedures operate across all instances sharing the same encoding scheme rather than requiring instance-specific customization. Our preliminary empirical evaluation demonstrates effective automated algorithm synthesis for structure-aware SAT preprocessing, serving as a foundation for similar approaches across multiple domains of combinatorial optimization.

Decision trees of low depth are beneficial for understanding and interpreting the data they represent. Unfortunately, finding a decision tree of lowest complexity (depth or size) that correctly represents given data is NP-hard. Hence known algorithms either (i) utilize heuristics that do not minimize the depth or (ii) are exact but scale only to small or medium-sized instances. We propose a new hybrid approach to decision tree learning, combining heuristic and exact methods in a novel way. More specifically, we employ SAT encodings repeatedly to local parts of a decision tree provided by a standard heuristic, leading to an overall reduction in complexity. This allows us to scale the power of exact SAT-based methods to comparatively very large data sets. We evaluate our new approach experimentally on a range of real-world instances that contain up to several thousand samples. In almost all cases, our method successfully decreases the complexity of the initial decision tree; often, the decrease is significant.

We introduce backdoor DNFs, as a tool to measure the theoretical hardness of CNF formulas. Like backdoor sets and backdoor trees, backdoor DNFs are defined relative to a tractable class of CNF formulas. Each conjunctive term of a backdoor DNF defines a partial assignment that moves the input CNF formula into the base class. Backdoor DNFs are more expressive and potentially smaller than their predecessors backdoor sets and backdoor trees. We establish the fixed-parameter tractability of the backdoor DNF detection problem. Our results hold for the fundamental base classes Horn and 2CNF, and their combination. We complement our theoretical findings by an empirical study. Our experiments show that backdoor DNFs provide a significant improvement over their predecessors.

We propose a new approach to the Directed Feedback Vertex Set Problem (DFVSP), where the input is a directed graph and the solution is a minimum set of vertices whose removal makes the graph acyclic.

The graph width-measure twin-width recently attracted great attention because of its solving power and generality. Many prominent NP-hard problems are tractable on graphs of bounded twin-width if a certificate for the twin-width bound is provided as an input. Bounded twin-width subsumes other prominent structural restrictions such as bounded treewidth and bounded rank-width. Computing such a certificate is NP-hard itself, already for twin-width 4, and the only known implemented algorithm for twin-width computation is based on a SAT encoding. In this paper, we propose two new algorithmic approaches for computing twin-width that significantly improve the state of the art. Firstly, we develop a SAT encoding that is far more compact than the known encoding and consequently scales to larger graphs. Secondly, we propose a new Branch & Bound algorithm for twin-width that, on many graphs, is significantly faster than the SAT encoding. It utilizes a sophisticated caching system for partial solutions. Both algorithmic approaches are based on new conceptual insights into twin-width computation, including the reordering of contractions.

Hypertree width is a prominent hypergraph invariant with many algorithmic applications in constraint satisfaction and databases. We propose two novel characterisations for hypertree width in terms of linear orderings. We utilize these characterisations to obtain SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT encodings for computing the hypertree width exactly. We evaluate the encodings on an extensive set of benchmark instances and compare them to state-of-the-art exact methods for computing optimal hypertree width. Our results show that our approach outperforms these state-of-the-art algorithms.

Argumentation frameworks (AFs) are a core formalism in the field of formal argumentation. As most standard computational tasks regarding AFs are hard for the first or second level of the Polynomial Hierarchy, a variety of algorithmic approaches to achieve manageable runtimes have been considered in the past. Among them, the backdoor-approach and the treewidth-approach turned out to yield fixed-parameter tractable fragments. However, many applications yield high parameter values for these methods, often rendering them infeasible in practice. We introduce the backdoor-treewidth approach for abstract argumentation, combining the best of both worlds with a guaranteed parameter value that does not exceed the minimum of the backdoor- and treewidth-parameter. In particular, we formally define backdoor-treewidth and establish fixed-parameter tractability for standard reasoning tasks of abstract argumentation. Moreover, we provide systems to find and exploit backdoors of small width, and conduct systematic experiments evaluating the new parameter.

The graph invariant twin-width was recently introduced by Bonnet, Kim, Thomassé, and Watrigan. Problems expressible in first-order logic, which includes many prominent NP-hard problems, are tractable on graphs of bounded twin-width if a certificate for the twin-width bound is provided as an input. Computing such a certificate, however, is an intrinsic problem, for which no nontrivial algorithm is known. In this paper, we propose the first practical approach for computing the twin-width of graphs together with the corresponding certificate. We propose efficient SAT-encodings that rely on a characterization of twin-width based on elimination sequences. This allows us to determine the twin-width of many famous graphs with previously unknown twin-width. We utilize our encodings to identify the smallest graphs for a given twin-width bound d ∊ {1,…,4}.

We propose a new approach to the Directed Feedback Vertex Set Problem (DFVSP), where the input is a directed graph and the solution is a minimum set of vertices whose removal makes the graph acyclic. Our approach, implemented in the solver DAGer, is based on two novel contributions: Firstly, we add a wide range of data reductions that are partially inspired by reductions for the similar vertex cover problem. For this, we give a theoretical basis for lifting reductions from vertex cover to DFVSP but also incorporate novel ideas into strictly more general and new DFVSP reductions. Secondly, we propose dynamically encoding DFVSP in propositional logic using cycle propagation for improved performance. Cycle propagation builds on the idea that already a limited number of the constraints in a propositional encoding is usually sufficient for finding an optimal solution. Our algorithm, therefore, starts with a small number of constraints and cycle propagation adds additional constraints when necessary. We propose an efficient integration of cycle propagation into the workflow of MaxSAT solvers, further improving the performance of our algorithm. Our extensive experimental evaluation shows that DAGer significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art solvers and that our data reductions alone directly solve many of the instances.

Bonnet et al. (FOCS 2020) introduced the graph invariant twin-width and showed that many NP-hard problems are tractable for graphs of bounded twin-width, generalizing similar results for other width measures, including treewidth and clique-width. In this paper, we investigate the use of twin-width for solving the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) and propositional model counting. We particularly focus on Bounded-ones Weighted Model Counting (BWMC), which takes as input a CNF formula $F$ along with a bound $k$ and asks for the weighted sum of all models with at most $k$ positive literals. BWMC generalizes not only SAT but also (weighted) model counting. We develop the notion of "signed" twin-width of CNF formulas and establish that BWMC is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the certified signed twin-width of $F$ plus $k$. We show that this result is tight: it is neither possible to drop the bound $k$ nor use the vanilla twin-width instead if one wishes to retain fixed-parameter tractability, even for the easier problem SAT. Our theoretical results are complemented with an empirical evaluation and comparison of signed twin-width on various classes of CNF formulas.

Treewidth and hypertree width have proven to be highly successful structural parameters in the context of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). When either of these parameters is bounded by a constant, then CSP becomes solvable in polynomial time. However, here the order of the polynomial in the running time depends on the width, and this is known to be unavoidable; therefore, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by either of these width measures. Here we introduce an enhancement of tree and hypertree width through a novel notion of thresholds, allowing the associated decompositions to take into account information about the computational costs associated with solving the given CSP instance. Aside from introducing these notions, we obtain efficient theoretical as well as empirical algorithms for computing threshold treewidth and hypertree width and show that these parameters give rise to fixed-parameter algorithms for CSP as well as other, more general problems. We complement our theoretical results with experimental evaluations in terms of heuristics as well as exact methods based on SAT/SMT encodings.

Decision trees of low depth are beneficial for understanding and interpreting the data they represent. Unfortunately, finding a decision tree of lowest depth that correctly represents given data is NP-hard. Hence known algorithms either (i) utilize heuristics that do not optimize the depth or (ii) are exact but scale only to small or medium-sized instances. We propose a new hybrid approach to decision tree learning, combining heuristic and exact methods in a novel way. More specifically, we employ SAT encodings repeatedly to local parts of a decision tree provided by a standard heuristic, leading to a global depth improvement. This allows us to scale the power of exact SAT-based methods to almost arbitrarily large data sets. We evaluate our new approach experimentally on a range of real-world instances that contain up to several thousand samples. In almost all cases, our method successfully decreases the depth of the initial decision tree; often, the decrease is significant.

We introduce backdoor DNFs, as a tool to measure the theoretical hardness of CNF formulas. Like backdoor sets and backdoor trees, backdoor DNFs are defined relative to a tractable class of CNF formulas. Each conjunctive term of a backdoor DNF defines a partial assignment that moves the input CNF formula into the base class. Backdoor DNFs are more expressive and potentially smaller than their predecessors backdoor sets and backdoor trees. We establish the fixed-parameter tractability of the backdoor DNF detection problem. Our results hold for the fundamental base classes Horn and 2CNF, and their combination. We complement our theoretical findings by an empirical study. Our experiments show that backdoor DNFs provide a significant improvement over their predecessors.

Hypertree width is a prominent hypergraph invariant with many algorithmic applications in constraint satisfaction and databases. We propose a novel characterization for hypertree width in terms of linear elimination orderings. We utilize this characterization to generate a new SAT encoding that we evaluate on an extensive set of benchmark instances. We compare it to state-of-the-art exact methods for computing optimal hypertree width. Our results show that the encoding based on the new characterization is not only significantly more compact than known encodings but also outperforms the other methods.

We propose a new algorithmic method for computing the hypertree width of hypergraphs, and we evaluate its performance empirically. At the core of our approach lies a novel ordering based characterization of hypertree width which lends to an efficient encoding to SAT modulo Theory (SMT). We tested our algorithm on an extensive benchmark set consisting of real-world instances from various sources. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms for hypertree width. We achieve a further speedup by a new technique that first solves a relaxation of the problem and subsequently uses the solution to guide the algorithm for solving the problem itself.

The Steiner tree problem is a well-known problem in network design, routing, and VLSI design. Given a graph, edge costs, and a set of dedicated vertices (terminals), the Steiner tree problem asks to output a sub-graph that connects all terminals at minimum cost. A state-of-the-art algorithm to solve the Steiner tree problem by means of dynamic programming is the Dijkstra-Steiner algorithm. The algorithm builds a Steiner tree of the entire instance by systematically searching for smaller instances, based on subsets of the terminals, and combining Steiner trees for these smaller instances. The search heavily relies on a guiding heuristic function in order to prune the search space. However, to ensure correctness, this algorithm allows only for limited heuristic functions, namely, those that satisfy a so-called consistency condition. In this paper, we enhance the Dijkstra-Steiner algorithm and establish a revisited algorithm, called DS*. The DS* algorithm allows for arbitrary lower bounds as heuristics relaxing the previous condition on the heuristic function. Notably, we can now use linear programming based lower bounds. Further, we capture new requirements for a heuristic function in a condition, which we call admissibility. We show that admissibility is indeed weaker than consistency and establish correctness of the DS* algorithm when using an admissible heuristic function. We implement DS* and combine it with modern preprocessing, resulting in an open-source solver (DS*Solve). Finally, we compare its performance on standard benchmarks and observe a competitive behavior.

Treewidth and hypertree width have proven to be highly successful structural parameters in the context of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). When either of these parameters is bounded by a constant, then CSP becomes solvable in polynomial time. However, here the order of the polynomial in the running time depends on the width, and this is known to be unavoidable; therefore, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by either of these width measures. Here we introduce an enhancement of tree and hypertree width through a novel notion of thresholds, allowing the associated decompositions to take into account information about the computational costs associated with solving the given CSP instance. Aside from introducing these notions, we obtain efficient theoretical as well as empirical algorithms for computing threshold treewidth and hypertree width and show that these parameters give rise to fixed-parameter algorithms for CSP as well as other, more general problems. We complement our theoretical results with experimental evaluations in terms of heuristics as well as exact methods based on SAT/SMT encodings.