Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lanjue Chen

dblp:258/0643 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization
0.712023
Distributed Algorithms for U-statistics-based Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.212023
Distributed Algorithms for U-statistics-based Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
divide-and-conquer
0.212023
Distributed Algorithms for U-statistics-based Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

one-step updating · 1.3m-estimation · 1.3divide-and-conquer · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Distributed Algorithms for U-statistics-based Empirical Risk Minimization
abstract
Empirical risk minimization, where the underlying loss function depends on a pair of data points, covers a wide range of application areas in statistics including pairwise ranking and survival analysis. The common empirical risk estimator obtained by averaging values of a loss function over all possible pairs of observations is essentially a U-statistic. One well-known problem with minimizing U-statistic type empirical risks, is that the computational complexity of U-statistics increases quadratically with the sample size. When faced with big data, this poses computational challenges as the colossal number of observation pairs virtually prohibits centralized computing to be performed on a single machine. This paper addresses this problem by developing two computationally and statistically efficient methods based on the divide-and-conquer strategy on a decentralized computing system, whereby the data are distributed among machines to perform the tasks. One of these methods is based on a surrogate of the empirical risk, while the other method extends the one-step updating scheme in classical M-estimation to the case of pairwise loss. We show that the proposed estimators are as asymptotically efficient as the benchmark global U-estimator obtained under centralized computing. As well, we introduce two distributed iterative algorithms to facilitate the implementation of the proposed methods, and conduct extensive numerical experiments to demonstrate their merit.
Lanjue Chen, Alan T. K. Wan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1