EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carolyn S. Kaminski
dblp:257/5651
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 50% Web and social media mining · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining
information diffusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Timelines for Network Processes · ICDM 2019 |
Data mining › network analysis
network dynamics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Timelines for Network Processes · ICDM 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
heuristics · 0.4disaggregation · 0.4aggregation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Optimal Timelines for Network ProcessesabstractStructural models for network dynamics typically assume a discrete timeline of network events (node activation or link creation) and a stochastic generative process giving rise to new events based on the event history and the network structure. In order to employ these models for prediction, observational data is often aggregated at a fixed temporal resolution (e.g., minutes or days). However, the underlying network processes may “speed up” or “slow down” at different points in time, rendering observations unlikely and predictions incorrect. The challenge is to optimize the timescale for the analysis of network event data, which in turn is based on structural models of the underlying network processes. We introduce the general problem of inferring the optimal temporal resolution for network event data. The goal is to map observed network events to discrete time steps by aggregation and/or disaggregation of their original timeline such that they are collectively well-explained by structural dynamics models. We unify network growth and information diffusion models and differentiate between short- and long-memory processes. We demonstrate that while optimal temporal aggregation can be performed in polynomial time, disaggregation-and thus, the general timescale inference problem-is NP-hard. We propose scalable heuristics for the problem, some with approximation guarantees, and employ them for missing event recovery and temporal link prediction, demonstrating significant improvements (absolute increase of 10% in F1 measure for event recovery and of 5% in AUC for link prediction) compared to employing the same algorithms on the default timescale of data collection. Daniel J. DiTursi, Carolyn S. Kaminski, Petko Bogdanov |
ICDM | 2 |