Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Filip Sondej
dblp:257/7255
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Multi-agent systems · 22% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent collaboration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
neuron analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model safety
safety fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › AI agent security
multi-agent system security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
prompt injection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › representation engineering
activation editing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
toxicity reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial machine learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 1.7safety instruction · 1.7memory vaccination · 1.7mechanistic interpretability · 0.9activation editing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent SystemsabstractAs AI agents are increasingly adopted to collaborate on complex objectives, ensuring the security of autonomous multi-agent systems becomes crucial. We develop simulations of agents collaborating on shared objectives to study these security risks and security trade-offs. We focus on scenarios where an attacker compromises one agent, using it to steer the entire system toward misaligned outcomes by corrupting other agents. In this context, we observe infectious malicious prompts - the multi-hop spreading of malicious instructions. To mitigate this risk, we evaluated several strategies: two "vaccination" approaches that insert false memories of safely handling malicious input into the agents' memory stream, and two versions of a generic safety instruction strategy. While these defenses reduce the spread and fulfillment of malicious instructions in our experiments, they tend to decrease collaboration capability in the agent network. Our findings illustrate potential trade-off between security and collaborative efficiency in multi-agent systems, providing insights for designing more secure yet effective AI collaborations. Pierre Peigné, Mikolaj Kniejski, Filip Sondej, Matthieu David, Jason Hoelscher-Obermaier, Christian Schröder de Witt, Esben Kran |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Are there different types of error monitoring? A microstates analysis of error-related brain activity across three tasks
Anna Grabowska, Filip Sondej, Magdalena Senderecka |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2025 | How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level AnalysisabstractSafety fine-tuning algorithms reduce harmful outputs in language models, yet their mechanisms remain under-explored.Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a popular choice of algorithm, but prior explanations, attributing its effects solely to dampened toxic neurons in the MLP layers, are incomplete.In this study, we analyse four language models (Llama-3.1-8B,Gemma-2-2B, Mistral-7B, GPT-2-Medium) and show that toxic neurons only account for 2.5% to 24% of DPO's effects across models.Instead, DPO balances distributed activation shifts across a majority of MLP neurons to create a net toxicity reduction.We attribute this reduction to four neuron groups, two aligned with reducing toxicity and two promoting anti-toxicity, whose combined effects replicate DPO across models.To further validate this understanding, we develop an activation editing method mimicking DPO through distributed shifts along a toxicity representation in both probe-based and probe-free settings.This method outperforms DPO in reducing toxicity while preserving perplexity across models, without requiring any weight updates.Our work provides a mechanistic understanding of DPO and introduces an efficient, tuning-free alternative for safety fine-tuning.Our code is available on dpo-toxic-neurons. Filip Sondej, Harry Mayne, Adam Mahdi |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2019 | On the Role of Trust in Child-Robot InteractionabstractIn child-robot interaction, the element of trust towards the robot is critical. This is particularly important the first time the child meets the robot, as the trust gained during this interaction can play a decisive role in future interactions. We present an in-the-wild study where Polish kindergartners interacted with a Pepper robot. The videos of this study were analyzed for the issues of trust, anthropomorphization, and reaction to malfunction, with the assumption that the last two factors influence the children's trust towards Pepper. Our results reveal children's interest in the robot performing tasks specific for humans, highlight the importance of the conversation scenario and the need for an extended library of answers provided by the robot about its abilities or origin and show how children tend to provoke the robot. Paulina Zguda, Bartlomiej Sniezynski, Bipin Indurkhya, Anna Kolota, Mateusz Jarosz, Filip Sondej, Takamune Izui, Maria Dziok, Anna Belowska, Wojciech Jedras, Gentiane Venture |
RO-MAN | 6 |